Impeachment in Legal Proceedings
190 likes | 223 Vues
Learn about the process of impeachment, methods, and rules for impeaching witnesses in legal cases. Discover how to weaken credibility and present extrinsic evidence effectively.
Impeachment in Legal Proceedings
E N D
Presentation Transcript
CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT P. JANICKE 2011
DEFINITION AND METHODS • IMPEACHMENT IS THE PROCESS OF ATTEMPTING TO WEAKEN THE PERCEIVED CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS • MOST COMMONLY DONE ON CROSS • AT LEAST SIX METHODS OF IMPEACHMENT, EACH WITH ITS OWN RULES LIMITING REACH Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
MEANING OF “EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE” • DOING THE IMPEACHMENT BY • CALLING A WITNESS TO IMPEACH THE TARGET WITNESS, OR • INTRODUCING A DOCUMENT TO DO SO Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
THE GENERAL MODES • ARE ATTACKS ON THE WITNESS’S BELIEVABILITY DUE TO SOME GENERAL WEAKNESS AS A WITNESS • I.E., A WEAKNESS NOT LIMITED TO THIS PARTICULAR CASE Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
PROVE IMPAIRED GENERAL COMPETENCY • UNABLE TO OBSERVE OR REMEMBER THINGS IN GENERAL, NOT LIMITED TO THIS CASE • EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
2. POOR CHARACTER FOR VERACITY a. BAD REPUTATION FOR TRUTHFULNESS – EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE ALLOWED, BUT NO SPECIFICS b. PRIOR DISHONEST NON-CONVICTION ACTS, ESTABLISHED ON CROSS. EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IS NOT ALLOWED Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
CONVICTION OF A CRIME • ANY CRIME INVOLVING DISHONESTY • NO WEIGHING PROBATIVE VALUE OR PREJUDICE • ANY FELONY, BUT SUBJECT TO WEIGHING PROBATIVENESS AGAINST RISK OF PREJUDICE • TEN-YEAR LIMIT IN EITHER CASE Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
IF THE WITNESS ADMITS TO IT, CANNOT USE EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE TO PROVE THE CONVICTION • IF THE WITNESS DOES NOT ADMIT, CAN USE RECORD ONLY (NO ADD’L WITNESS) – • CRIME; DATE OF CONVICTION; SENTENCE. NO DETAILS Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
SPECIFIC MODES • ATTACKS ON THE CREDIBILITY OF THE WITNESS IN THIS CASE ONLY • THESE ASSUME THAT IN GENERAL THE WITNESS MIGHT HAVE GOOD VERACITY Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
MODES OF SPECIFIC IMPEACHMENT • PROVE IMPAIRED SPECIFIC COMPETENCY, i.e., ON THE OCCASION IN QUESTION • DRUNK • NIGHT-TIME • LOOKING THE OTHER WAY • EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE ALLOWED Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
BIAS OR PREJUDICE • FRIEND OR RELATIVE OF A PARTY • E.G.: BUSINESS OBJECTIVE IF ONE SIDE WINS • E.G.: SIMILARLY SITUATED NEIGHBORS • EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE ALLOWED Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
6. PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT OF A WITNESS • EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE ALLOWED; BUT --- • MUST AFFORD TARGET WIT. A CHANCE DURING TRIAL TO EXPLAIN THE INCONSISTENCY • THEREFORE, CAN’T USE THIS MODE IF WITNESS HAS BEEN EXCUSED AND IS BEYOND SUBPOENA REACH Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
WHO CAN BE IMPEACHED ? • ANY WITNESS WHO ANSWERS ANY QUESTION PLACES HIS CREDIBILITY IN ISSUE, AND CAN BE IMPEACHED • CAN IMPEACH YOUR OWN WITNESS Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
CAN IMPEACH AN IMPEACHING WITNESS • A NON-TESTIFYING PARTY GENERALLY CANNOT BE IMPEACHED Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
SERIATIM IMPEACHMENT METHODS • ARE GENERALLY ALLOWED, SUBJECT TO DISCRETION ON WASTE OF TIME • MOST COMMONLY DONE WHEN FIRST METHOD FAILS Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
EXAMPLE #1 : • D. TESTIFIES • ON CROSS, PROSECUTOR TRIES TO SHOW PRIOR DISHONEST ACTS – FALSE INCOME TAX RETURN • D. DENIES/ADMITS FILING FALSE RETURN • PROSECUTOR CAN NOW SWITCH TO CONVICTION OF A CRIME MODE (FILING FALSE RETURN) Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
EXAMPLE #2 • IMPEACH A WITNESS FIRST WITH PRIOR DISHONEST ACTS (CROSS) • THEN WITH FELONY CONVICTIONS • THEN WITH PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
SOME SURPRISING THINGS • NON-MIRANDIZED STATEMENT CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH A TESTIFYING D. • PRE-MIRANDA-WARNING SILENCE CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH A TESTIFYING D. Chap. 8 -- Impeachment
ILLEGALLY SEIZED ITEMS CAN BE USED TO IMPEACH A TESTIFYING D. • E.G.: ILLEGALLY SEIZED SHIRT WITH NIFTY CUT-OUTS • E.G.: ILLEGALLY SEIZED COCAINE • ALL 3 OF ABOVE ARE SAID TO BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT INTEGRITY OF TRIAL SYSTEM Chap. 8 -- Impeachment