1 / 19

Session IV - Use of administrative data for data collection - Statistics Belgium

Session IV - Use of administrative data for data collection - Statistics Belgium. Geneva, 31 October – 2 November. Agenda. Administrative simplification techniques E-government XBRL standard Architecture Main results Lessons learned. Administrative simplification techniques.

jethro
Télécharger la présentation

Session IV - Use of administrative data for data collection - Statistics Belgium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Session IV-Use of administrative data for data collection-Statistics Belgium Geneva, 31 October – 2 November

  2. Agenda • Administrative simplification techniques • E-government • XBRL standard • Architecture • Main results • Lessons learned

  3. Administrative simplification techniques • Administrative simplification techniques • Before 2008: • Gold-plating • Checking to what extent national surveys are in line with European statistical demands • Questioning fewer enterprises • Reducing sample size by using estimation procedures (threshold…) • Changing survey frequency • Reducing frequency • Avoiding double questioning • Information already known to public administrations is not asked for twice (administrative sources) • Such information is removed from the questionnaire • Using authentic sources

  4. Administrative simplification techniques • Administrative simplification techniques • Before 2008: • Avoiding double questioning: • Conclusion • Variables should be deleted only when entire sections of the survey form can be deleted. • Randomly deleting variables from parts of a questionnaire should be avoided as much as possible.

  5. Administrative simplification techniques • 3 questions needed to be answered: • How can we still delete variables from parts of a questionnaire when the information is already available in an administrative source? • How can we further reduce the administrative burden for enterprises? • How can we ensure greater consistency between data from administrative sources and survey data? • Solution = E-government • XBRL standard • Uploading information directly from the enterprise software • Pre-filled questionnaires

  6. E-government • XBRL standard • Electronic reporting language based on XML (open standard) for the exchange of business data through the internet, limiting operations as much as possible

  7. E-government • XBRL standard • Taxonomy • Xsd schema + 3 xml files (linkbases) • Xsd schema = type of dictionary in which elements are defined once • Linkbase: • Label linkbase: 4 languages • Reference linkbase: references • Presentation linkbase: tree structure of documents • Calculation linkbase (formula linkbase): order of operations • An Instance • Form with values

  8. E-government • “Form-based” approach • Starting point: defining the content of the questionnaire, related definitions and explanations • Mapping needs to already existing taxonomies • External (national) consistency (NBB, Ministry of Finance) • Internal consistency

  9. E-government

  10. E-government

  11. E-government • Mapping needs to administrative or statistical sources • Consistency between data from different public administrations or from different statistics • Investigating whether the information is directly available within the enterprise without requiring any transformation • Uploading information from the software • Taking into account data types

  12. E-government • Investigating whether the information is directly available within the enterprise without requiring any transformation • Close cooperation with federations and software vendors • Federations: • what are the most common software tools? • Promoting XBRL upload • Software vendors • Information on software products (content) • How are data ‘presented’ in the software?

  13. E-government • On the basis of mapping information, information from Federations and software vendors, we create the needed DTS • through a taxonomy editor or through SAS procedures • If it is possible to upload from software systems, the taxonomy is published on our website + the technical protocol and versioning • http://statbel.fgov.be/xbrl/ • Testing phase (about 3 months) for software vendors before the launch of the survey.

  14. Architecture • Main functionalities • Based on the XBRL standard • Generic (all (non-) dimensional taxonomies) • Uploading instances directly from software systems • Manual encoding in automatically generated web pages • Instant validation • Business rules through XPath (no use of Formula Linkbase) • The SAS-procedure generates a txt-file with validation rules • PDF report • Standard ETL to export data into DWH • Benchmark reports

  15. Architecture • Main functionalities • Pre-filling all data known (mapping) • Based on the mapping results, items to be pre-filled are identified • Pre-filled data are often: • Annual accounts (e.g. SBS) • Social Security (e.g. SES, Job vacancy…) • Data from other questionnaires (e.g. Producer Price Index) • Business register (all surveys) • Pre-filling possible through the creation of a plain file with data to be pre-filled • Independent of data source • Converting into a txt-file through the SAS-procedure • Architecture does not need to be modified if a new data source is available • Not only data from administrative sources are pre-filled, but also data from other surveys

  16. Architecture

  17. Main results

  18. Lessons learned • Lessons learned • Absolutely necessary to share a unique identification number for enterprises • Upload: need to block pre-filled data • Push-on-the-button solution • Price of the solution • Stability of the questionnaire • Real simplification • Sharing a standard among different administrations • Consistency checks for pre-filled information • Promoting the use of a web survey or upload by sector federations

More Related