1 / 41

PETE 411 Well Drilling

PETE 411 Well Drilling. Lesson 21 Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure. Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure. Resistivity of Shale Temperature in the Return Mud Drilling Rate Increase d c - Exponent Sonic Travel Time Conductivity of Shale.

james-blankenship
Télécharger la présentation

PETE 411 Well Drilling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PETE 411Well Drilling Lesson 21Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure

  2. Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure Resistivity of Shale Temperature in the Return Mud Drilling Rate Increase dc - Exponent Sonic Travel Time Conductivity of Shale

  3. Read:Applied Drilling Engineering, Ch. 6 HW #11Slip Velocity Due 10-28-02

  4. Shale Resistivity vs. Depth 1. Establish trend line in normally pressured shale 2. Look for deviations from this trend line (semi-log)

  5. EXAMPLE Shale Resistivity vs. Depth 1. Establish normal trend line 2. Look for deviations (semi-log)

  6. Pore Pressure (lb/gal equivalent) 16 14 12 10 Shale Resistivity vs. Depth 1. Establish normal trend line 2. Look for deviations 3. Use OVERLAY to quantify pore pressure (use with caution) 9 ppg (normal)

  7. Depth, ft Shale Density , g/cc

  8. Depth, ft Mud Temperature in flowline, deg F

  9. Example 8.2 X Why?

  10. Example 8.8 X Thermal conductivity, heat capacity, pore pressure...

  11. Drilling Rate, ft/min PHYD - PPORE , psi

  12. DP = (P2 - P1)1,000 Effect of Differential Pressure

  13. Typical Drilling Rate Profiles - Shale Shale The drilling rate in a normally pressured, solid shale section will generally generate a very steady and smooth drilling rate curve. The penetration rate will be steady and not erratic (normally pressured, clean shale).

  14. Typical Drilling Rate Profiles - Sand Sand The drilling rate in a sand will probably generate an erratic drilling rate curve. Sands in the Gulf Coast area are generally very unconsolidated. This may cause sloughing, accompanied by erratic torque, and temporarily, erratic drilling rates.

  15. Typical Drilling Rate Profiles - Shaley Sands Shaley Sands This is generally the most troublesome type drilling rate curve to interpret. Many times this curve will look similar to a solid shale curve that is moving into a transition zone. Note: This is a prime example why you should not base your decision on only one drilling parameter, even though the drilling rate parameter is one of the better parameters.

  16. Typical Drilling Rate Profiles Transition Zone Shale If you are drilling close to balanced, there will probably be a very smooth, (gradual) increasein the drilling rate. This is due to the difference between the hydrostatic head and the pore pressure becoming smaller.

  17. Typical Drilling Rate Profiles As the pressure becomes very small, the gas in the pores has a tendency to expand which causes the shale particles to pop from the wall. This is called sloughing shale. The transition zone generally has a higher porosity, making drilling rates higher. In a clean shale the ROP will increase in a smooth manner. Transition Zone Shale

  18. Typical Drilling Rate Profiles Note: If you are drilling overbalancedin a transition it will be very difficult to pick up the transition zone initially. This will allow you to move well into the transition zone before detecting the problem.

  19. Typical Drilling Rate Profiles This could cause you to move into a permeable zone which would probably result in a kick. The conditions you create with overbalanced hydrostatic head will so disguisethe pending danger that you may not notice the small effect of the drilling rate curve change. This will allow you to move well into that transition zone without realizing it.

  20. Determination of Abnormal Pore Pressure Using the dc - exponent From Ben Eaton:

  21. Where

  22. Example Calculate the pore pressure at depth X using the data in this graph. Assume: West Texas location with normal overburden of 1.0 psi/ft. X = 12,000 ft. X 1.2 1.5 dc

  23. Example From Ben Eaton:

  24. Example

  25. E.S. Pennebaker Used seismic field data for the detection of abnormal pressures. Under normally pressured conditions the sonic velocity increases with depth. (i.e. Travel time decreases with depth) (why?)

  26. E.S. Pennebaker Any departure from this trend is an indication of possible abnormal pressures. Pennebaker used overlays to estimate abnormal pore pressures from the difference between normal and actual travel times.

  27. Depth, ft Interval Travel Time, msec per ft

  28. Ben Eaton also found a way to determine pore pressure from interval travel times. Example: In a Gulf Coast well, the speed of sound is 10,000 ft/sec at a depth of 13,500 ft. The normal speed of sound at this depth, based on extrapolated trends, would be 12,000 ft/sec. What is the pore pressure at this depth? Assume:S/D = 1.0 psi/ft

  29. Ben Eaton From Ben Eaton, ( Dt a 1/v )

  30. Ben Eaton r = (0.6904 / 0.052) = 13.28 lb/gal p = 0.6904 * 13,500 = 9,320 psig From Ben Eaton Note: Exponent is 3.0 this time, NOT 1.2!

  31. Equations for Pore Pressure Determination

  32. Pore Pressure Determination

  33. EXAMPLE 3 - An Application... Mud Weight = 10 lb/gal. (0.52 psi/ft) Surface csg. Set at 2,500 ft. Fracture gradient below surf. Csg = 0.73 psi/ft Drilling at 10,000 ft in pressure transition zone * Mud weight may be less than pore pressure! DETERMINEMaximum safe underbalance between mud weight and pore pressure if well kicks from formation at 10,000 ft.

  34. 0.73 – 0.52 = 0.21 (psi/ft) 2,500 Casing Seat FractureGradient = 0.73 psi/ft Depth, ft Mud Wt. Grad = 0.52 psi/ft 10,000 5,200 Pressure, psi

  35. Example 3 - Solution The danger here is fracturing the formation near the casing seat at 2,500 ft. The fracture gradient at this depth is 0.73 psi/ft, and the mud weight gradient is 0.52 psi/ft. So, the additional permissible pressure gradient is 0.73 – 0.52 = 0.21 psi/ft, at the casing seat. This corresponds to an additional pressure of DP = 0.21 psi/ft * 2,500 ft = 525 psi

  36. Example 3 – Solution – cont’d This additional pressure, at 10,000 ft, is also 525 psi, and would amount to an additional pressure gradient of: 525 psi / 10,000 ft = 0.0525 psi/ft This represents an equivalent mud weight of 0.0525 / 0.052 = 1.01 lb/gal This is the kick tolerance for a small kick!

  37. Problem #3 - Alternate Solution • When a well kicks, the well is shut in and the wellbore pressure increases until the new BHP equals the new formation pressure. • At that point influx of formation fluids into the wellbore ceases. • Since the mud gradient in the wellbore has not changed, the pressure increases uniformly everywhere.

  38. Casing Seat at 2,500 ft 525 After Kick and Stabilization Depth, ft Before Kick Kick at 10,000 ft DP 525 Wellbore Pressure, psi

  39. At 2,500 ftInitial mud pressure = 0.52 psi/ft * 2,500 ft = 1,300 psiFracture pressure = 0.73 psi/ft * 2,500 ft = 1,825 psiMaximum allowable increase in pressure = 525 psi At 10,000 ft Maximum allowable increase in pressure = 525 psi (since the pressure increases uniformly everywhere). This corresponds to an increase in mud weight of 525 / (0.052 * 10,000) = 1.01 lb/gal = maximum increase in EMW = kick tolarance for a small kick size.

  40. 1,825 psi Casing Seat at 2,500 ft 1,300 psi Depth, ft 5,200 psi 5,725 psi Kick at 10,000 ft DP Wellbore Pressure, psi

  41. After Large Kick and Stabilization Casing Seat at 2,500 ft After Small Kick and Stabilization Depth, ft Before Kick Kick at 10,000 ft DP Wellbore Pressure, psi

More Related