1 / 3

Enhancing Citizen Impact: The Role of Supreme Audit Institutions

The PSC Steering Committee meeting held on May 30-31, 2012, focused on ISSAI 2, which articulates the value and benefits of Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs). Key inquiries included the suitability of ISSAI 2 for various SAI models, the effectiveness of the three primary headings in reflecting SAI contributions to citizen welfare, and the appropriateness of its twelve principles. Participants provided feedback crucial for refining the document to ensure its alignment with the intended impacts on citizens’ lives and its potential inclusion in the ISSAI framework.

jemma
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Citizen Impact: The Role of Supreme Audit Institutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Value and Benefits of Supreme Audit Institutions – making a difference to the lives of citizens PSC Steering Committee meeting 30 – 31 May 2012

  2. The draft ISSAI 2:The Value and Benefits of Supreme Audit Institutions – making a difference to the lives of citizens Interrelated Objective 1 Objective 2

  3. Feedback required from PSC Steering Committee • Is ISSAI 2 suitable for all the different types of SAIs, including the court model? • Do the three broad headings within ISSAI 2 capture the key ways in which SAIs can make a difference to the lives of their citizens? • Are the twelve principles within ISSAI 2 appropriately worded, and are they correctly positioned in the document relative to the three broad headings noted above? • Are there other principles which should be included? • Is ISSAI 2 likely to be suitable for inclusion at level 1 of the ISSAI framework? • Any other feedback on the draft ISSAI 2?

More Related