1 / 59

SA Meat and the Global Market

SA Meat and the Global Market . André Jooste Senior Manager: Market and Economic Research Centre, National Agricultural Marketing Council 13 March 2008. Structure of presentation. International overview Price trends in SA Consumption trends in SA Pointers Conclusions.

jaden
Télécharger la présentation

SA Meat and the Global Market

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SA Meat and the Global Market André Jooste Senior Manager: Market and Economic Research Centre, National Agricultural Marketing Council 13 March 2008

  2. Structure of presentation • International overview • Price trends in SA • Consumption trends in SA • Pointers • Conclusions

  3. World cattle producers SA ave: 630 000 t Source: FAPRI, 2004

  4. World supply and demand for beef and veal Source: OECD and FAO secretariats

  5. World beef exports Source: OECD, 2004

  6. Imports projections (beef and veal) Source: FAPRI 2006

  7. World trade projections (beef) Source: OECD and FAO secretariats

  8. 126 393 116 195 134 98 92 33 Vloei in '000 t cwe 25-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 200-300 300-400 > 400 Based on GIRA figures World beef trade flows,EU-12, 1990 Source: Spanghero, 2002

  9. 117 313 172 597 205 60 49 73 64 Vloei in '000 t cwe 25-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 200-300 300-400 > 400 Based on GIRA figures World beef trade flows ,EU-15, 1995 Source: Spanghero, 2002

  10. 279 155 112 317 25 60 39 35 29 48 Vloei in '000 t cwe 25-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 200-300 300-400 > 400 Based on GIRA figures World beef trade flows,EU-15, 2000 Source: Spanghero, 2002

  11. World beef trade flows, AU/NZ - 2005

  12. World beef trade flows, EU and North America - 2005

  13. World beef trade flows, S.Am - 2005

  14. World beef trade flows,2005 (GMC)

  15. Decline Per capita consumption 2006 vs 2016 Source: FAPRI, 2007

  16. Results - Beef finishingPurchase prices (US$ per 100 kg live weight)

  17. Results - Beef finishingShort and medium term profitability (US$ per 100 kg carcass weight)

  18. Liberalization in 1995 • Deregulation in 1997 • - Beef industry already • started in 1992 Background: Evolution of the industry • The major transition periods: • Opportunity driven (1970s) • Production driven (1980s) • Cost driven (1990s) • Consumer driven (2000 -) IS IT GOOD ENOUGH TO BE CONSUMER ORIENTATED??

  19. Price trends Source: AMT

  20. Price trends – focus on beef Source: DoA, 2008

  21. Weaner and A2/A3 carcass prices Source: AMT, 2007

  22. Increased volatility Period of significant gains and losses More or less in balance Price trends Source: DoA

  23. Producer share in the retail price of rump Source: STATSSA & own calculations

  24. Producer share in the retail price of sirloin Source: STATSSA & own calculations

  25. Producer share in the retail price of topside Source: STATSSA & own calculations

  26. Producer share in the retail price of brisket Source: STATSSA & own calculations

  27. Producer share in the retail price of chuck Source: STATSSA & own calculations

  28. Consumption trends Source: DoA

  29. Consumption trends (…continue) Source: DoA

  30. Consumption trends (…continue) Source: DoA

  31. Consumption trends (…continue) Source: DoA

  32. Short term trends • Beef prices are high and will most probably remain firm • Aren’t we lucky?? • Consumption on the up, i.e. total and per capita • Alternative scenario: • Prices low • Consumption on historical downward trend (prior to 2000) • We know the end result!!

  33. Let’s look at this from another angle • Red meat industry realized that much must be done to change the image of red meat • R&D on consumer behaviour • Promotion • Competitions • However, a closer look shows: • Total per capita red meat consumption more likely to be 23.96kg • Beef down to 15.73kg, • Pork down to 3.27kg, • Sheep down to 3kg.  • Turn around in macro-economic conditions (Econ growth) • Mainstreaming economic activity of blacks (“black diamonds”)

  34. Composition of food and non-alcoholic beverages Source: IES 1995, IES 2000, IES 2005/06

  35. Time to rethink our orientation?? • Although the industry transformed with positive results one can safely postulate that being consumer orientated (in theory) is not sufficient • It falls short of international developments in agro-food chains.

  36. Some pointers: Factors determining buying decisions • Factors determining beef buying decisions are changing • Economic vs non economic factors • This is the trend internationally

  37. Desirable characteristics of beef USA(1=extremely desirable; 5 = not at all desirable) Sitz, Calkins, Umberger, Feuz -U of Neb., 2004

  38. Desirable characteristics of beef Japan 89 Safe 81 72 70 Purchase with confidence HGP/Chemical free Delicious 59 Juicy 52 47 Reasonable price 46 Availability Tender 41 Non fatty 39 Nutritional 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 % of consumers surveyed Source: MLA

  39. Importance of product attributes per Cluster - (Free State Province) Source: Botha, F., Taljaard, P., Jooste, A. & Pelser, A. (2007). UFS.

  40. Some pointers: Other factors • More sophisticated consumers and linking it with product development • E.g. Checkoff program in US – 500 new products between 03 and 04 • In SA probably not even a 100 since 2003 to date • Lack of internationally acceptable traceability system • Problem/impact compounded if one considers guarantees to comply with increasing and more stringent standards set at the retail level, as well as to export.

  41. Some pointers: Other factors • Is our grading system still appropriate? Source: MLA

  42. Some pointers: Other factors • Transparent, accurate and timely red meat information system is basically non-existent. • The result is far from optimal chain sequencing putting pressure on chain governance and relationships. • Dualistic nature of beef industry • Growing informal market • Policing of regulations and health standards very difficult • Puts the whole industry at jeopardy since poor quality product can now reach the market undetected. • Very difficult to manage and control diseases

  43. Let me repeat: • No/very little information flows • Traceability lacking • Slackness in the industry to create uniqueness • Problems with industry structure • Most notable is the dualistic nature of the industry • This at a time when: • Productivity is increasing • Improved technology (slaughtering and processing) • Continued investment in “uniqueness” • Traceability • Information systems

  44. Therefore: • A value chain orientation (in practical terms) is necessary, e.g. • Relationships • Info systems • Some companies/chain players are responding, but overall industry response lacking • Challenge for organised structures in red meat industry to respond and maintain momentum

  45. Source Roduner (2005)

  46. Some value chain influencers

  47. China – the growing tiger (“the vacuum”) • Has a fifth of the world’s population and GDP gorwth at 9-10% • Food is one of the largest budget items for households • 38% for urban households • 50% for rural households • The number of rural households in the middle class • 7.6 million in 1995 • 42 million in 2005 • This will grow to 199 million in 2015 (McKinsey Quarterly)

  48. China – the growing tiger • As living standards increase they are curring back on staple foods such as rice and wheat. • Consumption of dairy, fish, wine and processed food on the increase. • Food imports in the region of US$25 billion • 4th largest in the world • Do not only buy food, but want safe and sophisticated food.

More Related