1 / 13

Sub-regional working in transport

Sub-regional working in transport. Charlotte Dixon Regional and Local Transport Strategy and Funding DfT. The need for joint planning and delivery in transport Progress to date: examples of local authority success The draft Local Transport Bill How does this “fit” with MAAs?.

jody
Télécharger la présentation

Sub-regional working in transport

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sub-regional working in transport Charlotte Dixon Regional and Local Transport Strategy and Funding DfT

  2. The need for joint planning and delivery in transport • Progress to date: examples of local authority success • The draft Local Transport Bill • How does this “fit” with MAAs?

  3. The need for joint planning and delivery in transport: Existing arrangements • Most transport powers in England outside London are held by: • County or Unitary Councils outside the six former met counties • Passenger Transport Authorities and Metropolitan District Councils in the metropolitan areas • Powers and duties are widely drawn, in recognition that different areas have different priorities • But transport needs often don’t fit with local authority boundaries

  4. Progress to date: The Local Transport Plan • Local Transport Authorities have duty to include their policies in a Local Transport Plan • In the former metropolitan areas the duty is a joint duty on the PTA and the MDCs • Elsewhere, local authorities can use general local government powers to prepare joint plans if they wish • All authorities produced their second 5-year LTPs to start in April 2006.

  5. Joint LTP Planning Joint LTPs were prepared by: • PTA and MDCs: Tyne & Wear, Merseyside, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, West Midlands • Four unitary authorities: Greater Bristol • Urban unitary plus part of a county: Greater Nottingham, Derby Joint, North Staffordshire, Luton & Dunstable, Central Leicestershire • Two unitaries plus part of a county: South East Dorset

  6. Greater Nottingham Plan Area • 1x unitary authority (City of Nottingham) • Plus part of Nottinghamshire County Council: • 3 x districts (Broxtowe, Gedling, Rushcliffe) • 1 x part of a district (Hucknall electoral wards of Ashfield district)

  7. Perceived benefits of joint working • Economies of scale • Access to shared resources • More efficient use of resources • Transport planning & delivery matched to functional areas

  8. Funding arrangements • Most transport funding is through RSG and two large capital blocks for Integrated Transport and Highway Maintenance • Blocks are distributed to authorities by needs-based formula • Where authorities prepare joint plans, DfT takes advice from the authorities on how funding should be distributed between them

  9. Other Joint Planning The Tees Valley example: Middlesbrough, Darlington, Redcar & Cleveland, Hartlepool and Stockton-on-Tees The Solent example: Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton • 20 year sub-regional strategies • Individual LTPs: 5 year plans for transport • Solent Transport Partnership – highways, bus, trains, HA

  10. Draft Local Transport Bill • Enables reviews of transport governance in metropolitan areas and elsewhere • Enables establishment of joint authorities outside existing PTA areas • Can also cover membership, powers, boundaries etc • Proposes that in metropolitan areas PTA should lead on joint Plan

  11. How does this fit with MAAs? • We already have joint planning, reporting, targets, funding and delivery in many areas • Some important metrics, eg congestion, bus patronage, only sensible at sub-regional level • Currently transport targets are not agreed with government. • But LAAs will include the possibility of “designated” transport targets • Should be straightforward to allow this also for joint Plans, with the contribution to the designated target included as one of the 35 targets for each of the relevant authorities • DfT welcomes the possibility of transport being embedded in wider sub-regional agreements

More Related