950 likes | 1.05k Vues
IDEAS Conference Chennai, India January 24 – 27, 2010. A Financial Pre-Cautionary Principle: New Rules for Financial Product Safety Gerald Epstein Department of Economics and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) University of Massachusetts, Amherst USA.
E N D
IDEAS Conference Chennai, India January 24 – 27, 2010 A Financial Pre-Cautionary Principle: New Rules for Financial Product SafetyGerald EpsteinDepartment of Economics and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI)University of Massachusetts, AmherstUSA
Based on: Epstein and Crotty, “Avoiding Another Meltdown” Challenge Magazine, January-February, 2009 ; and “A Financial Precautionary Principle: New Rules for Financial Product Safety”; And James Crotty, “Structural Causes of the Global Financial Crisis”, found at: www.peri.umass.edu Joint Work with James Crotty
"The world is on the edge of the abyss because of an irresponsible system" – French Prime Minister, Francois Fillon, Financial Times, October 3, 2008
Causes of Financial Crisis • Neo-liberalism and inequality at core of crisis: • But here I want to focus on one aspect of this: • System of “light-touch” Financial Regulation and its interaction with the “New Financial Architecture” best illustrated by the “Originate and Distribute Model of Finance”
“Those of us who have looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect shareholders’ equity, myself included, are in a stated of shocked disbelief”. Alan Greenspan Testimony, 23/10/08
Alan Greenspan, Congressional testimony, 23/10/08, on regulation • “I made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations, specifically banks and others, were such as that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms”
“In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working,” Mr. Waxman said. • “Absolutely, precisely,” Mr. Greenspan replied. “…that’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I have been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.”
Longer Term Perspective 1900 -2008 Current Crisis Source: Reinhart and Rogoff, 2008a
In U.S. New Deal Regulation of Finance • Separation of commercial and investment Banking (Glass-Steagall) • Segmented Asset Classes and Institutions • Restrictions on Securitization and other NEW Financial Products
Largely due to pressure from large banks and their allies in the Fed, Treasury, Congress and the White House New Deal System of financial Regulation Eroded in the U.S. in the 1970’s, and 80’s
Essence of the New Financial Regulatory System • Self-Regulation • Outsourcing Regulation • Ineffective public regulation of only some of the financial sector
Self-Regulation • -Banks develop own risk management systems • _As part of the Basel Capital Requirements, use their own Value at Risk models (VaR models) to estimate how risky their assets were in order to determine for themselves how much capital they should hold to back these assets up.
Outsourcing Regulation to Gate-Keepers • Bond ratings agencies (Moodys, Standard and Poors, Fitch) • Accounting firms
Ratings agencies • Key problem: conflict of interests • Yet played quasi-official role in the system • -- rated asset backed securities so that pension funds and others could buy them • --- their ratings fed into the Basel “risk-adjusted” capital requirements
Creation of Un-regulated Shadow Banking System • Over the Counter (OTC) Derivatives Markets • Hedge Funds • Private Equity Funds
De-Regulation led to: • New Financial Architecture: Originate and • Distribute Model
STRUCTURAL FLAWS IN THE NFA POWERED THE BOOM, CAUSED THE CRISIS AND MUST BE FIXED Structural Flaws In The New Financial Architecture (NFA)
Five Fatal Flaws of the New Financial Architecture (NFA) • NFA: Flaw 1 • Asymmetric and perverse incentives that led virtually all actors to take excessive risk. • For example: • -Bankers made money on way up but didn’t lose on the way down • Credit Rating agencies – paid to give over-optimistic ratings
NFA: Flaw 2 • A regulatory framework that was lax at best and that ignored the “shadow banking system” of hedge funds, private equity funds and the like.
NFA: Flaw 3 • Financial innovations that led to assets that were murky and opaque (non-transparent and complex) • This is the focus of this paper.
NFA: Flaw 4 • A system that was at root pro-cyclical in its dynamics and led to excessive leverage.
NFA: Flaw 5 • The Financial System was too big, too complex and too inter-connected to understand and to fail.
Focus now on one aspect • The Regulation of New Financial Products
The Dangers of High Risk Financial Products • High risk Financial Products were at root of crisis • Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), CDOs-squared • Credit Default Swaps (CDS) (AIG, etc.) • others
According to the Financial Times: almost half of all these credit products have now defaulted, "these defaults have affected more than $300 billion worth of collateralized debt obligations”
Complex and Opaque Products • Spread throughout the system in US and abroad • 2. Led to crisis of confidence • 3. Led to liquidity crises
Complex and Opaque Products • 4. Made it difficult for the Lender of Last Resort (Fed, and other central banks) to save the system from collapsing • 5. Now making it very difficult to revive the financial system’s productive role in the economy because it has rendered so many financial institutions insolvent and holding financial assets that no one knows the values of.
With a financial pre-cautionary principle, it is very unlikely they would have been allowed to have been sold Such risky and opaque products should have been tested before they could be sold.
Definition of Precautionary Principle • The precautionary principle is a moral and politicalprinciple which states that if an action or policy might cause severe or irreversible harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of a scientific consensus that harm would not occur, the burden of proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action.
Several Analysts have proposed that new financial products be approved • Joseph Stiglitz • George Soros • Daniel McFadden • Martin Hellwig • Others….
No one has detailed how this would work in the U.S. in the current period • That is what we try to do in our paper: • “A Financial Pre-Cautionary Principle: New Rules for Financial Product Safety”
There are precedents: • Malaysia • India • Spain • Earlier precedents in the U.S. and Europe
Indian Example • Reserve Bank of India (RBI) • Governor Y.V Reddy: • Was the Devil • Now: • He is the Hero who Saved the Indian Financial System
RBI: Precautionary Principle for New Financial Products • According to the Bank Reserve Act of 1949: • “Banks can carry out only those activities that are permitted. • Engagement in some financial products are clearly prohibited. • Other are clearly allowed. • Then, there are those in between.
Products neither permitted or allowed? • Banks have clear sense that they should get permission from the RBI before proceeding because the RBI might take action later on that is costly to them.
With respect to new financial markets: • They must always get permission.
New Products • RBI is reluctant to issue formal approval of products that it is not sure are safe. • So RBI issues safeguards and guidelines • RBI monitors performance of products and then might choose to tighten guidelines.
Examples: • Only certain, plain vanilla derivatives are allowed: • Forwards • Interest rate swaps • Interest rate futures • Structured Products cannot contain derivatives that are otherwise prohibited
Structured Products: • Market Makers must be able to mark to market or demonstate prices by market prices • Must be contracted at prevailing prices • (This makes it difficult to design complex “bestoke” products )
Unique, important provision • Banks can only offer complex derivatives if it has an underlying exposure on account of commercial transactions. • So complex bets on bets, such as Credit Default Swaps are not allowed.
More Capital required for structured products: • More capital has to be held by the originator for complex structured products.
Many of these provisions are now being liberalized Liberalization
Approaches to Financial Preacautionary Principle • Build on the Analogy of the RBI. • Requires that Fed has the orientation of the RBI, and wants to implement such a policy. It involves a lot of discretion.
Create New Authority • Use Indian lessons, but create new authority with the objective and culture designed specifically to tackle this problem.
Build on the analogy of the Food and Drug Administration in the United States • Drugs cannot be marketed unless they first get approved by the FDA • Evaluation is divided in to two main stages: • Pre-Marketing Evaluation • Post-Marketing Enforcement, regulation and re-evaluation
Financial Stability and Product Safety Administration (FSPSA) • Stresses that the main concern is the impact of financial products on over-all financial stability • as well as on the health of institutions that sell and buy the products. • Use of the term “Administration” stresses the analogy with the Food and Drug Administration.
FSPSA • Implement the key principle: New Financial Products must be approved before they are marketed. • Some will not be approved if they cannot be shown to be effective and if their risk characteristics are not sufficiently transparent or are to dangerous for overall financial stability. • Those that are problematic but can be marketed way have significant restrictions placed on their sale and use.
FSPSA • For example: • They might only be able to be sold on a limited basis to certain kinds of institutions • Those buying them may have to keep higher capital or liquidity levels to support them • They might have to be priced at a higher level to reflect the overall societal risk. • They might have a short sunset period after which they would have to be re-authorized in order to be marketed.