remote control locomotive technology public safety advisory n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Remote Control Locomotive Technology Public Safety Advisory PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Remote Control Locomotive Technology Public Safety Advisory

Remote Control Locomotive Technology Public Safety Advisory

339 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Remote Control Locomotive Technology Public Safety Advisory

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Remote Control Locomotive TechnologyPublic Safety Advisory Remote Control Locomotives Put Los Angeles Residents At Risk!

  2. Why are we here today? • To discuss the BLE’s public safety concerns regarding Union Pacific’s implementation of remote control train operations at their Los Angeles Terminal Operations • To inform this committee of the potential dangers that are associated with Remote Control Locomotive Technology • To help facilitate a process which will ensure the safest implementation of this technology

  3. Why should you be concerned • Railroads are major transporters of hazardous materials and deadly chemicals • On 2-14-01 the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) released a Safety Advisory which states, “FRA has limited data on which to base an objective safety analysis and must therefore proceed prudently”, regarding remote control operations • Since implementing this technology U.S. railroads have experienced numerous Remote Control Locomotive (RCL) related accidents

  4. FRA safety recommendation for notifying railroad workers and the public of Remote Control Locomotive Operations Is this adequate protection?

  5. Emergency Responders • Emergency responders need to be made aware of the heightened danger that is associated with Unmanned Remote Control Locomotive operations • Situation Awareness – With remote control operations, there is no longer an engineer in the locomotive cab to respond to crisis • Should the ground person remotely operating the locomotive be involved in an accident or hazardous spill, that person may not be able to respond if he or she is rendered incapacitated

  6. RCO – Accident Cars being switched by RCO ran into Trim Locomotive June 9, 2002 (UP) Hinkle Yard – Hermiston, OR

  7. RCO – Accident Approximately 400 gallons of highly flammable liquid fuel Naphtha leaked from this tank car containing 25,000 gallons of the hazardous material when three cars derailed in a remote control wreck.The Cumberland Fire Department and the Allegany County Hazardous Incident Response Team responded to control the leaking hazmat. November 1, 2001 (CSX) Cumberland, MD

  8. RCO – Accident These cars were unknowingly uncoupled by the remote operation, rolled out of the hump yard and collided with the cars they uncoupled from at 25 MPH, derailing 17 cars. The derailed cars hit another train on one main line derailing 3 cars on that train. The main line on the other side of the wreck was also blocked. Amtrak regularly travels on that main line. December 21, 2002 (BNSF) Yard – Galesburg, IL

  9. RCO – Accident A remote control locomotive and several cars rolled downhill 3 miles before colliding with a tractor trailer at the entrance of a lumber mill. August 6, 2002 (Puget Sound & Pacific) – Shelton, WA

  10. RCO – Accident This Remote Control Operator said he pressed the stop button, but the train didn’t stop. Notice the Hazmat placard on the car that remained on the rails. October 31, 2002 (BNSF) - Lincoln, NE

  11. Remote Control Bans and Resolutions

  12. The following cities and counties have banned remote control locomotives from operating in their communities;

  13. Baton Rouge RCO Wreck • On February 13, 2003, just five months after the Metro Council voted to ban remote-controlled locomotives in Baton Rouge, an unmanned train involving empty chemical cars derailed on a highway overpass, damaging cars below and closing Interstate 110 for over 12 hours. • After the accident, Mayor Pro Tempore Lorri Burgess said, "I don't want Baton Rouge to make the stories that get told from California to New York about train wrecks. We're the first in doing something right. Now this should give more credibility to our resolution.“

  14. Government Regulation • Currently there are no rules or regulations mandated for remote control operations • The FRA and DOT have turned a blind eye to the accidents and incidents involving RCO • Responsible government agencies and citizens need to contact the Federal Government to force the FRA to implement responsible rules and regulations for remote control operations

  15. What would a responsible RCO implementation look like? The BLE maintains that a responsible RCO implementation is one that weighs the public safety issues and the negative impact that the implementation of remote controlled train operations could have on your community. We are asking that the elected representatives of Los Angeles create a forum and begin an educational process which brings all of the parties into the RCLT debate in order to create a public awareness and better understanding of this issue.

  16. Solution • The BLE is asking all City, County, State and Federal government entities to actively participate in a process which directs the FRA to establish comprehensive and mandatory safety regulations for the use of Remote Control Locomotive Technology. • Contact: The Honorable Alan Rutter • Federal Railroad Administrator • U.S. Department of Transportation • 400 Seventh Street, N.W. • Washington, D.C. 20590 • Phone:202-366-0881 • Re: Petition the FRA for Rulemaking on the Use of Remote Control Locomotives - Docket No. FRA-00-8422

  17. Thank you from the Members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers