1 / 22

Tiziano Virgili*

Hyperon enhancement at 40 and 158 A GeV/c. NA57. For the NA57 Collaboration. Tiziano Virgili*. *Università degli Studi di Salerno and INFN, Italy. Contents. ’ Physics motivation ’ The NA57 experimental apparatus ’ Multiplicity and centrality measurement (new this year)

jillpacheco
Télécharger la présentation

Tiziano Virgili*

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hyperon enhancement at 40 and 158 A GeV/c NA57 For the NA57 Collaboration Tiziano Virgili* *Università degli Studi di Salerno and INFN, Italy.

  2. Contents ’Physics motivation ’The NA57 experimental apparatus ’Multiplicity and centrality measurement (new this year) ’Strangeness production: transverse mass spectra ’Strangeness production: ratios and enhancements (new this year) ’Conclusions

  3. Physics motivation • ’NA57 physics goals: • study of the dependenceof hyperon enhancementson ’interaction volumedown to Nwound 50 ’collision energy (data at both 40 and 158 A GeV/c ’Data samples:

  4. Experimental apparatus B=1.4 T Target:1% Pb-Pb, 8% p-Be Scintillator petals: centrality trigger (Pb-Pb) MSD 1 & 2: multiplicity detector (Pb-Pb) Tracking device: silicon pixel planes (5 x 5 cm2 cross section, 50 x 500 mm2 cell size, total of 1 M channels) Lever arm: pixels + double sided mstrips

  5. Reconstructed decay topologies: W- L + K-( BR = 67.8 % ) X- L + p-( BR = 99.9 % ) L p- + p( BR = 63.9 % ) K0 p+ + p-( BR = 68.6 % ) • Charged decay tracks measured in the pixel telescope 5 cm 5 cm s 30 cm L p- X- Strange particle detection

  6. Selected signals (Pb-Pb) 40 A GeV 160 A GeV

  7. Multiplicity measurement dσ/Nch (barn) 158 A GeV/c Nch dσ/Nch (barn) ’Multiplicity measured in the range: 2<η<4 (158 A GeV/c) and 1.9<η<3.6 (40 A GeV/c) ’Measurement of dN/dη at the peak 40 A GeV/c Nch

  8. Pb-Pb 158 A GeV/c 0 1 2 3 4 Nch Centrality of the collision dσ/Nch (barn) ’Data are divided in 5 centrality classes ’N. of participants (wounded nucleons) are determined within the Glauber model. Nch

  9. dN/dη measurement ’General agreement at 158 A GeV/c; disagreement with NA50 at 40 A GeV/c ’Agreement for the participants between NA50 and NA57; disagreement with NA49 (larger values at the same centrality)

  10. Ratio of dN/dη (158 A GeV/40 A GeV) ln(17.3)/ln(8.8) (Corrected for centrality) ’Ratio close to a scaling with log(s)

  11. Midrapidity Yield (i.e. particles per event in the central unit of rapidity) • extrapolated to a common • y-pT region: • Enhancement: Strangeness production: Transverse mass spectra, Yields and Enhancements • Double differential cross sections • for each particle fitted to: • assuming flat rapidity distribution in the selected acceptance regions • Inverse slope of mT distribution ( T = Tapp ) free parameter of the fit.

  12. Transverse mass spectra (158 A GeV/c)

  13. Inverse slopes(158 A GeV/c) Pb-Pb ’ In central and semi-central Pb-Pb collisions (bin 1,2,3,4) we measure compatible slopes for particle and its anti-particle ’ This symmetry is less evident in p-Be

  14. Blast wave analysis Hydro-dynamical picture: the mT spectra are sensitive to the transverse flow Blast wave description of the spectra: Transverse flow velocity Transverse source size Surface velocity Ref: E Schnedermann, J Sollfrank and U Heinz, Phys. Rev. C48 (1993) 2462

  15. Blast wave fit to strange particles 53% most central events n=1 T = 144 ± 7(stat) ± 14(syst) MeV <b> = 0.381 ±0.013(stat) ± 0.012(syst) • T and <β> depend weakly on n=0, ½, 1 • n=2 casedisfavoured by data (bad χ2)

  16. With increasing centrality: Transverse flow velocity increases Freeze-out temperature decreases Earlier decoupling for peripheral collisions ? Centrality dependence of the thermal freeze-out in Pb-Pb at 158 A GeV/c 1s contours n=1 J. Phys. G, nucl-ex/0403016

  17. ’ Y/ sY ratio increase with energy ’Energy dependence weaker for particle with higher strangeness baryon density decreases with energy increase Energy dependence of ratios Centrality regions: NA57:0 - 11% STAR*:0 - 11% *Ref: Physics Letters B 567 (2003), 167.

  18. 3 2 10 10 Hierarchy of the enhancements (QGP prediction) 2 1 1 1 1 No enhancement Enhancements at 158 A GeV/c Factor  20 for  10 10 1 1 • Evidence of significant centrality dependence of enhancements in Pb-Pb (measurements in bin 0 essential) • Saturation for the two-three most central bins ?

  19. 10 (95 % confidence level) 10 1 1 Enhancements at 40 A GeV/c • Enhancements are still there at 40 A GeV/c, • with the same hierarchy as at 158 A GeV/c:E(Λ) < E(Ξ)

  20. Conclusions (I): • Multiplicity measurement: • Disagreement at 40 A GeV/c with NA50 • Agreement with other experiments at 158 A GeV/c • Ratio close to simple scaling with ln(s) • Transverse mass spectra in Pb-Pb at 158 A GeV/c: • Symmetry between hyperon and anti-hyperon in central • and semi-central Pb-Pb collisions (bins 1,2,3,4), not in p-Be • Description by common freeze-out adequate • Evidence for a centrality dependence of the thermal • freeze-out parameters

  21. Conclusions (II): • Energy dependence of ratios: ’weaker dependence for particles with lower strangeness content (larger baryon density at lower energy) • Strangeness enhancement 40 vs 158 A GeV/c: • ’Enhancement of midrapidity yields at 40 A GeV/cof thesame order as at 158 A GeV/c, and with the same hierarchy :E(Λ)<E(Ξ)

  22. The NA57 Collaboration Athens, Greece; Bari, Italy; Bergen, Norway ;Birmingham, UK; Bratislava, Slovakia; Catania, Italy; CERN, Switzerland; Kosice, Slovakia; Oslo, Norway; Padua, Italy; Paris, France; Prague, Czech Republic; Rome, Italy; Salerno, Italy;St. Petersburg, Russia; Strasbourg, France; Utrecht, The Netherlands.

More Related