1 / 45

Some Issues in Charmonium Physics

Some Issues in Charmonium Physics. K-T Chao Peking University. 1. Puzzles in Double Charm Production in e + e  Annihilation Inclusive J/  cc{bar} production Exclusive J/   C ( C0 ,  C (2S),…) production 2. D-wave Charmonium production in e + e  Annihilation

jalen
Télécharger la présentation

Some Issues in Charmonium Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some Issues in Charmonium Physics K-T Chao Peking University

  2. 1. Puzzles in Double Charm Production in e+e Annihilation • Inclusive J/ cc{\bar} production • Exclusive J/ C (C0, C(2S),…) production 2. D-wave Charmonium production • in e+e Annihilation • in B meson decay • S-D Mixing 3. Search for hC in B exclusive decays and infrared divergences

  3. Puzzles in Double Charm Production in e+e Annihilation INCLUSIVE PRODUCTION : e+e J/cc Theory: via ONE virtual photon • Cho-Leibovich (1996) Yuan-Qiao-Chao (1997) Baek-Ko-Lee-Song (1998) • pQCD predicts: cross section at s  10.6 GeV 0.10-0.15pb • Belle data  0.9pb,PRL89(2002)142001 • larger than theory by almost one order of magnitude. Higher order corrections expected not large enough.

  4. Puzzles in Double Charm Production in e+e Annihilation EXCLUSIVEPROCESS e+e J/ C (C0, C(2S),…) Theory: via ONE virtual photon (Braaten-Lee (2003) PRD67, 054007) (Liu-He-Chao (2003) PLB557, 45) (Hagiwara-Kou-Qiao (2003) PLB570, 39) pQCD prediction smaller again by an order of magnitude than Belle cross section  0.033 pb for e+eJ/C(decaying to  4 charged)(PRL89, 142001)

  5. Puzzles in Double Charm Production in e+e Annihilation • Theory: via TWO photons • Enhanced by photon fragmentation (small photon virtuality 4mc2s ) • Suppressed by QED over QCD couplings • Exclusive J/ +J/ enhanced (Bodwin-Braaten-Lee, PRL90, 162001), the same order as for J/+ C(but ruled out later by data) • Inclusive J/ cc\bar via two photons prevail over via one photon when s  20GeV (Liu-He-Chao, PRD68, R031501)

  6. Puzzles in Double Charm Production in e+e Annihilation • Annihilation into TWO photons can NOT solve problems for both inclusive and exclusive double charm production • Both data larger than pQCD predictions by about an order of magnitude • Color octet contributions are negligible • pQCD factorization fails(?) • C=+ glueballs misidentified as C (?) (Brodsky et al.) Search for C=+ glueballs near 3 GeV from (2S) decay @ CLEOc & BESIII

  7. D-wave Charmonium production in e+e Annihilation and B decay • New finding by Belle: D-wave charmonium is observed in B decay for the first time (hep-ex/0307061) • B+(3770)K+ , BR = (0.48 ±0.11± 0.12) x 10-3, very large, even comparable to B+(2S)K+, BR=(0.66±0.06) x 10-3 • If this implies large 2S-1D mixing? • S-D mixing vs. Color-Octet mechanism in D-wave charmonium production in B meson decay and in e+e Annihilation

  8. S-D mixing between’= (2S) &’’=(3770) If ignoring D-wave contribution to leptonic widths  mixing angle   ± 19º

  9. Detailed calculations (including tensor force and coupled channel effects) indicating  absolutely value smaller than 10º(Eichten et al, Kuang-Yan, Moxhay-Rosner,…)Including D-wave contribution to leptonic widths   – 10ºor   +30º

  10.   +30º disfavored because it would give E1 transition width 5 times larger than the observed value of (2S)co (Ding-Qin-Chao, PRD44(1991)Measurement of (3770)cJ  at CLEOc & BESIII will be another helpful check for the S-D mixing

  11. tan2 =0.11, if   ± 19º tan2 =0.03, if   -- 10º Small S-D mixing can hardly explain the Belle data if only the Color-Singlet (CS) S-wave component contributes (via CS V-A currents) B+(3770)K+ , BR = (0.48 ±0.11± 0.12) x 10-3, B+(2S)K+, BR=(0.66±0.06) x 10-3

  12. D-wave heavy quarkonium production may be a crucial test of NRQCD color-octet mechanism.In certain processes (e.g. gluon fragmentation, B meson decay,…) the D-wave charmonium signal could be as strong as (2S)(Qiao-Yuan-Chao, PRD55(1997)4001) (Yuan-Qiao-Chao, PRD56(1997)329)

  13. Color-Octet (CO) mechanism may play important role for D-wave charmonium production in B decay due to large Wilson coefficient for CO effective V-A Hamiltonian and the NRQCD Fock state Expansion.CO coefficient >> CS coefficient

  14. The inclusive decay branching ratio was predictedBR(B(3770)X)=0.28% (Yuan-Qiao-Chao,1997), [c.f. BR(B+(2S)X)=(0.35±0.05)%][see also Ko-Lee-Song(1997)]

  15. NRQCD velocity scaling rules (with some uncertainties)

  16. D-wave charmonium production in e+e AnnihilationColor-Octet insignificant for double charm Color-singlet contributes 2-4 fb to e+e (3770)cc\bar (Hao-Liu-Chao, PLB546(2002)216) • Color-octet suppressed by color factor of 3/32, no significant contribution • S-D mixing will much help, since the observed rate of e+e(1S)cc\bar  0.9pb, (2S)cc\bar expected to be about a half of (1S)cc\bar.

  17. D-wave Charmonium production in e+e Annihilation and B meson decay • Observed large rate of B+(3770)K+ could be a strong support to either the Color-Octet mechanism or the large S-D mixing. • e+e (3770)cc\bar could be another test of S-D mixing (no Color-Octet contamination). • (3770)cJ  at CLEOc & BESIII will be another helpful check for the S-D mixing.

  18. Infrared Divergences in B CJ K and B hCK Decays in QCD Factorization(Song, Chao, Phys.Lett. B568 (2003)127)(Song, Meng, Gao, Chao, hep-ph/0309105) • BBNS (Beneke et al.) QCD factorization: • Good for Bpi pi, BD pi. • OK (infrared safe) for BJ/ K (Chay-Kim, Cheng-Yang)B C K (Song-Meng-Chao); Color transparency, small cc-bar size, viewed as color dipole. • Infrared divergences for B CJ K and B hCK Decaysin QCD factorization and NRQCD

  19. Z=M2/MB2  4mc 2 /mb2  is the gluon mass for infrared regularization

  20. If using the infrared divergence term to estimate the decay widthsas in the case of hadronic widths: (hc ggg)=5/6  (c1qqg)

  21. Very large branching ratio obtained for BhcK obtained! But new method based on NRQCD still expected to remove infrared divergences!

More Related