1 / 12

Commissioning and Facilities Issues Overview for Lyon and Associated Sites

This document details key commissioning and facilities issues encountered across the Lyon site and affiliated facilities, including GRIF, IN2P3, and T2 sites. It addresses resource mismatches between various GRIF subclusters and CMS expectations, communication issues regarding scheduling, and the performance of job analysis within the last month. Additionally, it highlights concerns regarding storage configurations and the actions of site managers in response to job failures. The purpose is to foster discussion and improvement in commissioning processes.

jane-ashley
Télécharger la présentation

Commissioning and Facilities Issues Overview for Lyon and Associated Sites

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Site and Networking CommissioningAppendix specific to Lyon visit Stefano Belforte Daniele Bonacorsi Frank Wuerthwein Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  2. SiteDB : Lyon Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  3. SiteDB : GRIF Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  4. SiteDB: Belgium Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  5. SiteDB : Beijing Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  6. Site DB : IN2P3 – T2 Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  7. Schedule/Communication Issues • GRIF • Do we need to know the GRIF sub-cluster structure ? • Talk with specific site managers ? • Beijing • What does association mean here ? WAN endpoint or integration/support ? • What are plans/schedule for visible activity ? Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  8. Issues/concerns from DDT and LT • GRIF • We have some indication of mismatch between the resources made available by various GRIF subclusters and the expectation from CMS for (even a ) small T2 • Network, Storage, CPU • Is this so ? • Do we need a dedicated discussion ? Meeting ? • How much is this relevant in view of a future uniform storage element for GRIF sites ? Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  9. SAM for CMS Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  10. SAM issues • No specific issue • But sites do not seem to take this seriously • They fail and take no action • An action can also be a complain, or a question • Would you rather wait for users to complain ? Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  11. Job Robot Issues Analysis jobs in last months In2P3-CC–T2 Be-ULB-UVB In2P3-CC Be-UCL GRIF http://tinyurl.com/222xcj • Seems the exercise was useful for GRIF • Would you agree ? • When analysis at GRIF ? • Why so much difference between the two Belgian sites ? • Both for JR and analysis Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

  12. Storage issues • GRIF • Single storage vs. 4 small buffers • IN2P3 • How will users send jobs to T2 rather then T1 ? • Does it matter ? (both CE matches requirements) Commissioning/Facilities Issues LYON

More Related