1 / 46

Status of Research on Early Colleges

Status of Research on Early Colleges. A presentation at Appalachian State Julie Edmunds, SERVE Center at UNCG. Goals for Today’s Session. Brief description of early colleges An overview of current research on early colleges Results from an experimental study

jaimie
Télécharger la présentation

Status of Research on Early Colleges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of Research on Early Colleges A presentation at Appalachian State Julie Edmunds, SERVE Center at UNCG

  2. Goals for Today’s Session • Brief description of early colleges • An overview of current research on early colleges • Results from an experimental study • Some potential gaps in the research

  3. THE EARLY COLLEGE MODEL

  4. A National Movement • Idea started with La Guardia Community College • National Early College High School Initiative—supported by Gates Foundation • NC has the most schools—74+

  5. Early Colleges • Small schools that blur the line between high school and college • Mostly located on college campuses • Leads to HS diploma AND 2 years of college credit • Serve students in grades 9-12 or 13 • Targeted at students who are underrepresented in college • First generation; low-income; minority

  6. Articulated program of study, grades 9-12 or 13 leading to Associate’s degree, college readiness activities Academic and affective supports, supportive relationships High-quality, rigorous, and relevant instruction, ongoing assessment Shared leadership, shared vision Small size, location on college campus, flexible use of time Ongoing professional development, staff collaboration, collective responsibility

  7. What questions should be answered about this model?

  8. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT RESEARCH

  9. Current Research

  10. Studies being conducted • Program descriptions • Case studies of individual schools • Qualitative research related to students’ experiences • Policy analyses • National descriptive evaluation • Quasi-experimental and experimental studies

  11. IMPACT OF THE EARLY COLLEGE MODEL

  12. Impact Findings—National Evaluation • Early colleges outperform their districts on standardized assessments • Higher on-time graduation rate • Students earned an average of 23 high school credits before graduating high school • BUT does not control for incoming achievement or motivation

  13. Impact Findings-Quasi-Experimental Studies • Texas early college students outperform comparison group students on math and reading exams (SRI) • Students in one early college high school outperformed comparison students on all EOCs (Kaniuka)

  14. Impact—Experimental Study • Independent study funded by the Institute of Education Sciences—Not sponsored by NCNSP • Partnership between SERVE, NCDPI, NC New Schools Project, Duke University, UNCG, Abt Associates, RTI International • Seven-year experimental study comparing students who applied to the early college, went through a lottery, and were randomly chosen to attend (treatment) or not to attend (control).

  15. Study Goals • Examine impact of model on student outcomes including: behavior, achievement, course-taking, dropouts, graduation, postsecondary enrollment. • Determine whether impact varies by student characteristics, such as: race/ethnicity; poverty status; first generation college status; and prior achievement. • Determine whether specific program components are associated with better student outcomes. • Conduct a cost-benefit analysis.

  16. Map of Sites Participating in the Study2010-2011 v Early College High School Study Site District with an Early College

  17. Data Sources • Administrative Data—Early college and Control • DPI--Test scores, attendance, suspensions, dropouts • Community college—course performance • National Student Clearinghouse—postsecondary enrollment

  18. Data Sources • Student Opinion Survey—Early college and Control • School experiences, attitudes toward school • Implementation Surveys, Site Visits and Interviews—Early college only

  19. Study Sample • Students apply to early college • Conduct lottery for “eligible applicant pool” • Compare results for students who got in and those who didn’t • 9th Grade: 1,610 students in 18 cohorts in 12 schools • 10th Grade: 676 students in 8 cohorts in 6 schools

  20. We are comparing…. Early College Group Control Group

  21. College prep course- taking and success College-going aspirations Staying in school IMPACTS ON…

  22. Core 9th Grade Academic Outcomes At least 1 math English 1 *Significant at p≤.05 or less

  23. Core 10th Grade Academic Outcomes Biology At least 2 math courses *Significant at p≤.01 or less

  24. Aspirations to a 4-year College—9th and 10th grade *Significant at p≤.01.

  25. 10th Grade Outcomes Associated with Persisting in School *Significant at p≤.05 or less

  26. Impact on Student Attitudes—10th grade • Findings: • Early college students report lower levels of English Self-Efficacy(effect size=.3). • Why might this be? • We suspect that the reading and writing expectations are higher in the early college setting.

  27. Our study will look at… • Impact on upper grades • Academic performance • Attendance and behavior • Dropping out • Impact on high school graduation • Number of college credits earned while in high school

  28. What other impacts have people seen? What else needs to be looked at relative to impacts?

  29. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EARLY COLLEGE MODEL

  30. Students’ High School Experiences • Students reported rigor, relevance, and relationships (AIR/Gates) • Close personal relationships (Bruce; Thompson and Onganga) • Staff-students • Peer relationships

  31. Students’ High School Experiences • Instruction is of mixed quality (Duffy) • Scored higher on many dimensions than college instruction • Early colleges provided assignments of higher “authentic intellectual quality” (Smith)

  32. Experimental Study: ECHS students have better school experiences… Source: Student Opinion Survey, administered to treatment and control

  33. Strong relationships make it easier for students to get help. “I feel like having a better relationship with the teachers makes it easier for me if I’m struggling in something to go up to that teacher and talk to them about it because if I don’t have a personal relationship with someone I don’t like admitting that I’m having trouble.” “… we know the teachers personally…they are our friends. So you’re not worried about what they’re going to say. When they criticize you, you know that it’s just to help you, not just brushing you off to the side.”

  34. Students’ College Experiences • Early college students perform just as well as traditional entry students while in high school (Fischetti & Smith) • Early college students can struggle in college classes • Problem of early failure (Aleia) • Need to balance support for students with creating more independent learners (AIR/Gates)

  35. High School-College Partnerships • Overall, early colleges on college campuses got better results (AIR/Gates) • Little collaboration between early college and college faculty (AIR/Gates) • Comm. College faculty perceive early colleges as beneficial but concerns over space, behavior, and the impact on adult learners (Williams)

  36. Policies and Support for Early Colleges • Ensuring early colleges implement core principles is important (AIR/Gates) • Early estimates have early colleges cost about 5-12% more (JFF) • Certain policies are required to support early college high schools (Hoffman & Vargas)

  37. What else have people learned about program implementation?

  38. GAPS IN THE LITERATURE

  39. Gaps in the Literature--Impacts • Postsecondary impacts • How do students perform in postsecondary education? • Evolution of academic identity • How do students’ perceptions of themselves as learners change? • How does it differ by student characteristics?

  40. Gaps in the Literature--Impacts • College readiness in a variety of domains • How ready are students for college-level writing expectations? • How well can students manage their time? • How well can students advocate for themselves with their professors? • Impact on the college setting • What is the impact on adult students? • What is the impact on college instruction?

  41. Gaps in the Literature--Impacts • Extracurriculars (incl. sports and the arts) • To what extent do early college students participate in extracurriculars? • To what extent do students participate in sports or arts-related activities?

  42. Gaps in the literature-Implementation • Support strategies • What are effective strategies to help students entering below grade level achieve in honors-level courses (particularly math)? • How can schools support students while also creating independent learners? • How can schools build those non-academic college readiness skills?

  43. Gaps in the literature-Implementation • Instruction • How can students be prepared for college-level writing? • How can you support teachers in implementing more rigorous instruction? • Impact of turnover • What happens when leaders or key staff turn over? How well does the vision remain?

  44. Gaps in the literature-Implementation • College-high school collaboration • What factors support/hinder collaboration between faculty? • What are the results of collaboration? • Cost • How much do early colleges cost? • What is the cost-benefit?

  45. What additional questions need to be asked?

  46. For more information Julie Edmunds jedmunds@serve.org 336-574-8727

More Related