50 likes | 168 Vues
This document outlines a structured approach for evaluating digital content in educational settings, involving multiple groups with diverse expertise, including teachers, tutors, IT education specialists, and project team members. Participants will develop sub-statements to address questions regarding the appropriateness, quality, comprehensiveness, and ease of use of the content. The methodology emphasizes the importance of defining acceptable performance percentages for each evaluation category, ensuring that educational materials align with curriculum goals and support effective teaching and learning.
E N D
8 Groups • Each group should have at least 2 teachers, I tutor, I TIE or Researcher and 1 project team member
Instructions • Develop sub-statements under each questions • For example:
Weighted means • Which 3 categories do you think should be given priority and why? • Appropriateness of content (Should be within the stated goals and objectives of the curriculum) – 60%, 80%, 75%, 80% (74%) • Quality and comprehensiveness of content (maximum understanding of material required) – 60%, 80%,75%, 75% (73%) • Ease of Use (Learner and teachers to use the materials effectively) – 60%, 75%, 75% (71%) • Maintenance 80% • What should be the minimum acceptable percentage for each of these categories? • What should be the overall average acceptable Percentage? 60%, 75%,75, 75% (71%)