1 / 39

CAP Implementation in Mexico: Enhancing Early Warning Systems

Learn about Mexico's Earthquake Early Warning System, which utilizes the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) to provide timely and understandable warnings to the public. Discover how CAP is being used to improve disaster risk management in Iztapalapa County.

jcaffrey
Télécharger la présentation

CAP Implementation in Mexico: Enhancing Early Warning Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAP Implementation in MéxicoMtro. Mario Álvaro Ruiz VelázquezAsesor del Centro de Instrumentación y Registro Sísmico A. C. “CIRES”August 2016

  2. Background

  3. Background Mexico´s Earthquake Early Warning System https://www.dropbox.com/s/e7wujyjme7x8e0y/Multimedia1.mp4 https://www.dropbox.com/s/fg9iv2jb1grw8vk/Multimedia2.mp4 • México City 2014 • 1 minute warning • Los Angeles CA 2014 • Any Warning

  4. Background • Since 1991 is working Monitoring and Warning System to public directly, using technology designed by CIRES • Today with 98 acelerometers, in 7 States, 8 Transmitters (NOAA frequencies), EQW is acceded by 25 million people, using, since 2008 open standards: Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) and Emergency Alert System/Specific Area Message Encoding (EAS/SAME) • We use the CAP for Message Type for UPDATE, NOT Alert. ¿Why?

  5. Background Seismic

  6. How does it works? Emergency Diffusion Alerts Subsystem (EAS-SAME) and Update with CAP Communications, registering and control Subsystem (EASAS) Warns in VHF NOAA frequencies UHF frequencies State Seismic monitoring : Jalisco, Colima, Michoacán, Guerrero, Oaxaca and Puebla

  7. CAP is using Emergency Alert System /Specific Area Message Encoding (EAS/SAME)

  8. Background: Presidential Instruction Create and operate the National Warning System, which will provide information in real time to increase the security of Mexicans in situations of imminent danger (May 2013).

  9. Background: Earthquakes

  10. Background: Hidrometeorological

  11. Background: Volcano

  12. Background

  13. Background

  14. Actual Situation: Mexico use CAP • Creates CAP group for Mexico: IFT, CONAGUA-SMN, CIRES, others • IFT will be leading to continue sponsoring the use of CAP in Mexico.

  15. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR secretariat): Early Warning Systems Must to be created people-centered; also warnings must to be timely and understandable to those exposed to the risks, taking in care demographic, gender, culture and way of life of public, giving directions on the how to act in case of an alert and contributing to the effectiveness of the interventions of the disaster managers and other authorities. http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/364/1845/2167.short http://www.rural21.com/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/ELR_Early_warning_systems...0107.pdf

  16. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR secretariat): Early Warning Systems

  17. Federal Telecommunications Institute: National actions to use CAP in Mexico

  18. CAP Forum Mexico

  19. CAP Forum Mexico: Speakers

  20. CAP Forum Mexico: Discussion Panels Broadcasting Industry: "Experiences and challenges of the broadcasting industry in transmitting emergency messages" Telecommunications Industry: "Social responsibility of mobile telephony in disaster situations" Social Networks: "Information sharing disaster” CAP Development: "Future and new opportunities for the use of the CAP"

  21. CAP Forum Mexico: Participants Approx 95 % NationalWarningInstitutions Colegio Mexicano de Profesionales en Gestión de Riesgos y Protección Civil A.C. • Delegación Tlalpan • Delegación Iztapalapa • Delegación Iztacalco • Delegación Xochimilco • Delegación Milpa Alta • Delegación Venustiano Carranza • Municipio de Tlalnepantla • Municipio Naucalpan • Municipio Chimalhuacan • Municipio Cuautitlán Izcalli • (20 Million People aprox)

  22. Actual Situation: Legal framework August 2016: Deploy technical regulations to be observed by telecommunications licensees, broadcasters and service providers to prioritize communications applications and services providing transmission and reception of relevant information, newsletters or mass messages, it occurred before or after an emergency or risk free for users.

  23. Iztapalapa County: Use of CAP for all hazards; hidro meteorological warnings

  24. Background • Iztapalapa County has 1.8 million habitants. • Mainly Risks: Fails, earthquakes, volcano, land slides, floods, industry. • It doesn’t have a warning system. • The emergency response is disorganized and slow. • In each event the procedures for responding the emergency were reinvented. • It is necessary to move from the crisis in the response to crisis management. • Exist a wide gap to communicate to public in risk from authorities.

  25. ¿How does it work? Public MultipleEarlyWarningSystem MonitoringSources Alerta County Authorities Medios de comunicación Estratégico Estatus: Táctico INFORMACION DE CAMPO Alerta Operativo Base Plata

  26. Methodological and concept framework Gestión de riesgo de desastre

  27. Development alert thresholds for Iztapalapa Nota: Para emitir las alertas es preciso que se presenten al menos dos de los cinco parámetros establecidos.

  28. Detail Protocol

  29. Iztapalapa´sPlan

  30. Comprehensive information for public

  31. Priority for action included in the Hyogo framework for action 2000-2015 “Identify, assess and monitor disaster risk and enhance early warning” Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. “Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard early warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to people by 2030.” Status = 3.2

  32. Priority for action included in the Hyogo framework for action 2000-2015 “Identify, assess and monitor disaster risk and enhance early warning” Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. “Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard early warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to people by 2030.” Status = 8.4 (3 months)

  33. Comparison of floods in September 2013 and June 2016

  34. Testimonies of thepopulation • “I received the alert and park my car on the streets where usually does not get flooded”. (Vicente Guerrero Neighbor) • “I got time to raise my valuable belongings so they do not get wet”. (U.H. ISSSTE) • “I live alone , and with the alert system I feel safer. At least it gives me time to leave my house and got to a safe area”. (Older woman) • “Finally the government is doing something to help us with the problem of flooding, nobody warned us before, and now the pumps are switched on time”. (U.H. DesarrolloUrbanoQutzalcoátl) • “We passed from the population complaint to the collaboration and shared responsibility. Through dialogue and the implementation of this kind of action we prevent avoidable suffering”(Luis Eduardo Pérez Cancino, Civil Protection Director of Iztapalapa County)

  35. With the power of people we are prepare for floods; ¡we go for more warnings! Dione Anguiano, Iztapalapa Mayor

  36. Conference of CAP

  37. Conclusions • Alerts before events, also is linked directly to recovery actions (coordinate various areas effort). • Improvement of recovery time and coordination of emergency response. • Fees are of official sources. • It is expandable to other phenomena and to different media because it is based on CAP. • Improves resilience of the population.

  38. Resume • Mexico´s Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT) is leading and working to finish legal framework to use CAP in Mexico • IFT is working with Presidency Office of México, with warning authorities to use CAP. • Iztapalapa County is the first local authority that use CAP to alert directly to Public. • Mexico´s EQW is still using CAP to Update Earthquakes information; for Alert is using EAS/SAME VHF technology (fast response) • CAP-EAS/SAME protocols may to be used for last mile to warn communities that doesn´t have access to other telecommunications medias

More Related