1 / 23

Exploring the Future of Library Assessment: Innovative Practices for Success

In this presentation from the CUNY Libraries Conference, experts from the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, including Undergraduate Services Librarian Kate Peterson, Engineering Librarian Jan Fransen, and Technology Lead for eLearning Shane Nackerud, share insights on large-scale library assessment projects. Covering the past, present, and future of library data collection and analysis, they discuss methodologies for measuring library impact on student success and innovative strategies for enhancing library services.

jason
Télécharger la présentation

Exploring the Future of Library Assessment: Innovative Practices for Success

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Now What!?! Exploring the Next Steps for Large-Scale Library Assessment Projects Kate Peterson, Undergraduate Services Librarian Jan Fransen, Engineering Librarian Shane Nackerud, Technology Lead for eLearning Kristen Mastel, Outreach and Instruction Librarian University of Minnesota-Twin Cities CUNY LIBRARIES CONFERENCE REINVENTING LIBRARIES: REINVENTING ASSESSMENT INNOVATIVE PRACTICES AND IDEAS THAT CHALLENGE THE STATUS QUO June 6, 2014

  2. Agenda • The Past • The Present • The Future

  3. Part 1: The Past

  4. Image by chrisgallevo on Flickr

  5. Image by phalanxstudiosllc on Flickr

  6. “Trackable” Data* • Circulation (including ILL and renewals) • Digital (website, e-journal, database, e-book) • Reference (online and consulting, when an ID was captured) • Instruction (workshops, course-integrated, Intro to Library Research) • Workstation (only “library as place” measure) *Privacy Considerations

  7. 77% Undergrads made use of the libraries. 85% of grad students. .23 Increase in GPA associated with one use of the library or more 1.54 Times more likely to re-enroll for students who used the library at least once 7.58 Times more likely to re-enroll for students who took Intro to Library Research 2 online workshop

  8. Library Data and Student Success: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/ldss/ • Orientation • Dean’s meetings, etc. • Making the case for instruction • First Year Experience • Engineering • SERU data

  9. Part 2: Present

  10. Image by caughtinsuspension on Flickr academic advising

  11. 2014: Data collection is hard Easier we make it for patrons…harder for us • New authentication system • New ILS (Ex Libris--Alma) • New website and discovery system (Primo Central) • Still lots of unknowns (VPN, on campus, library as place, etc.)

  12. Part 3: Future

  13. CC Image courtesy of ena Bilobrk on Flickr

  14. Image by Doug Food on Flickr

  15. Image by Moira Clunie on Flickr

  16. Library Data and Student Success Project • Kate Peterson (katep@umn.edu) • Shane Nackerud (snackeru@umn.edu) • Jan Fransen (fransen@umn.edu) • Kristen Mastel (meye0539@umn.edu) • Krista Soria (botx0006@umn.edu) http://blog.lib.umn.edu/ldss/

More Related