1 / 15

PRSp Alignment

PRSp Alignment. Finnish Aid in a PRS Context Helsinki Workshop 19-22 May 2003. Alignment – why worry?. PRSps have entered a new phase – from design to implementation Implementation requires consistent & coherent external support behind PRSP priorities (targets) & country capacity to deliver

jbeauregard
Télécharger la présentation

PRSp Alignment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PRSp Alignment Finnish Aid in a PRS Context Helsinki Workshop 19-22 May 2003

  2. Alignment – why worry? • PRSps have entered a new phase – from design to implementation • Implementation requires consistent & coherent external support behind PRSP priorities (targets) & country capacity to deliver • Non-aligned donor strategies risk countries devoting scarce resources to managing donors rather than meeting targets!

  3. Alignment – what is it? • For external partners - the extent to which all aid instruments & modalities are congruent with the discipline & cycle of the national PRS, MTEF & budget. • For partner governments - the extent to which the MTEF & the budget are subject to the national PRS (& vice versa?).

  4. More definitions • IMF (2003) distinguishes between: • Temporal Alignment of country’s own processes with PRS & national budget cycle or donor processes with country’s processes e.g. aligning timing & phases of donor programmes with the budget/PRS cycle. • Policy Alignment, where policies supported by donor programmes are derived directly from PRS.

  5. Harmonisation & streamlining • Related concepts • Harmonisation refers to the extent to which there is a commonality in donor policies, procedures & practices • Streamlining refers to the need to simplify, coordinate & reduce the number of procedures, indicators, missions, analytical reports etc.

  6. Aligning with the PRSp (1) • Extent of alignment will vary with country contexts & ‘strength’ of the PRSp & PRS process • Alignment at the country level includes drawing on or complementing the PRSp in all stages of the PRS cycle • Optimally, the principal content of external partner strategies is derived directly from the PRSp (goals, targets, priorities etc)

  7. Aligning with the PRSp (2) • Where an assistance prog. is not derived directly from the PRSp it may complement it, e.g. by addressing areas of weakness, updating analyses, feeding in lessons • Optimally, assistance programmes are implemented through existing partner Govt. institutions (disbursement, procurement, performance monitoring & review)

  8. Aligning with the PRSp (3) • External partner schedules are aligned with Govt. budget, MTEF and planning cycles • Assistance programmes are coordinated & harmonised with other donors to promote selectivity, comparative advantage&reduce transactions costs.

  9. Phases of PRSp Alignment Financing on-budget; in line with budget/MTEF cycle; conditions & benchmarks streamlined with PRSP matrix Country strategies linked to PRSP goals targets & macro framework Financing Policy formulation PRSP process: Results oriented, evidence based policy making? Shared analytical work; TA identified by Govt Poverty analysis Commun- ication Consultative & transparent processes M&E Policy impln Projects/programmes/ budget support complement PRSP; implementation managed by govt agencies Monitoring, review & audit drawing on govt. systems; annual PRSP review

  10. Country Experience • Ethiopia – complex environment, many external agencies • Following end of war much re-engagement based on a relatively successful PRSp process – extensive participation • Pool of capable GoE officials; Govt. leadership in preparation of PRSP (SDPRP) clear.

  11. Ethiopia • SDPRP starting point for common donor action; draws on sector progs. in health, educ, water, roads. • DAG Core Group/donors agreed rules of engagement for support of SDPRP process, including a Joint Donor Fund. • Commitment of most donors to build strategies on SDPRP

  12. Ethiopia • Progress on a common framework for budget support based on common matrix for performance assessment derived from SDPRP & alignment with annual PRSP review & budget cycle • Share of GBS likely to rise to 30% • SPA a key player

  13. Ethiopia • Harmonisation Task Force – adopted menu approach seeking to harmonise across all 3 main aid modalities: projects, programmes & GBS • Politically sensitive • Harmonisation of project aid the hardest to achieve; much assistance to SWAPs still projectised

  14. Alignment risks & challenges • All the donors ‘eggs in one basket’! What do Govts. do when things go wrong? • Macro-frameworks & MTEF ceilings – can all aid be ‘on-budget’? • Disconnects between donor HQs and country level • Lack of alignment across/within Government

  15. Alignment risks & challenges • Dangers of over-centralisation? i.e. heavy focus on aligning with national institutions/processes. • What’s the ‘right’ level of participation? The need to manage expectations & support a robust political process, particularly around the budget.

More Related