1 / 21

ESBN Working Group on Land Degradation

ESBN Working Group on Land Degradation. Proposed by: Pandi Zdruli, Selim Kapur and Luca Montanarella. Is it feasible? Is it needed? Who should participate? What could be the outputs and deliverables? Who needs them? How to use them?. Land/soil degradation.

Télécharger la présentation

ESBN Working Group on Land Degradation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESBN Working Group on Land Degradation Proposed by: Pandi Zdruli, Selim Kapur and Luca Montanarella Is it feasible? Is it needed? Who should participate? What could be the outputs and deliverables? Who needs them? How to use them?

  2. Land/soil degradation • Inefficiency to maintain economic and ecological functions of land • Reduction capacity of the land to perform its functions and produce goods and services Natural processes (i.e. climate change, volcanoes, earthquakes) Human-induced processes Could mitigate (+) BUT could accelerate (-) effects on natural processes Land degradation Resource base: quantitative and qualitative changes • - Climate • Biosphere • Water • Soil • other Soil degradation Physical, chemical, and/or biological degradation of the SOIL  loss of its ability to fulfil its functions (productivity and environmental)

  3. Land degradation • Has received widespread debate at global level • Many definitions, often with distinctive disciplinary-oriented meaning • Few assessments, scattered data, some exclude important socio-economic considerations • Lack of monitoring systems

  4. Past assessments • Used different definitions of land degradation • Have been carried out with different methods - often considering only one aspect of land degradation (e.g. only soil degradation) • Often based on the risks of degradation rather than the actual state of the land • Use different scales and parameters to quantify the extent of degradation • Results are often not comparable

  5. Therefore we still don’t know… ? • What is the real magnitude/rate of land degradation (not only the risk of degradation)? • Where are the biggest problems: what do we need to manage, how, by whom, for how long? • How much does it cost to solve/prevent problems? • What are the benefits of acting or not? • How do we know if we are improving?

  6. Need for a new generation of Land Degradation assessments Need for assessments that: • Use harmonised definitions and methods • Consider biophysical and socio-economic aspects • Use several disciplines to address the complexity of land degradation • Address different scales • Allow for data comparability • Make best use of information already available

  7. What for? • Identify a baseline to: • Establish priorities based on cost-benefit analyses • Decide on best actions for conservation, rehabilitation/reclamation • Monitor success of new land management practices • Monitor success of actions from NAPs- Conventions

  8. What for? • Make use of funds in the best possible way • Explore the potential for resolving common problems at regional level • Stop the trend of assessing forever using different parameters…

  9. Some concepts of land degradation in the past FAO 1979:Land degradation is a process which lowers the current and/or potential capability of soils to produce Houghton and Charman 1986: Aspects of physical, chemical, and/or biological deterioration including loss of organic matter, decline in soil fertility, decline in structural condition, erosion, adverse changes in salinity, acidity or alkalinity, and the effects of toxic chemicals, pollutants or excessive flooding UNEP 1992: Land degradation implies reduction of resource potential by one or a combination of processes acting on land

  10. Some concepts of land degradation in the past • Some focused in single compartments (e.g. only soils) • Some considered a limited number of processes • Do not help to understand the complexity of land degradation, since they consider only biophysical aspects

  11. LADA definition, 2005 Definition adopted by the Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) project: Land degradation isthe reduction in the capacity of the land to perform ecosystem functions and services (including those of agro-ecosystems and urban systems) that support society and development

  12. land- ecosystem functions and services 2005 land 1992 soils 1979 Evolving concepts of land degradation (II)

  13. Land degradation (I) • Includes damage/change to one or more components: • Soil • Water bodies (surface, groundwater) • Vegetation cover • Fauna (micro/macrolevel)

  14. Land degradation (II) Through different processes (isolated or combined): • Physical: crusting, compaction, erosion, waterlogging, depletion of underground water, etc. • Chemical: acidification, leaching, salinisation, changes in cation exchange capacity, fertility depletion, pollution, etc. • Biological: reduction in total biomass carbon sequestration, changes in biodiversity (micro/macro), eutrophication…

  15. Land degradation (III) These processes are driven by different factors: • Inappropriate land use/land management • Natural disasters • Socio-economic: land tenure, market, population growth, institutional support, income, education, human health… • Political:incentives, political stability or instability…

  16. Aspects to consider • Land degradation: • is complex, includes physical, chemical, biological and socio-economic factors, therefore it needs a multidisciplinary approach • impacts on economic growth • concerns different stakeholders - from the farmer to the national/regional authorities • Recovering degraded land may be expensive/not feasible - early action is desirable • Early warning systems are necessary to avoid further losses

  17. ESBN Working Group on Land Degradation Is it feasible? Yes: ESBN has plenty of internal human resources Is it needed for Europe? Yes International Working Group on LD and Desertification of IUSS started as a Task Force in 1996 and converted to WG in World Congress of Soil Science in Montpellier in 1998 however The focus remain in developing countries But Land Degradation is a problem affecting both poor and rich countries including Europe (i.e. UNCCD Annex 4 European countries ) Who should participate? Scientists of different backgrounds What could be the outputs deliverables? Atlas of Land Degradation for Europe (????) But first we MUST agree on the methodology; Who needs them? A wide range of stakeholders from policy/decision makers (in Malta many of them do not consider LD a problem) down to the farming community How to use and disseminate them? All available forms of communication including media, conferences, etc

  18. European Soil Geographical Database 1:1M Land Degradation Atlas of Europe

  19. Main topics of the 5th ICLDvMultidisciplinary assessment of land degradation and desertification at local, national, regional and global scales;vInteraction between natural ecosystem components (land, water, biodiversity) and socio-economic indicators and their overall impact on land degradation;vImpacts of human mismanagement on natural resources and examples of best management practices in reducing land degradation effects;vPromotion of income-generating activities that alleviate poverty through enhancement of sustainable crop production systems and valorisation of indigenous knowledge in sustainable ecosystem management;vParticipatory management of natural resources as a mean to sustain both productivity and environmental sustainability; vEstablishing of the role and responsibilities of various stakeholders in reducing the negative effects of land degradation and enhancing soil conservation measures;vState and development of policy options, management strategies, and guidelines for sustainable natural resources use and management;vDevelopment of economically sustainable measures that match with environmental quality.

  20. Comments/suggestions are most welcome Send them to: Pandi@iamb.it kapur@mail.cu.edu.tr Luca.montanarella@jrc.it

  21. Thank You

More Related