1 / 26

The Shaping of China’s Postdoctoral Community

The Shaping of China’s Postdoctoral Community. Andrea Lynn Stith, PhD Shanghai Jiao Tong University AC21 Annual Forum 2010 October 19-20, 2010. Research. Characterize postdoctoral researchers in China Limited discussion, information, and data

jin
Télécharger la présentation

The Shaping of China’s Postdoctoral Community

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Shaping of China’s Postdoctoral Community Andrea Lynn Stith, PhD Shanghai Jiao Tong University AC21 Annual Forum 2010 October 19-20, 2010

  2. Research • Characterize postdoctoral researchers in China • Limited discussion, information, and data • Understand impacts of policy and internationalization • Add to global conversation • purpose • mechanisms • effectiveness

  3. Significance of internationalization • Key issue for nations, institutions and individuals • Researchers with highest and best qualifications • Researchers increasingly mobile

  4. Significance of postdoc population • Products of the education system • Key to research productivity • Important to future competitiveness

  5. Key measures • Demographics • Total population • Length of appointment • Employability • Research productivity • Individual • Satisfaction • Accomplishments/productivity • Career prospects

  6. Internationalization and postdocs • United States • Growth in postdoctoral population • Increasing likelihood, duration and number of positions held • Low salary • Increased professionalization of the postdoc • Increasing concern about career prospects • International collaboration

  7. Postdoc systemChina • Established 1985 • Boost national competitiveness • Attract returnees from abroad • Centralized System • Postdocs, mentors, and departments are government approved and assessed • Two-year appointments (3 with approval) • Six-year maximum

  8. Postdoc systemChina • Postdoctoral training now a permanent element of the Chinese research system • Designed to attract elite Chinese talent, both abroad and in China • Chinese students have demonstrated their preference for foreign doctoral degrees • Low return rates

  9. Postdoctoraltrends • Expansion of system • Number of postdocs continues to rise • Most postdocs are domestically trained • Concerns of quality and competitiveness • Employability a rising concern • Little diversification within the system

  10. Postdoctoralappointments

  11. Returnees as portionof new appointments Data Sources: (National Postdoctoral Management Committee, 2008; Yao, 2007)

  12. Postdocs by discipline

  13. Postdoctoral“stations”

  14. Postdocs by region Data Source: National Postdoctoral Management Committee. http://www.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/program/issue/pop_win.asp?id=5511

  15. Out-bound postdocemployment

  16. Out-bound PekingUniversity postdocs Employment Prospects for Peking University Postdoctoral Scholars, 1988-2005

  17. SJTU postdocs Source: SJTU Human Resources. (2010). Personal Communication.

  18. Demand for talent • Continued investment fed steady demand for postdoctoral researchers • Meagerly paid and temporary postdoctoral positions • Returnees receive generous packages • Central government policies and inter-city competition encourages returnees • Competition among universities, research laboratories and enterprises provide incentives

  19. Concerns aboutpostdoc experience • “Dual identity” as trainees and researchers • Funding mechanism • Quality • Diversity of participation • Career opportunities

  20. Returnee bias • Returnees generally higher quality • Due to overseas training • Those who go abroad are most talented • Overseas experience requisite for faculty appointments Source: Zweig (2006) Competing for Talent.

  21. Returnee bias • Zweig finds through survey analysis: • Returnees possess skills, information and research methodologies generally unavailable to people who have not gone abroad. • Have stronger global networks. • Receive more grants and fellowships. • Publish more in international journals Source: Zweig (2006) Competing for Talent.

  22. Sample returnee programs • Changjiang Scholars Program (1998) • 14000 scholars, 130 Chinese universities • Spring Light Program (1997) • 12000 scholars, on short term basis • Hundred Talents Program (1994) • by Chinese Science Academy • Business enterprises • 50 returnee entrepreneurial parks • over 10000 enterprises set up by returnees Source: Wang Huiyao, Center for China and Globalization (CCG)

  23. Sample returnee programs • New “Thousand Talent Program” (2009) • 5 to 10 year deadline • Raise research level • Improve academic environment • Attract top talent from overseas • Central government to attract 2000 • Nine provincial governments to attract 1000 each

  24. Returnee concerns • “Truly” talented people stay abroad • Getting returnees to stay is a problem • Readjustment can be a problem • Example: there are signs that the quality of people accepted by CAS under the Hundred Talents Program may be declining Source: Zweig (2006) Competing for Talent.

  25. Impact on domestic trainees • Postdoc is a career requirement but careers stymied by preferences for returnees • Postdoctoral system not effective at boosting domestically trained talent

  26. Future questions • Are domestic postdocs members of a sub-class of elite scientists? • How can playing field be leveled? • Is the continuing growth of the postdoctoral community in China of concern?

More Related