1 / 25

Enhancing School Accountability and Performance in Michigan Education: 2007 Updates

This report from the Michigan Department of Education outlines key updates and components in school accountability systems, focusing on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act. It discusses legal requirements, accreditation, assessment standards, and the importance of student achievement indicators. Proposed improvements for the 2007-08 school year emphasize performance level changes, rubrics for reporting, and the significance of external data in evaluating school performance. Recommendations aim to refine the School Improvement Framework and enhance educational outcomes across Michigan's schools.

jennis
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing School Accountability and Performance in Michigan Education: 2007 Updates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Education YES! Update Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability October-November, 2007

  2. Accountability Components • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • No Child Left Behind Act • State Accreditation – Education YES! • Michigan Revised School Code

  3. Legal Requirements from Code • Annual Report • School Improvement Plan • Core Curriculum • Assessment of ELA/reading and mathematics grades 1-5 • High School Courses • NAEP Participation if Selected

  4. Education YES! • Developed in 2002 • Used since 2002-03 • Time to start looking at changes, revisions, and improvements • Student Achievement • Indicators

  5. Education YES! to date Achievement Change Achievement Status Indicators

  6. Education YES! Plan 2003 Achievement Change Achievement Status Achievement Growth Indicators

  7. Proposed for 2007-08 Achievement Status adjusted for Progress or Change Indicators

  8. Achievement Status • A score and grade for each subject counted at the school • Uses data for all subjects counted at the school • Includes assessments assigned by feeder code for grades 3-9 • Based on the best of most recent year, most recent two years, or most recent three years

  9. Performance Level Change Designations • Used to compare the achievement of the same students at adjacent grade levels • Same student from grade 3 to grade 4 • Improvement or decline within a performance level is recognized

  10. Performance Level Change Designations - MEAP

  11. Predicted Achievement • A prediction will be made for each content area and grade level that were tested in previous years and that are not used for Performance Level Change Designations • Science • Social Studies • High Schools

  12. Achievement for Accreditation

  13. Indicators to be Phased In • SIF Report • Rubrics or SAR for NCA schools • School Improvement Plan • External Data • Extra Credit

  14. MDE/NCA Partnership • Streamline Reporting • North Central Association (AdvancEd) • NCA Schools • Standards and Assessment Report to MDE in place of Rubrics Report • Other Schools • Update rubrics report on AdvancEd site

  15. Indicators of School Performance • Rubrics developed based on the School Improvement Framework • 90 rubrics were pilot tested in the spring of 2006 • 2006-07 reporting based on the new rubrics • 40 rubrics selected for reporting by all schools • All rubrics are available for school use

  16. School Improvement Framework Strands • Teaching for Learning • Leadership • Personnel and Professional Learning • School and Community Relations • Data and Information Management

  17. School Improvement Framework • 40 Evidence Bearing Indicators • All 5 Strands • Strand 1: 11 Indicators • Strand 2: 10 Indicators • Strand 3: 7 Indicators • Strand 4: 5 Indicators • Strand 5: 7 Indicators

  18. External Data • All Levels • Percent Highly Qualified Teachers • Student Attendance Rate • Parent Teacher Conference Attendance • Instructional Staff turnover rate • Percent of staff involved in Professional Development • Percent of new teachers mentored • Years of experience based on date of hire • Percent of teachers working under permit

  19. External Data • Elementary • District offers school readiness program • Middle Schools • Percent of students taking Algebra 1 • High Schools • Graduation and Dropout Rates • Advanced Placement and Dual Enrollment • Percent Participating • Percent Taking and Percent Passing AP exams

  20. Education YES! Plans 2007-08 • Credit for reporting self-rating, evidence or SAR for NCA schools • External Data • “Extra Credit”

  21. Possible “Extra Credit” • Additional Data Collection and Use • Surveys of parents, staff, students • Peer Review • Program Distinction • Limit on effect of “Extra Credit” for Grade and Score

  22. Unified AYP and Grade B A A B C D F B (iv) B Education YES! Composite Score C (iii) C D/Alert (ii) C Unaccredited (i) D/Alert (ii) No AYP Makes AYP (i) – (iv) – Priorities for Assistance

  23. Education YES Plans • 2006-07 is a Statewide Pilot • 2007-08 • Link self-rating and evidence to Action Plan • Additional External Data • “Extra Credit” • Student Progress related to Achievement Status

  24. Approval Steps • State Board – November • Public Hearings – December • State Board – February • Legislative Committees

  25. Contact Information Paul Bielawski Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Michigan Department of Education PO Box 30008 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335-5784 bielawskip@michigan.gov

More Related