1 / 31

Quality Assurance in Higher Education

Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Flanders in a European Context. Joke Claeys Ghent University Department of Educational Affairs Division of Quality Management. Contents. - Evolution of the notion of quality The history of Quality Assurance in higher education

jillian-bernard
Télécharger la présentation

Quality Assurance in Higher Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality Assurance in Higher Education • Flanders in a European Context Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  2. Joke Claeys • Ghent University • Department of Educational Affairs • Division of Quality Management Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  3. Contents • - Evolution of the notion of quality • The history of Quality Assurance in • higher education • First generation of external QA • Accreditation and it’s • consequences Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  4. Quality has several definitions (Green, 1994) • Excellence • ‘Fitness for purpose’: ~ the aims of • the institutions • Meet some basic standards • Efficacy of realising the aims • Meet the needs and expectations of • the clients Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  5. Quality as excellence • - Popular notion amongst professors • and chancellors,… • Quality assurance (QA) is focused • upon the input Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  6. Quality= fitness for purpose • The notion is less absolute • Central issue: the aims of a • program/institution • QA is focused upon the processes • realising the aims • The function of improvement is the • most important Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  7. Quality: meeting basic standards • Reaction upon the relativism of the • preceding • Basic standards have to be met • Link with accreditation • QA is focused upon the output Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  8. Quality : Meet the needs and expectations of the clients • The point of reference is outside the • institutions: students, stakeholders, • society • Quality: a means of satisfying • external expectations • - QA is focused upon the output Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  9. History • 80ties and first half of the 90ties: • transition from ‘excellence ‘ to • ‘fitness for purpose’ • Second half of the 90ties: criticism; • introduction of ‘basic standards’ Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  10. QA in European Higher Education • Before the 80ties: individual • initiatives, no real general policy • Some historic factors: • More students in higher education • Economic crisis; less governmental financing • Governments want to control the use of financing Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  11. QA in European Higher Education • External factors have exercised the • strongest influence • Pioneering countries: The United • Kingdom, The Netherlands, Denmark • Countries as Belgium followed these • models (esp. The Netherlands) Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  12. Functions of QA in Education • Improvement and warrant of quality: ‘peers’ evaluate • the program and give recommendations • Accountability towards the government and the clients • (students, parents, employers) • Regulation and adaptation of the educational system: • QA indicators can influence rationalisation decisions,.. Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  13. QA has different subjects • Research: exists in the Netherlands • A study program (e.g. physics); all • institutions at the same time • A cluster of similar programs (future • development) • A whole institution (e.g. EUA in • Macedonia) Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  14. Internal and external QA • Internal: for use in the institution: • e.g. student questionnaires • External: the final judgement on a • program is made by an external • commission Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  15. QA in Flanders • Central element in the startup: • Decree on universities (June 12th, 1991) • Art 122 Imposes a continuous monitoring of the quality of education: internal and external QA are mentioned Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  16. Realisations: • Internal QA: student questionnaires • External QA: visitation (peer • review): first generation Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  17. External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 8 year cycle • A panel of experts judges the program • Result: • - a public report on all the important issues • - a related score list (comparison between • institutions is possible) • - recommendations for improvement Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  18. External QA: Visitations (peer review) • Phases in the process: • 1 .The program writes a self • assessment report. Professors, • assistant professors, students, • alumni,… are all involved. • A manual with guidelines is strictly • followed. Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  19. External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 2. - A commission of experts is • composed, on the proposal of the • programs involved. They act on a • completely independant base. • - Experts in the subject matter; 5 • persons, 1 president, 1 didactical • expert Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  20. External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 3. The commission reads the self • assessment report. • 4. - Site visit: 2,5 days • - meetings with professors, assistant • professors, other personnel involved in • education, students, alumni, study • guidance,… Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  21. External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 5. The commission writes a report • containing their evaluation of the • program, recommendations, good • practices,… • The different programs are also • compared. Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  22. External QA: Visitations (peer review) • 6. - The report is published and can • be consulted by future students, • newspapers, other institutions,… • - The Minister of Education gets a • report. • 7. The programs react upon the • recommendations and can make • adaptations to the study program. Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  23. Accreditation: a second generation of external QA • Antecedents: societal evolutions • Internationalisation: cooperation; • mobility of professors and students • Globalisation: a market for research • and study programs emerges • Liberalisation: commercial suppliers can • can organise education • - Evolution towards a knowledge society Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  24. Accreditation: definition • A formal, public judgement made by an independant body, based upon an evaluation of quality, guaranteeing that basic standards are met Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  25. Subjects in the self assessment, required for accreditation • Aims and objectives • Program • Personnel • Infrastructure and services • Internal quality assurance • Results: level and output Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  26. Internationalisation: Bologna • BOLOGNA: (19/6/99), signed by 29 • European countries • Goal: create a European space for • higher education in order to enhance the • employability and mobility of citizens and • to increase the international competitiveness of • European higher education Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  27. Bologna: specific goals (1) • adopt a system of easily readable and • comparable degrees, (also through the • implementation of the Diploma Suppl.) • adopt a system with 2 main cycles • (undergraduate and graduate), with first • degrees no shorter than 3 years and • relevant to the labour market Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  28. Bologna: specific goals (2) • establish an system of credits (such as ECTS) • also covering lifelong learning activities • promote European co-operation in quality • assurance, (aiming at comparable criteria and • methods) • promote mobility by overcoming legal • recognition and administrative obstacles (for • students and teachers) Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  29. Realisations in the QA area • ENQA: European Association for Quality • Assurance: ° 2000; www.enqa.net • Spreads information, ‘good practices’ • about QA in higher education to • European quality agencies, authorities • and higher education institutions Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  30. EUA: European University • Association; www.eua.be/ • had several projects about QA • procedures, QA culture, comparing • different countries • Accreditation is implemented in several • countries (e.g. Spain, The Netherlands, • Flanders, through new legislation) Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

  31. Functions of accreditation • Guarantee a certain basic quality of • institutions or programs • Reinforce the existing forms of QA e.g. by • strenghtening their sanctioning capacity • Create more standardisation of norms, • procedures and criteria, to enhance • comparability • Improve the public responsibility function of QA • by giving transparant info to students, parents,… Tempus Workshop Ghent, 19/10/05

More Related