1 / 12

Part of discussion led by Oliver Bruning, CERN Vladimir Shiltsev, LARP/Fermilab

Soft Ranking of LHC Upgrade Possibilities. Part of discussion led by Oliver Bruning, CERN Vladimir Shiltsev, LARP/Fermilab. Factors to be considered. Whether technology available if not – when Cost of the Upgrade <few MEU,<few 10s M,<few 100sM Time to construct & install

joanne
Télécharger la présentation

Part of discussion led by Oliver Bruning, CERN Vladimir Shiltsev, LARP/Fermilab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Soft Ranking of LHC Upgrade Possibilities Part of discussion led by Oliver Bruning, CERN Vladimir Shiltsev, LARP/Fermilab

  2. Factors to be considered • Whether technology available • if not – when • Cost of the Upgrade • <few MEU,<few 10s M,<few 100sM • Time to construct & install • Luminosity gain • Physics risk to not get the gain • e.g. energy deposition, BB, optics LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  3. LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  4. Thus: • Group A (definetely explore) • all collimator projects • both quad first paths • b-b compensation schemes: W, EL • Group B (carefully look into) • Short bunch and 12.5-75 ns • Dipole first • Crab crossing LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  5. “Worth the buck?”: • Tev(RHIC?) rule of thumb: 1M$ upgrade  2-4% in Lumi • Group A • feedback • b-b compensation schemes: W, EL • new collimation schemes • both quad first paths • new 12.5-75ns schemes • Group B (carefully look into) • Short bunch • All IR upgrades LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  6. Manager’s View Depends on “Manager’s Model”  assume intelligent manager: • Paranoic – minimize the risk • Assure SOME improvement • Start long lead projects ASAP LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  7. LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  8. Thus: • Group A (DO NOW) • both quad first paths • Magnet R&D… Magnet R&D…MagnetR&D • Group B (support now , be prepared to do later) • feedback • collimator schemes (RC, LEL, Crystals) • beam-beam compensation schemes • Group C (make sure assumptions/ estimates right, before rule out): • dipole first • short bunches • crab crossing LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  9. Possible Action Items (I) • MAGNETS – all has been said already • MARS and Fluka has to agree (resolve ~2 difference) LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  10. Possible Action Items (II) • On a way to decision in ~1 yr: • Riccardo to wrap up dipole first analysis • Work with Tanaji (visit FNAL for ~mos) and Ramesh (a week at BNL) • Rama to finish crab cavity analysis • Given Ohmi’s error – reconsider tolerances • Learn from KEK experience • Generate the most attractive proposal • Short bunches so attractive • Make one more inventive/critical look LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  11. Possible Action Items (III) • Deeper collaborative look into items promising a lot of return for small investment: • collaboration important as CERN people to be busy with commissioning while “helpers” don’t “feel” the machine well • beam demonstrations most convincing • allow to attract and keep younger scientists interested • Therefore: • Expand beam-beam simulations collaboration on LEL (Ulrich, VS, FZ) LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

  12. Cont’d • simulate LEL hollow collimator (Rogelio, , FZ, VS) • look into low-noise FB tolerances (??) • crystal collimation design considerations (Walter+LARPies) • full support of BBLR MDs at RHIC and rotating collimators (LARPies) • very low beta* solutions very sesnsitive to vibrations, need to look into tolerances and research vibration levels, including beam screen jitter(Riccardo, Vladimir) LHC Upgrades – O.Bruning, V.Shiltsev

More Related