1 / 17

A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

THE FOUNDATION FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT CHILD AND YOUTH WELL-BEING INDEX (CWI) 2007 SPECIAL FOCUS REPORT: International Comparisons of Child Well-Being Among English-Speaking Countries. A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

jhorwitz
Télécharger la présentation

A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE FOUNDATION FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENTCHILD AND YOUTH WELL-BEING INDEX (CWI) 2007 SPECIAL FOCUS REPORT:International Comparisons of Child Well-Being Among English-Speaking Countries A Social Indicators Project Supported by the Foundation for Child Development New American Foundation Presentation, July 17, 2007 Kenneth C. Land, Ph.D., Project Coordinator Duke University

  2. The Basic Social Indicators Questions • How are we doing? • More specifically, with respect to children, how are our kids (including adolescents and youths) doing?

  3. The Basic Social Indicators Questions These questions can be addressed by comparisons: • to goals or other externally established standards, • to past historical values, or • to other contemporaneous units (e.g., comparisons among subpopulations, states, regions, countries). The Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI) uses all three points of comparison.

  4. Our Annual Reports on the CWI show the following historical trend of U.S. child and youth well-being across the past three decades:

  5. The question remains: How well are America’s children and youth doing in recent years as compared to the children and youth of other nations?

  6. International Comparisons of Child and Youth Well-Being • To address this question, we compare U.S. trends in child and youth well-being with those of four other English-speaking counties, specifically: • Australia, • Canada, • New Zealand, and • the United Kingdom.

  7. These nations were chosen for a number of reasons: • all share a common language; • Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the U.S. are former colonies of the United Kingdom; • all five nations are liberal democracies that have representative democratic forms of government; • all five also place considerable emphasis on the use of economic markets for the production and distribution of goods and services; and • because of all the above, all share some common elements of culture.

  8. We assembled data on 19 Key International Indicators of child and youth well-being that were measured around the year 2000. • The 19 Key International Indicators can be classified into 7 domains: • Family Economic Well-Being, • Social Relationships, • Health, • Safety and Behavior, • Educational Attainment, • Community Connectedness,and • Emotional Well-Being.

  9. Table 1 presents a “report card” comparison of child and youth well-being by domain for the United States and the four English-speaking countries. The table indicates the measures used within each domain. • The B [W] indicates the rates for the U.S. are better [worse] than for the comparison country. An = means the rates are equal. • A blank cell indicates no country-level Key International Indicator was available.

  10. Table 2 presents a different perspective on these international comparisons: • a summary of the relative ranking of the five Anglophone countries based on each of the seven child and youth well-being domains and indicators.

  11. The domain-specific rankings are based on the averages of the rankings of the indicators within each domain. • They range from ‘1’, the highest ranking of child well-being, down to ‘5’ (or ‘4’ for social relationships), which indicates the lowest ranking among the five countries. • Two composite rankings for each country are given at the bottom of the table – • the average rank across the 7 domains, and • the average rank across all 19 indicators.

  12. Table 2. Relative Ranking of Five English-Speaking Countries for Child and Youth Well-Being by Each Domain and Across All Domains and All Indicators

  13. Trends and Implication of Our International Comparisons: Overall Conclusions: • Although no country outscores the United States on all domains of child and youth well-being, our comparison shows deficiencies in U.S. child and youth well-being, particularly in Family Economic Well-Being, Health, and Educational Attainment domains. • On the other hand, the U.S. does relatively well on indicators in the Safety/Behavior, Community Connectedness, and Emotional Well-Being domains.

  14. Trends and Implication of Our International Comparisons: Overall Conclusions: • Our analysis of average rankings on all domains and indicators of child and youth well-being shows that the U.S. falls in the middle of the group, after Canada and Australia on the better side and ahead of New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

  15. The CWI on the Web: http://www.soc.duke.edu/~cwi/

More Related