1 / 12

What is a c oncept?

What is a c oncept?. Concepts are: Building blocks of theory Labels that we give to elements of the social world Categories for the organization of ideas and observations (Bulmer , 1984 ) Concepts are useful for: Providing an explanation of a certain aspect of the social world

jasia
Télécharger la présentation

What is a c oncept?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What is a concept? • Concepts are: • Building blocks of theory • Labels that we give to elements of the social world • Categories for the organization of ideas and observations (Bulmer, 1984) • Concepts are useful for: • Providing an explanation of a certain aspect of the social world • Standing for things we want to explain • Giving a basis for measuring variation Page 163

  2. Why measure? • To delineate fine differences between people, organizations, or any other unit of analysis • To provide a consistent device for gauging distinctions • To produce precise estimates of the degree of the relationship between concepts Page 164

  3. Indicators of concepts • Produced by the operational definition of a concept • Less directly quantifiable than measures • Common sense understandings of the form a concept might take • Multiple-indicator measures • concept may have different dimensions Pages 164, 165

  4. Why use more than one indicator? • Single indicators may incorrectly classify many individuals • Single indicators may capture only a portion of the underlying concept or be too general • Multiple indicators can make finer distinctions between individuals • Multiple indicators can capture different dimensions of a concept Pages 166, 167

  5. What doesreliabilitymean? • Stability • is the measure stable over time? • e.g. test–retest method • Internal reliability • are the indicators consistent? • e.g. split-half method • Inter-observer consistency • is the measure consistent between observers? Key concept 7.3 Page 169

  6. What does validitymean? Does the indicator measure the concept? It does if it has: • Face validity (right for the concept?) • Concurrent validity (supported by a relevant criterion today?) • Predictive validity (likely to be supported by a relevant criterion tomorrow?) • Construct validity (are useful hypotheses produced?) • Convergent validity (supported by results from other methods? Page 171, 172

  7. Causality • Explanation • why things are the way they are • Direction of causal influence • relationship between dependent & independent variables • Confidence • in the researcher's causal inferences Pages 175, 176

  8. Generalization • Can findings be generalized beyond the confines of the particular context? • Can findings be generalized from sample to population? • How representative are samples? Page 176

  9. Replication • Minimizing contamination from researcher biases or values • Explicit description of procedures • Control of conditions of study • Ability to replicate in differing contexts Page 177

  10. The process of quantitative research Figure 7.1, page 161

  11. Criticisms of quantitative research • Failure to distinguish between objects in the natural world and social phenomena • Artificial and spurious sense of precision and accuracy • Lack of ecological validity • reliance on instruments and measurements • Static view of social life Pages 178, 179

  12. Published accounts of quantitative research rarely report evidence of reliability and validity (Podsakoff & Dalton, 1987) • Researchers are primarily interested in the substantive content and findings of their research • Running tests of reliability and validity may seem an unappealing alternative! • But researchers remain committed to the principles of good practice Pages180, 181

More Related