1 / 17

C-ID Course Identification Numbering System: The New Kid in Town

C-ID Course Identification Numbering System: The New Kid in Town. ASCCC Curriculum Institute July 11, 2008 Kate Clark. History—the Cliff’s Notes Version:. Background Context Legislative Concerns Common Course Numbering Clear Pathways to Majors

jamesbwilson
Télécharger la présentation

C-ID Course Identification Numbering System: The New Kid in Town

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. C-IDCourse Identification Numbering System: The New Kid in Town ASCCC Curriculum Institute July 11, 2008 Kate Clark

  2. History—the Cliff’s Notes Version: • Background Context • Legislative Concerns • Common Course Numbering • Clear Pathways to Majors • UC/CSU Faculty Concerns: ICAS conference of discipline leaders in 1998

  3. Historical Participant: CAN • CAN (California Articulation Numbering System (1985-2005) • Advantages: Articulation, Shared number, Widely used • Disadvantages: Lacked UC participation, Not sufficiently descriptive, Outdated, limited faculty review Last Gasp Effort: “New CAN Model” Faculty Discipline Review Groups Robust Descriptors Regular Cycle of Review CAN becomes a CCC Orphan: January 2005

  4. Historical Participant: IMPAC: 2000-2006 ICAS project, launched after faculty summit to identify problems with student transfer • Intersegmental • M ajor • P reparation • A rticulated • C urriculum • Advantages and Disadvantages www.cal-impac.org

  5. LDTP: CSU’s Lower Division Transfer Pattern Project 2005-- • CSU Initial Effort to • Reduce “unnecessary units” transferred in • Speed time to degree • Provide clear paths • Manage enrollment • Later • Effort to influence course content • Address faculty concerns about CAN • Achieve greater comparability among CSU courses and expectations

  6. LDTP Advantages • LDTP Disadvantages http://www.calstate.edu/acadaff/ldtp/

  7. UC Transfer Initiatives • UC Streamlining (Articulation) • UC Transfer Preparation Paths • Specific paths for 10 majors—clear advisory information • www.uctransfer.org • Preserved the vitality of difference but reduced surprises

  8. C-ID • Early Concepts: 2002- 2005 Objective: “The Best of All Possible Worlds”  Build upon CAN’s: • Simple, supranumber used widely • Web-based access • FDRG-based model of faculty development • Articulation-oriented objectives  Build upon IMPAC’s • Intersegmental/Interdisciplinary discussions • Face-to-face interaction  Build upon LDTP’s • On-line, robust course descriptors • A course validation process

  9. C-ID’s Early Concepts, cont’d.  Build upon UC’s • Use of existing articulation as a starting point • Identification of common features of major preparation to build paths • C-ID • Grids for chosen disciplines, indicating articulation • Respect for work done—complement not supplant LDTP • Campus-Specific Courses for CSU and UC • Focus on non-major coursework—GE and elective • On-line, robust course descriptors • A course validation process • Wide, intersegmental, interdisciplinary participation

  10. C-ID Incubation • ICAS sponsored and supported • Participation of CIAC-affiliated AOs • “Faculty-driven, staff-supported” project • Funding: System Office RFA/Grant Los Rios Community College District Contracted with ASCCC Two-year Pilot Project Further the work already done in several disciplines

  11. Status of C-ID Goals • #1Secure the commitment of faculty representing the CCC, CSU, UC and AICCU member institutions to participate in the organizational infrastructure that supports a common course numbering system and determines its long-term sustainability. Advisory Committee On-going Commitments Work with ASSIST Build relationships with other groups Explore outside funding

  12. #2Design, develop and prepare for implementation and use by all segments an overarching common numbering system Establish C-ID Office Secure list of CCC “Top 20 Majors” Develop a Training Manual for FDRGs Appoint and Train FDRGs Beta test electronic mechanism for faculty’s use in designing, reviewing, revising descriptors

  13. #3 Create and maintain a web portal for public and internal use. Database of faculty, professional groups Website for faculty, articulation, counselors Intranet forum for on-line faculty exchange

  14. Where is C-ID now? • Website as a reflection of accomplishments, efforts and direction www.c-id.net

  15. Where does C-ID go next? 2008-09 • REVIEWS: • Summer • Early Fall • Compilation, Review, Reconsideration • Posting of Current Descriptors • Mechanism for Initial Validation to be Finalized • Roll-overs on honor system • Subsequent validation mechanism • NEXT CYCLES • Begin new FDRG appointments: • Sociology, Earth Sciences, Theatre/Drama • Continuing: Psychology, English (Creative Writing, Linguistics)

  16. USING COMPLETED, ACTIVE COURSE DESCRIPTORS • Curriculum Development • Increased Articulation • Increased Communication among colleges and universities offering courses • PROMOTING ACTIVE USE OF THE SITE AND THE NUMBER • RALLYING SUPPORT • Faculty : Participants, Reviewers, Users • Curriculum Chairs and Committees • Articulation Officers • System Office

  17. Other Questions?Thank you!

More Related