1 / 12

INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW – AN OVERVIEW

INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW – AN OVERVIEW. Dr.M.K.RAMESH, PROFESSOR, NLSIU, BANGALORE mkramesh13@gmail.com. I LEGAL FRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENT. THE SETTING : ONE, THE ANTI THESIS OF THE OTHER-

jbrennan
Télécharger la présentation

INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW – AN OVERVIEW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW –AN OVERVIEW Dr.M.K.RAMESH, PROFESSOR, NLSIU, BANGALORE mkramesh13@gmail.com

  2. I LEGAL FRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENT • THE SETTING : • ONE, THE ANTI THESIS OF THE OTHER- • ENVIRONMENT : RESOURCE , LIFE SUPPORT- CONSERVATION • DEVELOPMENT: RESOURCE USE, EXHAUTION- DEPLETION & LOSS • NOTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT “DEVELOPMENT THAT MEETS THE NEEDS OF THE PRESENT WITHOUT COMPROMISING THE ABILITY OF THE FUTURE GENERATIONS TO MEET THEIR OWN NEEDS” • CONSTITUTIONAL COMMANDS • RESPONSES OF THE LEGAL ORDER

  3. II INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL SCHEME • PRESENTS A MODEL THAT ACCOMMODATES ALL THE POSITIVE ASPECTS OF SD AND MORE- DEMOCRATIC IN LETTER AND SPIRIT – COMBINATION OF AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN THE WHOLE SYSTEM OF GOVERNANCE : • EQUITY – DPSP: Art.39 (b) and (c) 2. STATE RESPONSIBILITY AND INDIVIDUAL DUTY- ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: Arts. 48A & 51A(g) 3.PARTICIPATORY AND DECENTRALIZED RESOURCE MMT. REGIME: Communitarian Mmt.:Schedules V & VI; Third Tier of Governance: 73rd and 74th Amendments

  4. -Most of the Constitutional Developments and judicial interpretations, that have put Environmental Conservation and Stewardship at the hub of resource governance, are apost-1970 phenomena - more of an after thought , not having figured in at the time of the making of the Constitution

  5. III POLICY PERCEPTIONS ENVTL. POLICY THRUST TILL EARLY 1990s’: • ACCOMMODATIVE OF CONSTITUTIONAL ESSENCE AND INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES- “CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AS TWO WHEELS OF THE CHARIOT” • NATIONAL ENVTL. ACTION PLAN FOR CONTROL OF POLLUTION, 1992 • NATIONAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY, 1992 # POLICY THRUST FROM LATE 1990s’: ATTEMPTS TO INTEGRATE CONSERVATION,EFFICIENT MMT. OF RESOURCES, ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE AS TANTAMOUNTING TO SD # ECONOMIC POLICY & PLANS- STEERING NATURAL RESOURCE MMT. POLICIES & LAWS • NEP,2006 – COMBINATION OF SUBLIME & THE RIDICULOUS!

  6. ELEVENTH NATL. PLAN – SETS HIGH GROWTH TARGETS AND AT THE SAME TIME INSISTS ON ENDEAVORING “ TO PROVIDE ACESS TO BASIC FACILITIES SUCH AS HEALTH, EDN., CLEAN DRINKING WATER ETC., TO LARGE SECTIONS OF POPULATION WHICH DO NOT HAVE SUCH ACCESS AT PRESENT”- IDENTIFIES PROTECTION OF ENVT. AS ONE OF THE SEVEN MAJOR CHALLENGES – OFFERS MARKET MECHANISMS FOR BETTER ENVTL. MMT.- A LITTLE VAGUE AND, AT TIMES, INCONSISTENT AS TO ENVTL. MMT. (-” Rapid economic growth can intensify envtl. Degradation “ , “ The solution does not lie in slowing growth since slow growth also leads to its own form of envtl. Degradation : , “ With rapid growth we can also have the resources to prevent and deal with envtl. Problems, but we must also ensure that the rapid growth is also envtlly. Benign”) - THE PLAN AND THE POLICY GIVE A CALL FOR DILUTION OF THE EXISTING PROCEDURES OF ENVTL. CLEARANCES IN ORDER TO FACILITATE LARGE INVESTMENTS IN ORDER TO ACCELERATE GROWTH - HAVE CAST A DENSE SHADOW ON BOTH ENVTL. POLICIES AND LAW

  7. IV ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND ADMINISTRATION • GENERAL LAW & ADMINISTRATION : COMMON LAW & CRIMINAL LAW – LAW OF NUISANCE NEGLIGENCE & LIABILITY. • NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT LAWS : LAND REVENUE, LAND ACQUISITION, LAND REFORMS ; IRRIGATION,FISHERIES ; MINES & MINERALS ; FOREST, WILDLIFE , BIODIVERSITY ,PLANT VARIETIES, GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS • OVERARCHING LAW : ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ACT, RULES, NOTIFICATIONS AND AUTHORITIES • POLLUTION CONTROL LAWS : WATER AND AIR POLLUTION • ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE : TRIBUNALS, APPELLATE AUTHORITY, GREEN TRIBUNAL ACT,2010 • DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE: PANCHAYATS, CORPORATIONS, MUNICIPALITIES, TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING • HEALTH, SANITATION,HYGIENE, SAFETY : FACTORIES, INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, HEALTH CARE SERVICES ,FOOD ADULTRATION, PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS, CONSUMER INTEREST ETC.

  8. V JUDICIAL GLOSS • RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT PART OF Art.21 - • P.U.B.L.I.C. v.State of WB (1993): ‘ Demands of development can not dominate environmental interests’ • State of HP v.Ganesh Wood Products (1995) :- striking down of state approvals for production of forest-based products that posed envtl. Threats • Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. UOI (1996): SD as a viable concept to eradicate poverty and improve quality of life while living with in the carrying capacity of supporting ecosystems • Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v.UOI (1996): Application of SD as the basis for calculation of damages for envtl. Wrongs • N.D.Dayal v.UOI (2003):SD as sine qua non for the symbiotic balance between the rts. Of envt. And development • PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE-M.C.Mehta v. UOI (1996) • PRINCIPLE OF PRECAUTION – “ Scientific uncertainty, no excuse” _- (Vellore)

  9. VI EVALUATION • HIGHLY CENTRALISED AND BUREAUCRATIZED- ( -STATE AS THE LAW MAKER, ENFORCER, JUSTICE DISPENSER) • CENTRE AND STATE GOVTS. LAY DOWN POLICIES AND MAKE LAWS (- LSG- “ ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS” )-LEGISLATIONS NOT IN DYNAMIC FERMENT (- Even those, that seem like breaking away from the past stereo types, hardly get implemented- Biodiversity and Forest Rights etc.) • PRIMARILY A COMMAND AND CONTROL REGIME(- SALIENT FEATURE OF ALL POLLUTION CONTROL AND NATURAL RESOURCE MMT. LAWS)- EPA, NO LONGER AN OVERARCHING, ALL ENCOMPASSING , UMBRELLA LAW (-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPERATIVES NEITHER INFORM NOR INFLUENCE) • LEGAL PRESCRIPTIONS SEEN MORE AS HURDLES FOR DEVELOPMENT- AMENDED, OFTEN, TO DILUTE THEM (- EIA, CRZ)- ENVTL. CONSERVATION, A CASUALTY

  10. SECTORAL APPROACH- VERY LITTLE HARMONY IN FUNCTIONING AMONG MINISTRIES AND LINE AGENCIES IN EVOLVING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND FUNCTIONING. • THE LEGAL ORDER PRESENTS A DISCONCERTING PICTURE , OF A SYSTEM THAT EXCLUDES (-BOTH IN TERMS OF RESOURCES AND THE ACTORS , WHO DO MATTER A LOT FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT) AND FRAGMENTS DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENT THAN THE ONE THAT WOULD HELP, ENABLE AND EMPOWER AS TO MAKE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION , A RIGHT, DUTY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF EVERYONE • INDIAN MODEL OF GOVERNANCE IS, PERHAPS , JUST THE MICROCOSM OF WHAT THE CLOBAL LEGAL ORDER IS!!!

  11. References: Shyam Divan & Armin Rosencranz, Environmental law & Policy in India, (2nd.Ed.) OUP,New Delhi,2001

More Related