1 / 15

Assessing the implications for close relatives in the event of similar but non-matching DNA profiles

Assessing the implications for close relatives in the event of similar but non-matching DNA profiles. Travis E. Doom, Mike L. Raymer and Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH. Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com). STR genotypes are very amenable to database searches.

jermaine
Télécharger la présentation

Assessing the implications for close relatives in the event of similar but non-matching DNA profiles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing the implications for close relatives in the event of similar but non-matching DNA profiles Travis E. Doom, Mike L. Raymer and Dan E. Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com)

  2. STR genotypes are very amenable to database searches • United States: 2.4 million entries (CODIS) • Great Britain: 2.1 million entries (National DNA Database) • Austalia: 18,000 entries (CrimTrac) • New Zealand: 16,000 entries • Others

  3. STR genotype comparison outcomes Kind of match Investigation? Perfect match “Cold hit.” Non-matching Eliminate as suspect.

  4. STR genotype comparison outcomes Kind of match Investigation Perfect match “Cold hit.” Non-matching Eliminate as suspect. Almost-matching Eliminate as suspect. Investigate relatives?

  5. Possible positions of the accused: Kind of match Explanation Perfect match “I didn’t do it, my brother did it.” Non-matching “I didn’t do it.” Almost-matching “I didn’t do it. Neither did any of my relatives.”

  6. A practical example of familial searching • In 2003, North Carolina’s SBI generates STR genotypes from evidence from a rape/murder in 1984. • STR results exonerate Darryl Hunt after 18 years in jail. • No perfect matches to the perpetrator’s STR profile are found with any of the 40,000 individuals in the NC convicted offender database. • One individual in the database, Anthony Dennard Brown, is found to match at 16 of 26 alleles.

  7. A practical example of familial searching • Is there probable cause to investigate Anthony Dennard Brown’s brother?

  8. A practical example of familial searching • Is there probable cause to investigate Anthony Dennard Brown’s brother? • “This is a real-time story. (It’s) something that we’re trying to get right, right now. Everybody wants to make use of the (DNA) databases’ incredible power. The question we’re all asking ourselves is: How do you strike the balance?” Angelo Della Manna, forensic biology chief of the Alabama state lab and an analyst in the Brown case. • “We believe in what we’re doing. If you want a debate, we say fine, bring it on.” Richard Pinchin, director of Britain’s Forensic Science Service familial searching program.

  9. Current US rules on familial searching • The FBI is barred from performing familial searches. • New York and Massachusetts have specific statutes that authorize familial searching of their state databases. • California’s DNA database technicians report partial matches but only if they “appear useful.” • Virginia analysts only tell investigators about “very, very close” matches. • Florida analysts can only report matches of 21 of 26 alleles or better -- “men who have 21 alleles in common are almost always brothers.”

  10. This slide intentionally left blank for Travis’ and Mike’s slides.

  11. A practical example of familial searching • Is there probable cause to investigate Anthony Dennard Brown’s brother?

  12. Likelihood ratios (LRs) for profiles with matching rare and common alleles

  13. A practical example of familial searching • Is there probable cause to investigate Anthony Dennard Brown’s brother? • Detectives collect cigarette butts from Willard Brown. • Willard’s STR genotype matches at all 26 alleles. He has pled guilty and is serving a life sentence (plus ten years). • “We’re having a positive effect on cases (and) preventing additional victims. What’s wrong there?” Richard Pinchin, director of Britain’s Forensic Science Service familial searching program.

  14. Should familial searches be done? • “We believe in what we’re doing. If you want a debate, we say fine, bring it on.” Richard Pinchin, director of Britain’s Forensic Science Service familial searching program. • “We can’t just open the floodgates and unleash this (without) rules to protect the freedoms and liberties of those who are potentially subject to intrusive searches. . . . (but) how could you not use (DNA)? It has tremendous potential as an investigative tool.” Frederick Bieber, Harvard University Medical School

  15. Should familial searches be done? • “The average Joe on the street, if he knew what could be done (with DNA databases), he would be worried about privacy. I think the average Joe is right.” George Li, Virginia convicted offender database manager.

More Related