1 / 26

Identification and Management of Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer

Identification and Management of Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer. Kevin S.Hughes, MD, FACS Co-Director, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center Massachusetts General Hospital Surgeon The Newton-Wellesley Hospital Breast Center. Saslow D et. al. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75.

joel-foster
Télécharger la présentation

Identification and Management of Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Identification and Management of Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer Kevin S.Hughes, MD, FACS Co-Director, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center Massachusetts General Hospital Surgeon The Newton-Wellesley Hospital Breast Center

  2. Saslow D et. al. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75 Saslow D et. al. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75

  3. ACS MRI Guidelines Saslow D et. al. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75

  4. 10,000 4/1/2006 to 9/17/2007 HORMONES NULL or No Never 7,821 W/ Gail Score 6,981 W/ BRCAPRO Lifetime 6,028 W/ BRCAPRO Mutation and Tyrer-Cuzick 5,894 LCIS/AH status not available

  5. ACS MRI Guidelines Exclude Gail Model • …less useful than BRCAPro, Claus, and Tyrer-Cuzick • …not adequate for evaluating family history Therefore we do not recommend its use for evaluating patients for breast MRI screening Online Supplemental Material

  6. ACS Guidelines • BRCAPRO • Tyrer-Cuzick • Claus • Gail Saslow D et. al. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75

  7. ACS Guidelines • Claus • Breast FH • BRCAPRO • Breast and ovarian FH • Tyrer-Cuzick • Breast and ovarian FH • Pathologic factors • Hormonal factors

  8. Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk 20% or greater by Model Tyrer-Cuzick= 330 (5.6%) BRCAPRO = 25 (0.4%) 10 276 2 13 0 31 10 Claus = 54 (0.9%)

  9. 20 to 25% LT Risk of…What? • Invasive cancer • BRCAPRO • Invasive plus DCIS • Claus • Tyrer-Cuzick

  10. Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk 20% or greater by Model Tyrer-Cuzick= 330 (5.6%) Adjusted BRCAPRO 61 (1%) 23 263 19 18 1 26 9 Claus = 54 (0.9%)

  11. ACS MRI Guidelines LCIS/AH Saslow D et. al. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75

  12. Tyrer Cuzick for AH & LCIS • 20% or greater lifetime risk • Any LCIS • age 69 and below • Any AH • age 56 and below Even more with even trivial risk factors

  13. IDing patients for MRI is not enough • Need complete risk assessment • Genetic testing as appropriate • Manage Breast and Ovarian Risk! Consider Genetic Testing if Risk Mutation is 10% or greater

  14. Better Strategy • Identify mutation carriers (genetic testing) • MRI for those with mutation (selective MRI) • Offer ALL risk reducing strategies • Oophorectomy • Prophylactic mastectomy • MRI • Mammography

  15. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Database • 18,190 screening mammogram patients 40 or older • (May 2003 – July 2005) • BRCAPRO run on all

  16. Lifetime risk ≥20% Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Database • 18,190 screening mammogram patients 40 or older • (May 2003 – July 2005) • BRCAPRO run on all 78 (0.4%)

  17. Lifetime risk ≥20% Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Database • 18,190 screening mammogram patients 40 or older • (May 2003 – July 2005) • BRCAPRO run on all 78 (0.4%) BRCAPRO 27 Predicted Mutation Carriers

  18. and Lifetime Risk <20% Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Database • 18,190 screening mammogram patients 40 or older • (May 2003 – July 2005) • BRCAPRO run on all Mutation Risk ≥10% 374 (2.1%)

  19. Mutation Risk ≥10% and Lifetime Risk <20% Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Database • 18,190 screening mammogram patients 40 or older • (May 2003 – July 2005) • BRCAPRO run on all 374 (2.1%) BRCAPRO 62 Predicted Mutation Carriers

  20. MGH Screening Data: All Comers

  21. What to do • ≥10% risk of mutation • Genetic testing • Positive-Manage with all modalities • Negative-Your call • Based on FH

  22. Options for high risk

  23. Options for high risk Chemoprevention Prophylactic Oophorectomy Screening

  24. Conclusions • ≥10% risk of mutation • Genetic testing • Positive-Manage with all modalities • Negative-Your call • Depend on FH • ≥20% LT Risk • Lots by TC • Almost all LCIS and AH by TC • Do they all need MRI?

  25. Kshughes@Partners.org www.HughesRiskApps.net

More Related