1 / 25

G R O U P 7

G R O U P 7. Under the Supervision of: Mr. KHAIRUL HAZDI BIN YUSOF. The study of relationship between Adversity Quotient (AQ) And Academic Performance (GPA) among year 1 to year 3 Biomedical Sciences undergraduates.

jesse
Télécharger la présentation

G R O U P 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GROUP 7 Under the Supervision of: Mr. KHAIRUL HAZDI BIN YUSOF

  2. The study of relationship between Adversity Quotient (AQ) And Academic Performance (GPA) among year 1 to year 3 Biomedical Sciences undergraduates.

  3. INTRODUCTIONAdversity Quotient (AQ), is the science of human resilience. Resilience is the ability to adapt well to stress, adversity, trauma or tragedy. (Dr. Stoltz, 2000)

  4. RESEARCH QUESTIONIs there any relationshipbetweenAdversity Quotient (AQ)andAcademic Performance (GPA) among year 1 to year 3Biomedical Science undergraduates?

  5. There is a significant relationshipbetweenAdversity Quotient (AQ)andAcademic Performance (GPA) among year 1 to year 3 Biomedical Science undergraduates. HYPOTHESIS

  6. GENERAL OBJECTIVE To studythe relationship between Adversity Quotient (AQ)andAcademic Performance (GPA)of the Biomedical Sciences undergraduates.

  7. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES

  8. METHODOLOGY STUDY DESIGN : Cross-sectional Study TARGET POPULATION : Biomedical science undergraduates of UKM KL campus, 2010/2011 Academic session. STUDY POPULATION : 1ST, 2ND, & 3RD year Biomedical science undergraduates of UKM KL campus, 2010/2011 Academic session.

  9. SAMPLING METHOD : Stratified sampling method SAMPLING FRAME : The list of the 1ST, 2ND, & 3RD year Biomedical science undergraduates. SAMPLE UNIT : 1ST, 2ND, & 3RD year Biomedical science undergraduates.

  10. SAMPLE SIZE : In this study, the sample size is 159 respondents. According to Krejcie R.V. & Morgan D.W. (1970) : Χ2 NP (1-P) Sample Size, n = ∆2 (N-1) + Χ2P (1-P) Where : d.f. = 1, α = 0.05, Χ2 = 3.84 Degree of accuracy, ∆ = 0.05 Population proportion, P = 0.5 (assumed value) N = Population size * Sampling Error used in this study is 10%.

  11. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Biomedical science undergraduates YEAR OF STUDY GENDER • ADVERSITY QUOTIENT • Control • Origin & Ownership • Reach • Endurance ? ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE (GPA)

  12. INCLUSION CRITERIA 1. Year 1, Year 2 and Year 3 undergraduates that study Biomedical Science in the 2010/2011 academic session.2. Undergraduates that had sat for all subjects in the final examination in the 2010/2011 academic session.3. Undergraduates that had received results for final examination in the 2010/2011 academic session. EXCLUSION CRITERIA 1. Undergraduates that are absent for the final examination during the 2010/2011 academic session.

  13. Bar Chart: Percentage of the Undergraduates’ Gender in each Year of Study

  14. Bar Chart: Percentage of the Undergraduates’ Academic Performancein each Year of Study

  15. Bar Chart: Percentage of the Undergraduates’ Adversity Quotient in each Year of Study

  16. Mann-Whitney test: To compare the Adversity Quotient between gender. p value = 0.149 (p > 0.05)

  17. Kruskal-Wallis test:To compare the Adversity Quotient between each year of study. p value = 0.120 (p > 0.05)

  18. Spearman test:To determine the relationship between Adversity Quotient and academic performance of year 1 undergraduates.

  19. Spearman test:To determine the relationship between Adversity Quotient and academic performance of year 2 undergraduates.

  20. Spearman test:To determine the relationship between Adversity Quotient and academic performance of year 3 undergraduates.

  21. Spearman test:To determine the relationship between Adversity Quotient and academic performance of the undergraduates.

  22. CONCLUSIONS • There is no significant difference between AQ and gender. • There is no significant difference between AQ and the year of study. • There is no significant relationship between AQ and academic performance (GPA) in each year of study. • There is no significant relationship between AQ and academic performance (GPA).

  23. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Biomedical science undergraduates YEAR OF STUDY GENDER X X • ADVERSITY QUOTIENT • Control • Origin & Ownership • Reach • Endurance X ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE (GPA)

  24. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Similar study on AQ according to their course and ethnic group. 2. Comparative study between undergraduates from public and private university.

More Related