1 / 25

Research Council Grants on Web Systems

The IRIOS Workshop held in London on July 22, 2011, discusses the insufficient motivation among academic authors to self-archive in institutional repositories. To address this issue, we recommend that Research Councils and government funders mandate that researchers deposit copies of their articles in their institution's repository within one month of publication, or a mutually agreed timeframe. This policy is vital for improving open access and promoting better integration of research outputs across various platforms, ultimately benefiting the academic community.

jesse
Télécharger la présentation

Research Council Grants on Web Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Council Grants on Web Systems Gerry Lawson IRIOS Workshop, London 22.7.11

  2. Academic authors currently lack sufficient motivation to self–archive in institutional repositories. We recommend that the Research Councils and other Government funders mandate their funded researchers to deposit a copy of all their articles in their institution’s repository within one month of publication or a reasonable period to be agreed following publication, as a condition of their research grant. Open Access - Select Committee on Science & Technology

  3. Integrated funder databases already exist (ERFF)

  4. Commercial listings of research projects are coming Scival Funding

  5. Government Research Stats are improving

  6. UKPMC already integrates inputs and outputs

  7. Core Entities Funder Institution Projects Outputs People

  8. Research Funders and Systems UKPMC Research Funders ROP Funder Institution ROD Projects EVAL Outputs People

  9. Research Funders & Systems UKPMC Research Funders ROP Funder Institution ROD Projects Eval Outputs People

  10. Research Funders & Systems UKPMC Research Funders ROP Funder Institution ROD Projects EVAL Outputs People

  11. Research Funders & Systems UKPMC Research Funders ROP Funder Institution ROD Projects EvAL Outputs People

  12. Research Organisation Systems UKPMC IR Research Funders Institutions Publn database ROP Funder Institution ROD CRIS LMS / OPAC Projects Eval Outputs People

  13. Other Systems in the HE Sector UKPMC IR Research Funders Institutions Publn database ROP Funder Institution ROD CRIS LMS / OPAC Projects Eval Outputs People HEFCE (REF, HESA)

  14. Overlay Services (~JISC) UKPMC IR Research Funders Institutions Publn database ROP Funder Institution ROD CRIS LMS / OPAC Projects Eval Outputs People HEFCE (REF, HESA) ORCID Juliet+

  15. Overlay Services (~Commercial) UKPMC IR Research Funders Institutions Publn database ROP Funder Institution ROD CRIS LMS / OPAC Projects Eval Outputs People HEFCE (REF, HESA) Juliet NAMES Web of Science Romeo

  16. RC GOW Issues • All receive datafeed from SSC Ltd • Some still frozen waiting update • Great variation (e.g. NERC gives financial breakdowns, ESRC gives outputs) • Councils have agreed in principle a common system • Desire to link inputs to outputs • Potential to link to impacts and datasets • Need for common export format (e.g. CERIF) • Need for authority files for people, institutions, departments, funders, output types, project types • How best to meet RO needs?

  17. AHRC

  18. BBSRC

  19. ESRC

  20. EPSRC

  21. MRC

  22. NERC

  23. STFC

  24. DRAFT Comparison of GOW Features – what do users want?

  25. NERC (ROD)

More Related