1 / 30

Collaborators: Ragu Murtugudde: ESSIC/UMD Robert Le Borgne: IRD, New Caledonia

Phytoplankton C:Chl difference between tropical Pacific & Atlantic: Implications for C estimates Wendy Wang University of Maryland/ESSIC. Collaborators: Ragu Murtugudde: ESSIC/UMD Robert Le Borgne: IRD, New Caledonia Mike Behrenfeld: Oregon State University

joancox
Télécharger la présentation

Collaborators: Ragu Murtugudde: ESSIC/UMD Robert Le Borgne: IRD, New Caledonia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phytoplankton C:Chl difference between tropical Pacific & Atlantic: Implications for C estimates Wendy WangUniversity of Maryland/ESSIC Collaborators: Ragu Murtugudde: ESSIC/UMDRobert Le Borgne: IRD, New Caledonia Mike Behrenfeld: Oregon State University Emmanuel Boss: University of Maine Susan Brown: SOEST/Hawaii Uni. Emilio Maranon: University of Vigo, Spain

  2. Outline • Motivation/Scientific Question • Modeling Approach • Results & Conclusion • Future Work

  3. Surface chlorophyll from SeaWiFS • Pacific: 0.1-0.3 • Atlantic: 0.1-0.5

  4. A big question: Is carbon biomass lower in tropical Pacific than Atlantic? Basin-scale C:Chl ratio!!

  5. Basin-scale Modeling • Model derivation & cal/val in Pacific • Model application & cal/val in Atlantic • Comparison of C:Chl & carbon biomass between Pacific and Atlantic

  6. A fully coupled basin-scale model OGCM: Gent & Cane (1989) Murtugudde et al.(1996) Ecosystem model: Christian et al.(2001) Wang et al. (2006a) Wang et al. (2008) C chemistry model: Wang et al. (2006b) Phyto. dynamic model: Wang et al.(2009) Atm. Forcing/ SAM (PAR) (AT, WS, SR, P) (WS) PDM (C:Chl) (t) DMEC OGCM (N) (u, v, t, s)

  7. Dynamic Ecosystem-Carbon Model Chlorophyll

  8. C:Chl vs. depth (data from Le Bouteiller et al., 2003) 0° η0 3°S • Linear decrease in EZ • Similar value at ED • C:Chl (<3μm): • 0°: ~140 • 3°S: ~220 , , , ηMIN (<3μm)

  9. Parameterization of vertical C:Chl (η)(Wang et al., 2009) (ZE: euphotic depth) , , ,

  10. Surface C:Chl vs. growth rate (μ0*)(Le Bouteiller et al., 2003) Community • Non-light limitation: • η0 linearly decrease with μ0* • C:Chl ratio: • higher in small cell than large cell , , , Small cells (<3μm)

  11. Parameterization of surface C:Chl (Wang et al., 2009) , , , , ,

  12. Model (Wang et al., 2009) Data (180°, Oct-Nov, 96)(Brown et al. 2003)

  13. Model & data agree: • C: highest at 0° • DCM: depth & Chl conc. • C:Chl: 80-140 (surface) • ~40 at 100 m

  14. Dataset for model cal/val in Pacific

  15. Data distribution in eq. Pacific 1996 2005 2006 2007 1994/96

  16. Model Data DCM depth: ~100m in WP ~50m in CEP Chl. in WP ML: <0.1 Chl. at DCM: 0.2-0.3

  17. SeaWiFS, model, in situChl

  18. Surface Chl: model vs. SeaWiFS

  19. Interannual variation (5°N-5°S)

  20. Model skills , , , • R: 03-0.7 • NSD: 1-1.5 • Z. R > M. R • Spat/Temp: • R>0.7 • NSD=1

  21. Summary (eq. Pacific) • PDM reproduces zonal DCM: ~100 m in WP ~50 m in C/EEP • Spatial & temporal variations: Interannual: model & data agree well HNLC frontal features

  22. AMT 1-12 (1995-2000): • Bio-optical • Phytoplankton • Zooplankton • AMT-3: • (Sep-Oct, 96) • Chlorophyll • Carbon • Nitrate • PP

  23. Model vs. data • Surface chl: • The same (0.1-0.2) • DCM chl: • Model > data • DCM depth: • The same (50-150m)

  24. Model vs. data • Surface C: • Similar (8-16) • DBM C: • ? • DBM depth: • Similar?

  25. Model vs. data (1997-2007) surface Chl in Atlantic Open ocean:similar magnitude & spatial pattern

  26. Summary (eq. Atlantic) • PDM reproduces meridional DCM: South: >120 m North: ~50 m • Surface C & Chl: Model & data agree well

  27. Pacific vs. Atlantic , , ,

  28. Surface averages (model/data)

  29. Conclusion • Chl: Pacific < Atlantic • C:Chl ratio: Pacific > Atlantic • Carbon: Pacific ≥ Atlantic

  30. Future work • What about primary production? • C:Chl ratio: Pacific > Atlantic • Growth rate: Pacific < Atlantic • PP: ??? • Temporal variability? • Pacific: interannual > seasonal • Atlantic: ???

More Related