1 / 50

UHECRs: AGNs or Spiral galaxies?... or Ellipticals?

UHECRs: AGNs or Spiral galaxies?... or Ellipticals?. with Ghirlanda, Tavecchio, Fraternali, Pareschi MNRAS, 390, L88. 27 Auger Events >57 EeV. 1 EeV=10 18 eV. Auger events. The Auger collaboration, 2007, Science. If the Galactic plane is excluded, 19 out of 21 events do correlate. Virgo.

jeb
Télécharger la présentation

UHECRs: AGNs or Spiral galaxies?... or Ellipticals?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UHECRs: AGNs or Spiral galaxies?... or Ellipticals? with Ghirlanda, Tavecchio, Fraternali, Pareschi MNRAS, 390, L88

  2. 27 Auger Events >57 EeV 1 EeV=1018 eV Auger events The Auger collaboration, 2007, Science

  3. If the Galactic plane is excluded, 19 out of 21 events do correlate Virgo AGNs from VC-V catalogue CenA Auger events The Auger collaboration, 2007, Science

  4. George, Fabian, Baumgartner, Mushotzky,Teueller 2008: Swift/BAT AGNs AGNs Supergalactic coordinates UHECRs

  5. 98% weighted by flux 84% not weighted by flux 138 AGNs; 19 UHECRs with |b|<15o, d <25o 57 AGNs within 100 Mpc GZK effect

  6. HIPASS: ~5000 HI emitting galaxies (21 cm) Weight for flux and Auger exposure GG+, 2008

  7. Completeness limit ~72%

  8. Cut in distance

  9. Cut in luminosity

  10. Virgo Centaurus

  11. It is not Cen A, it is the Centaurus cluster (>40 Mpc)

  12. 100 Mpc

  13. Can we discriminate between AGN and spirals?

  14. 2777 HI-galaxies (North+South 95% completeness)

  15. Swift 22 months = 242 AGN with z 2777 HI-galaxies (North+South 95% completeness)

  16. Swift 22 months = 242 AGN 93 AGN (dec<25; |b|<15: D < 164 Mpc) 2134 HI-galaxies (dec<25; |b|<15; D < 164 Mpc; 95% completeness) Pw=95.2%

  17. 2pt cross correlation function 2.6s 93 AGN (dec<25; |b|<15: D < 164 Mpc) 2134 HI-galaxies(dec<25; |b|<15; D < 164 Mpc; 95% completeness)

  18. AGN D n1/2 HI Gal N (extracted from HI galaxies) n=n1*n2/(n1+n2)

  19. What about Ellipticals? • If what is important is the local distribution of matter, then also ellipticals should correlate. Will they correlate better than spirals?

  20. 14677 IRAS Galaxies with z 4281: all types with dec<25;|b|<10 D<100 Mpc Pn=46.6% Pw=53.5% Preliminary!

  21. Ellipticals IRAS 549E0-S0 dec<25; |b|<10 d<100 Mpc Pn=58.2% Pw=99.4% Preliminary!

  22. Progenitors • AGNs • Spirals • Ellipticals

  23. Progenitors FAuger ~ 10-11 erg cm2 s-1Flux for E>57 EeV • Easy for AGNs (but they are radio-quiet… no g) In Spirals we can have GRBs and Magnetars, both should be related to the number of massive stars.

  24. Integrated HI flux Apparent magnitude

  25. Progenitors FAuger ~ 10-11 erg cm2 s-1Flux for E>57 EeV • Easy for AGNs (but they are radio-quiet… no g) • Short `BATSE’ GRBs: 150 yr-1; <Fluence>~10-7; 1/10 nearby  flux not enough (if Fem = FCR)

  26. Progenitors FAuger ~ 10-11 erg cm2 s-1Flux for E>57 EeV • Easy for AGNs (but they are radio-quiet… no g) • Short `BATSE’ GRBs: 150 yr-1; <Fluence>~10-7; 1/10 nearby  flux not enough (if Fem = FCR) • Long `BATSE’ GRBs: 450 yr-1; <Fluence>~10-6; very few nearby  (too distant)

  27. Progenitors FAuger ~ 10-11 erg cm2 s-1Flux for E>57 EeV • Easy for AGNs (but they are radio-quiet… no g) • Short `BATSE’ GRBs: 150 yr-1; <Fluence>~10-7; 1/10 nearby  flux not enough (if Fem = FCR) • Long `BATSE’ GRBs: 450 yr-1; <Fluence>~10-6; very few nearby  (too distant) • Giant Flares of Magnetars (flux not enough)

  28. Progenitors FAuger ~ 10-11 erg cm2 s-1Flux for E>57 EeV • Easy for AGNs (but they are radio-quiet… no g) • Short `BATSE’ GRBs: 150 yr-1; <Fluence>~10-7; 1/10 nearby  flux not enough (if Fem = FCR) • Long `BATSE’ GRBs: 450 yr-1; <Fluence>~10-6; very few nearby  (too distant) • Giant Flares of Magnetars (flux not enough) • Newly born, fastly spinning Magnetars (!!!, but went unobserved by BATSE)

  29. GRB 060218 ??? BAT [15-150 keV] F [erg/cm2/s] Toma et al. 2006 Epeak

  30. GRB 060218 ??? Campana et al. 2006 Opt-UV

  31. GRB 060218 ??? • Very long, soft, underluminous, nearby (145 Mpc) • It could not have triggered BATSE • Proposed to be a newborn magnetar (Soderberg+ 2007; Toma+ 2007) • Right rate

  32. 4p<R2> FAuger L ~ ~ 1040-1042 erg/s N Progenitors: Ellipticals 2002, ApJ, 571, 226

  33. Conclusions - I • UHECRs correlate with spirals • newly born magnetars? • ECR ~ 1050 erg. Rate: 1 every 104 years per galaxy • New class of GRBs (2 per yr all sky): similar to GRB 060218: soft, very long, underluminous+SN

  34. Conclusions - II • UHECRs correlate with ellipticals • Unconspicuos jets? • Very low power jets, small density, unscreened E-field • NOT CenA: its jet is powerful (~1045 erg/s), we see less because it is misaligned

  35. GRBs estimates assuming FUHECRs=Fg Short GRBs: 490 BATSE in 9 years Tot fluence = 5.5e-4 cgs. If a fraction 10% is nearby: <F>=3.9e-13 cgs (assumes BATSE saw half of the sky) Long GRBs: 1490 BATSE in 9 years Tot fluence = 0.024 cgs. <F>=1.7e-10 cgs. They can if 10% is very nearby (but it is not).

  36. Swift 22 months = 242 AGN 93 AGN (dec<25; |b|<15: D < 164 Mpc)

  37. Pn = Prob with number; Pw = Prob weighted for galaxies’ flux Different numbers of galaxies correspond to different cuts: |b|<10° and δ<24.8° when considering CR (for IRAS completeness and PAO FOV; |b|<15° and z<0.5 when considering AGN (for AGN completeness and IRAS extension in z, respectively)

  38. AGN D n1/2 Ellipt. Gal N (extracted from elliptical (<S0) galaxies) Extract N galaxies (<S0) and correlate with galaxies <S0 and AGN (note that 1.7 is the saturation value of AGN vs all IRAS galaxies)

More Related