1 / 14

Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview

Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview. Where We Were Where We Are Where We Are Going?. Where We Were. Through collaboration with CSSD all parole staff were trained in the LSI-R and ASUS-R in the summer-2008

jillian-bauer
Télécharger la présentation

Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Connecticut Department of CorrectionParole & Community Services DivisionAssessments Overview

  2. Where We WereWhere We AreWhere We Are Going?

  3. Where We Were • Through collaboration with CSSD all parole staff were trained in the LSI-R and ASUS-R in the summer-2008 • Parole and Community Service Assessment Policy established 9/19/08 • By the end of 2008 all parole staff were completing assessments

  4. Where We Are • LSI-R, ASUS-R and Case Management Plan completed on transitional supervision offenders and parolees. • Level of Supervision based on subject’s risk and need level from the results of the assessments. • All offenders (except GPS) released under supervision are on maximum supervision until assessments are completed.

  5. Levels of Supervision • Established by policy based on offender’s risk and needs assessment. • Can change throughout supervision based on program participation and compliance • Maximum LSI-R score 31-54 • Medium LSI-R score 19-30 • Minimum LSI-R score 0-18

  6. Program Referrals • Results from the assessments are used to develop a case management plan for the offender while referring offenders to the appropriate programs • Substance abuse • Domestic Violence • Mental Health • Anger Management

  7. Where We Are Going

  8. Gender Responsive Assessment Acknowledgements • Evaluation of Correctional Programs – Gender Responsiveness • Funded by the Office of Policy and Management • Grant No. 09AG652DOC1

  9. What is “Gender Responsive?” • Acknowledges the realities of women’s lives and how they may differ from men, including the pathways to offending and how relationships shape their lives. • Practices address issues like violence, abuse, family relationships, substance abuse, trauma, parenting, intimate relationships, poverty, and mental health.

  10. Gender Responsive Assessments • Women’s Risk/Needs Assessment (WRNA) (The Trailer) • Authored by Krista Gehring and Valerie Bell University of Cincinnati • New Haven, Bridgeport, Norwich • Staff trained on WRNA May 2010 by Dr. Cynthia Hirbour, staff psychologist • Summer-2010 sample testing of assessments in community on female offenders

  11. Gender-Neutral Risk/Needs Factors • Remember • Employment/Educational/Job Skills • Substance Abuse • Dysfunctional Family • Antisocial Attitudes, Values & Beliefs • Antisocial Associates • Antisocial Personality or Low Self-Control • Criminal History

  12. Gender-Responsive Risk/Needs Factors • Relationship dysfunction • Family conflict • Child abuse • Adult Victimization • Parental involvement • Parental stress • Housing safety • Depression/anxiety (symptoms) • Psychosis (symptoms) • And strengths (Self efficacy, family support, parental involvement, and educational assets)

  13. Goals • Create a seamless system (dynamic factors) • Classification (York CI) • Pre-Release • Community Supervision

  14. Final Review • Currently using LSI-R and ASUS-R • Testing WRNA in community pending implementation phase of grant which will involve further training and evaluation by trained experts from the University of Cincinnati • Goal is to incorporate the current assessment tools with gender-responsive assessment to effectively supervise female offenders

More Related