640 likes | 652 Vues
A New Code for Axisymmetric Numerical Relativity. Eric Hircshmann, BYU Steve Liebling, LIU Frans Pretorius, UBC Matthew Choptuik CIAR/UBC. Black Holes III Kananaskis, Alberta May 22, 2001. Outline. Motivation Previous Work (other axisymmetric codes) Formalism & equations of motion
E N D
A New Code for Axisymmetric Numerical Relativity Eric Hircshmann, BYU Steve Liebling, LIU Frans Pretorius, UBC Matthew Choptuik CIAR/UBC Black Holes III Kananaskis, Alberta May 22, 2001
Outline • Motivation • Previous Work (other axisymmetric codes) • Formalism & equations of motion • Numerical considerations • Early results • Black hole excision results • Adaptive mesh refinement results • Future work
Motivation • Construct accurate, robust code for axisymmetric calculations in GR • Full 3D calculations still require more computer resources than typically available (especially in Canada!) • Interesting calculations to be done!
Long Term Goals • Critical Phenomena • Test non-linear stability of known spherical solutions • Look for new solutions with new matter sources • Study effects of rotation • Repeat Abrahams & Evans gravitational-wave collapse calculations with higher resolution
Long Term Goals • Cosmic Censorship • Reexamine Shapiro & Teukolsky computations suggesting naked singularity formation in highly prolate collapse but using matter with better convergence properties • ??? (“Expect the Unexpected”)
Development of Techniques & Algorithms for General Use • Coordinate choices (lapse and shift) • Black hole excision techniques • Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithms
Previous Work (“Space + Time” Approaches) • NCSA / Wash U / Potsdam … (Smarr & Eppley (1978), Hobill, Seidel, Bernstein, Brandt …) • Focused on head-on black hole collisions using “boundary conforming” (Cadez) coordinates • Culminates in work by Brandt & Anninos (98-99); head-on collisions of different-massed black holes, estimation of recoil due to gravity-wave emission
Previous Work • Nakamura & collaborators (early 80’s) • Rotating collapse of perfect fluid using (2+1)+1 approach • Stark & Piran (mid 80’s) • Rotating collapse of perfect fluid, relatively accurate determination of emitted gravitational wave-forms
Previous Work • Cornell Group (Shapiro,Teukolsky, Abrahams, Cook …) • Studied variety of problems in late 80’s through early 90’s using non-interacting particles as matter source • FOUND EVIDENCE FOR NAKED SINGULARITY FORMATION IN SUFFICIENTLY PROLATE COLLAPSE
Previous Work • Evans, (84-), Abrahams and Evans (-93) • Began as code for general relativistic hydrodynamics • Later specialized to vacuum collapse (Brill waves) • STUDIED CRITICAL COLLAPSE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES; FOUND EVIDENCE FOR SCALING & UNIVERSALITY (93)
Problems With Axisymmetry • Most codes used polar/spherical coordinates • Severe difficulties with regularity at coordinate singularities: , but especially -axis • Long-time evolutions difficult due to resulting instabilities • MAJOR MOTIVATION FOR SUSPENSION OF 2D STUDIES IN MID-90’s
Formalism • Adopt a (2+1)+1 decomposition; dimensional reduction --- divide out the action of the Killing vector (Geroch) • Gravitational degrees of freedom in 2+1 space • Scalar: • Twist vector: (ONE dynamical degree of freedom)
Formalism • Have not incorporated rotation yet (no twist vector); in this case easy to relate (2+1)+1 equations to “usual” 3+1 form • Adopt cylindrical coordinates • No dependence of any quantities on
Geometry • all functions of
Geometry • Coordinate conditions • Diagonal 2-metric • Maximal slicing • Kinematical variables: • Dynamical variables: Conjugate to
Matter • Single minimally coupled massless scalar field, • Also introduce conjugate variable
Evolution Scheme • Evolution equations for • “Constraint” equations for • Also have evolution equation for which is used at times • Compute and monitor ADM mass
Regularity Conditions • As , all functions either go as or • Regularity EXPLICITLY enforced
Boundary Conditions • Numerical domain is FINITE • Impose naïve outgoing radiation conditions on evolved variables, • Conditions based on asymptotic flatness and leading order behaviour used for “constrained” variables
Initial Data • Freely specify evolved quantities • Solve “constraints” for
Numerical Approach • Use uniform grid in • Grid includes • Use finite-difference formulae (mostly centred difference approximations)
Numerical Approach • Use “iterative Crank-Nicholson” to update evolved variables • Use multi-grid to solve coupled elliptic equations for , based on point-wise simultaneous relaxation of all four variables • Still have some problems with multi-grid in strong Brill collapse; using evolution equation for helps
Dissipation • Add explicit dissipation of “Kreiss-Oliger” form to differenced evolution equations • Scheme remains (second order), but high-frequency components are effectively damped • CRUCIAL for controlling instabilities, particularly along -axis
Kreiss-Oliger Dissipation: Example • Consider the simple “advection” equation • Finite difference via and
Kreiss-Oliger Dissipation: Example • Add “Kreiss-Oliger” dissipation via • Where and
Black Hole Excision • To avoid singularity within black hole, exclude interior of hole from computational domain (Unruh) • Operationally, track some surface(s) interior to apparent horizon(s) • Currently fix excision surface by scanning level contours of a priori specified function and choosing surface on which outgoing divergence of null rays is sufficiently negative