1 / 41

Charge asymmetry and symmetry properties

Charge asymmetry and symmetry properties. Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson IRFU, SPhN-Saclay, and IN2P3-IPNO France. DUBNA, September 1-5, 2009. e -. e -. e +. p. q 2 >0. q 2 <0. p. e -. p. p. Scattering and annihilation. Asymptotics - QCD - analyticity. Space-like. (+). (+).

jase
Télécharger la présentation

Charge asymmetry and symmetry properties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Charge asymmetry and symmetry properties Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson IRFU, SPhN-Saclay, and IN2P3-IPNO France DUBNA, September 1-5, 2009 Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  2. e- e- e+ p q2>0 q2<0 p e- p p Scattering and annihilation Asymptotics - QCD - analyticity Space-like (+) (+) Time-like p+p ↔ e++e- +p Unphysical region _ _ q2=4mp2 q2 e+p  e+p p+p ↔ e++e- Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  3. Crossing Symmetry Scattering and annihilation channels: - Described by the same amplitude : - function of two kinematical variables, sandt - which scan different kinematical regions k2→ – k2 p2 p2→ – Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  4. 1g-2g interference M. P. Rekalo, E. T.-G. and D. Prout, Phys. Rev. C60, 042202 (1999) 2g 1g { { 1{g Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  5. Symmetry relations (annihilation) • Differential cross section at complementary angles: The SUM cancels the 2g contribution: The DIFFERENCE enhances the 2g contribution: Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  6. Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  7. Radiative Return (ISR) e+ +e- p + p +  B. Aubert ( BABAR Collaboration) Phys Rev. D73, 012005 (2006) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  8. Angular distribution 1.877÷1.950 1.950÷2.025 2.025÷2.100 Events/0.2 vs. cos q 2.100÷2.200 2.200÷2.400 2.400÷3.000 • 2g-exchange? Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  9. Mpp=1.877-1.9 A=0.01±0.02 Mpp=2.4-3 E. T.-G., E.A. Kuraev, S. Bakmaev, S. Pacetti, Phys. Lett. B (2008) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  10. Linearity of the Rosenbluth fit Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  11. Parametrization of 2g-contribution for e+p From the data: deviation from linearity << 1%! E. T.-G., G. Gakh, Phys. Rev. C 72, 015209 (2005) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  12. 2γ-Gamma Models and Data C. Perdrisat,L. Pentchev Expt. Jlab 04-019 measured Ratio PL/PT for Q2=2.49 GeV2 at 3 values of ε PRELIMINARY NO ε-dependence at 0.01 level NO evidence of 2g contribution The inclusion of hard 2γ exchange: Chen et al (2003) with GPDs, Blunden et al (2003) in hadronic model Bystriskyi et al., LSF PR C75, 015207 (2007) 8/23/2014 12 Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  13. Linear fit to e+4He scattering Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  14. Electron/Positron scattering • What about data: electron positron scattering (elastic or inelastic) in the same experimental conditions? • If R ≠1 is there any other source of asymmetry? • Any evidence of two photon exchange (real part of hard box diagram)? Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  15. Electron/Positron scattering Two photon exchange: Born approximation 2g exchange: Asymmetry The effect is enhanced in the ratio Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  16. World data e+e- scattering Fitting with a constant R=0.997 DR=0.003 c2 =1.03 Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  17. Elastic scattering q2 =1, 3, 5 GeV2 e=0.2, 0.5, 0.8 R=(-0.071 ± 0.016 )e +(1.058±0.014) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  18. Electron/Positron scattering E.A. Kuraev, V.V.Bytev, S.Bakmaev and E.T-G, PRC 78, 015295 (2008). C=0.97,0.99 e=0.4 q2=3 GeV2 2g exchange Soft photon emission Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  19. Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  20. c2=1.1 c2=4. Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  21. Simulation with PANDA p+p e++ e- Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  22. N=a0+a2cosq sin2q+a1 cos2q, a2~2g 1g 2g 0.02 q2=5.4 GeV2 2g 0.2 2g 0.05 Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  23. Conclusions • Determination of the validity of one photon exchange approximation: basic question for deriving information on the hadron structure • in annihilation processes all information is contained in a precise measurement of the angular distribution • Comparison of scatteringand annihilation channels: model independent statements • No evidence of two photon exchange (real part) in the data. • Precise calculation of radiative corrections Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  24. Simulations q2=5.4,8.2,13.8 GeV2 Main effect: odd cosq - distribution • Approximations: • Neglect contributions to GE,GM • Consider only real part Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  25. N=a0+a2cosq sin2q+a1 cos2q, a2~2g 2g visible from F3/GM ~ 0.05 Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  26. Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  27. Fitting the angular distributions.. The form of the differential cross section: is equivalent to: Cross section at 900 Angular asymmetry E. T-G. and M. P. Rekalo, Phys. Lett. B 504, 291 (2001) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  28. Angular asymmetry andCharge asymmetry Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  29. Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  30. Inelastic e+e- scattering R=1.002±0.002 R=(-0.0009 ± 0.001 )q2 +(1.005±0.003) R=(0.005 ± 0.014 )XBj +(1.002±0.004) c2=0.84 Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  31. Elastic e -4He scattering ( L.J. Kaufman) Ayexp(4He) =-13.51 ± 1.34 (stat) ± 0.37(syst) ppmq=6°, Q2=0.077 GeV2  Im F1 (s,q2) ~F(q2) If Im F1 (s,q2) ~ Re F1 (s,q2) 1g ~ 2g term ! Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  32. Matrix element: spins 0 and 1/2 Two helicity amplitudes, functions of s and t ~m q1+q2 F(0)=Ze Electromagnetic He form factor Holds for crossed channel, q1→ -q1 q2→ -q2 Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  33. Two photon exchange • The calculation of the box amplitude requires the description of intermediate nucleon excitation and of their FFs at any Q2 • Different calculations give quantitatively different results Theory not enough constrained! Model independent statements Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  34. Model independent statements In presence of 2g exchange : • Non linearityin the Rosenbluth fit • - charge asymmetry • (and/or odd powers of cosq) • in the crossed channel • Non vanishing odd polarization observables • Different cross section for electron/positron – proton elastic(inelastic) scattering M. P. Rekalo, E. T.-G. , EPJA (2004), Nucl. Phys. A (2003) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  35. Unpolarized cross section Two photon exchange p2 p1 q Lab system F1~m, F~a0, f~a Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  36. Transversal Beam asymmetry(2g exchange) Normal component Spin vector of e beam T-odd ,~m, imaginary part of the spin flip 2g amplitude If ground state He,predicted: Ayth~10 -10 E.D. Cooper, C.J. Horowitz, PRC72,034602 (2005) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  37. Elastic e -4He scattering ( L.J. Kaufman) Ayexp(4He) =-13.51 ± 1.34 (stat) ± 0.37(syst) ppmq=6°, Q2=0.077 GeV2 → contibution from excited states… Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  38. Two photon exchange • The calculation of the box amplitude requires the description of intermediate nucleon excitation and of their FFs at any Q2 • Different calculations give quantitatively different results Theory not enough constrained! Model independent statements Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  39. How to proceed? Our Suggestion: • Search for model independent statements • Exact calculation in frame of QED (p~m) • Prove that QED box is upper limit of QCD box diagram Our Conclusion • Two photon contribution is negligible (real part) • Radiative corrections are huge: take into account higher order effects (Structure Functions method) E.A. Kuraev, Yu. Bystritsky, V. Bytev, E. T.-G. , (2006-2008) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  40. 1g-2g interference (e-d) D/A C/A M. P. Rekalo, E. T-G and D. Prout, Phys. Rev. C60, 042202 (1999) Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

  41. Unpolarized cross section • Induces four new terms • Odd function of q: • Does not contribute at q =90° Two Photon Exchange: Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO

More Related