300 likes | 384 Vues
Current Results of the Investigation of Thin Current Sheets and Reconnection by Simulation and CLUSTER Observations. J. Büchner Max-Planck Institut für Aeronomie, Lindau in collaboration with the CLUSTER data teams: RAPID (P. Daly, U. Mall, B. Nikutowski; MPAe)
E N D
Current Results of the Investigation of Thin Current Sheets and Reconnection by Simulation and CLUSTER Observations J. Büchner Max-Planck Institut für Aeronomie, Lindau in collaboration with the CLUSTER data teams: RAPID (P. Daly, U. Mall, B. Nikutowski; MPAe) FGM (K.-H. Glaßmeier, K.-H. Fornacon; TUB) CIS (H. Reme; TOULOUSE and A. Korth; MPAe) J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Outline Space Weather Relevance of current sheets and reconnection Necessity of kinetic approach Kinetic simulation results: from 2 to 3D CLUSTER observations J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Reconnection – explained at Sun 1.) Ideal plasmas (ideally conducting): • magnetic flux frozen-in • magnetic connectivity conserved (A-B) 2.) Reconnection: • due to local non-ideality: • change of magnetic connectivity (C) J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Current Sheets and Reconnection in Space Weather, Observed by Spacecraft J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Current Sheet Particle Motion J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Harris-type Current Sheet Model J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
2D Kinetic Reconnection: Differential Ion / Electron Flows Electron outflow c/pe wide Ion outflow c/pi i wide J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
2D Kinetic Reconnection: Hall currents cause quadrupolar By Current j due to differential e/i flows Quadrupolar magnetic field By J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
2D Simulation Results (GEM 2001) (from:Birn et al: GEM effort 2001) • all these approaches break the frozen-in condition differently but yield identical reconnection rates • MHD reconnection is too slow by orders of magnitude, it is not adequate for collisionless magnetic reconnection J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Wind s/c Observation in the Geotail Oeierset, et al., 2001 J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
2.5 D Reconnection: Magnetopause 210 degrees: 2.5 D 125 degrees: 2.5 D 180 degrees: 2D Different shear angles between Magnetosphere and Magnetosheath -> (J = direction of the sheet current and of the reconnection electric field) J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
From 2D to „2.5D“ (Finite Byo) Quadrupolar By field Core field Byo -> flux ropes -> Bending of B-fields J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Third Dimension: Variations in the Current Direction Enabled: ->LHD, Kink- and Sausage Instabilities J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
3D Current Sheet Instability Isodensity surfaces; (Büchner and Kuska, 1999) J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
3D: Sausage Mode Instability J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
3D Kink Mode Instability J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
3D Plasmoid Formation: (Büchner, 99) J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
The Cluster mission J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Simulated Current Sheet Crossing J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Cluster Orbit 7.9.01 18:00-24:00 J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Magnetic fields 7.9.01 19:00 – 23:00 J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Neutral sheet crossings 7.9.2001 19:00 – 23:00 UT J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Current sheet thickness C1<->C4(19:00~>23:00) J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
The Four Spacecraft at 21:00 J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Current sheet waves ~21:00 UT J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Consequence: Multiple Reconnection (21:30-22:08) J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
RAPID – C1 protons 28-69 keV 7.9.01 21:45-22:02 UT J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
RAPID – C3 protons 28-69 keV 7.9.01 21:46-22:03 UT J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
RAPID – C4 protons 28-69 keV 7.9.01 21:46-22:03 UT J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002
Summary Kinetic simulation revealed -> In a full 3D consideration thin current sheets (TCS) cause bulk waves triggering 3D reconnection CLUSTER multipoint measurements allowed -> first independent determination of CS thickness and motion Results: CS thinning (->TCS) leads to the predicted wave activity Extreme CS thinning is followed by reconnection J. Büchner WSEF Adelaide, July 25, 2002