1 / 10

Reading and writing critically for PhD

Reading and writing critically for PhD. Tracy Simmons BDRA Research Day. Thinking critical. What do we mean by c ritical….. Academia and academics as autonomous, ‘free agents’ to question, conduct research without interference.

jenski
Télécharger la présentation

Reading and writing critically for PhD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reading and writing critically for PhD Tracy Simmons BDRA Research Day

  2. Thinking critical • What do we mean by critical….. • Academia and academics as autonomous, ‘free agents’ to question, conduct research without interference. • Peer review systems based on critical feedback (anonymous), hierarchical system. • All academics no matter how special, important or great, face critical appraisal, peer review and feedback. • Research framed in terms of ‘rigor’.

  3. Reading critically • Critical skills are seen as an essential part of being a researcher, an academic. • But also as citizens the ability to be critical and apply critical analysis to information is seen as a key skill. • Reading: narrowing down established data related to your topic, models/paradigms, theoretical frameworks. • Context!

  4. Mind the gap… • Gaps….are there gaps, areas that are unexplored. • This can be the spur for your own critical engagement with the literature. • Theoretical limitations/gaps, empirical* or out of date models • Evidence • Don’t just dismiss- what can these insights however limited help you in terms of your own research design and conceptualisation? • Selective, what work helps advance your research?

  5. Reading • Evaluation of the ideas, range of research • What are the arguments* made • Key themes • Where are they coming from (disciplinary tradition/approach) • Position* • Geographical location, country specific focus*? • Interpretation of the material • Know your field.

  6. Reading into Writing • From description to analysis • Synthesis • Developing your own argument –finding a voice • Evidence-your own data • Theoretical framework • Methodological rigor, research design • Rational e.g. sample size

  7. Writing • Forms and modes to develop your own critical writing • Book reviews • Shorter dialogue pieces • Shorter position papers, discussion papers • Conference papers • Conference presentations • Working papers

  8. Final reflections • It is through testing your ideas and arguments you can further strengthen the critical strains of your work. • Supervisor, research communities, peers, conferences, seminars and workshops. • Keep reading. • The more you articulate your research the better it gets! • Editing, critical reflection, being reflexive. • It is not a linear process!

  9. What they say… • http://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/careers/ld/resources/writing/writing-resources/critical-reading • Tony-Wallace and Wray • http://www.uk.sagepub.com/books/Book226896 • Wellington J., Bathmaker A., Hunt C., McCulloch G. and Sikes P. (2005). Succeeding with your doctorate. London: Sage. • Oliver, P. (2008) Writing Your Thesis 2nd ed. London, Sage.

  10. I like: • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/23564/ • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/23564/1/Converging_traditions_of_research_on_media_and_information_literacies_(LSERO).pdf • This chapter provides an overview based on clusters of research around media literacy • Historical context • Themes • Gaps • There own argument and approach to media literacy.

More Related