1 / 40

Introduction to Dairy Records SCAABP Dry-lab

Introduction to Dairy Records SCAABP Dry-lab. Andrew Fidler Oct. 12, 2009. Introduction. National Dairy Herd Information Association (DHIA) 4.4 million cows (47% of national herd) from 23,000 herds (2007) Dairy Records Managements Systems (DRMS) in Raleigh handles 69% of herds, 49% of cows.

joel-mays
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction to Dairy Records SCAABP Dry-lab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction to Dairy RecordsSCAABP Dry-lab Andrew Fidler Oct. 12, 2009

  2. Introduction • National Dairy Herd Information Association (DHIA) • 4.4 million cows (47% of national herd) from 23,000 herds (2007) • Dairy Records Managements Systems (DRMS) in Raleigh handles 69% of herds, 49% of cows

  3. Introduction • Why? • Determine baseline performance levels • Detect potential problems • Monitor change • Motivate change • Set goals

  4. Introduction • Records analysis will NEVER replace herd visits • Records can highlight areas of concern before a herd visit • Problems detected on-farm can be quantified by records • When you evaluate records, you should end up with more questions than you started with. • Keep it simple

  5. Benchmarking vs. Monitoring • BENCHMARKING • Using a “report card” to show past performance • Provides historical perspective (baseline performance levels) • Doesn’t accurately reflect current performance or predict future performance • Number-based • MONITORING • Tracking parameters (‘monitors’) to detect change or lack of progress • Measure impacts of management changes • Detect undesirable results • Motivate change • Question-based

  6. Monitors The Good The Bad Variation Momentum Lag Bias Proactive Measurable Impact Profit Result in Action

  7. Potential Problems • Variation • One number has a large impact on the result • Problem in small herds or small groups • Ex. Preg rate in small herds – palpating 10 cows, 1 cow will change the result by 10%. *Solution: Add more time to the calculation Ex. Calculate pregnancy rate for the last three 21-day periods instead of the last one.

  8. Potential Problems • Momentum • Too much time goes into the calculation • Makes changes difficult to detect (change is dampened) • Ex. Rolling Herd Averages, “annual” calculations *Solution: Use less time in the calculation Ex. Test Day Avg. instead of Rolling Herd Avg.; 21-day Preg Rate instead of Annual Preg Rate

  9. Potential Problems • Lag • Time between when an event occurs and when it is measured • Ex. Age at first calving – the actual event is the conception, but it isn’t measured until calving 9 months later *Solution: Monitor the earliest event Ex. Age at conception, or PROJECTED age at first calving

  10. Potential Problems • Bias • When data (or a population) is ignored or not included in the calculation • Ex. Conception Rate – measures conceptions per breeding, but doesn’t account for animals that weren’t bred • Out of 100 heifers, if 50 are bred and 40 conceive, CR is 80% (but 50 heifers not accounted for) • If all 100 are bred and 60 conceive, CR is 60%, but 20 more pregnancies have been created!

  11. Areas of Interest • Milk Production • Reproduction • Health • Herd Management (culling) • Heifers • Financial

  12. Records Analysis • Browsing the Herd Summary • Production-based Analysis • Question-based Analysis

  13. Milk Production • Rolling Herd Average • Average milk production per cow per year • Significant momentum; too many contributing factors • Test Day Average Milk • Most current average recorded daily milk production per cow • Many contributing factors (DIM, Lact. #, season, etc.) • Std. 150 Day Milk • Adjusts TD Avg. Milk as if each cow were at 150 DIM • Removes DIM as a contributing variable • Projected Mature Equivalent 305 Day Milk (ME 305) • Adjusts TD Avg. Milk as if each cow were a mature cow that had a complete standard lactation • Can compare groups or individuals regardless of DIM or Lact. #

  14. Reproduction • Days to 1st Service • Days from calving to first breeding • Affected by VWP, heat detection, and reproductive health • Service or Heat Intervals • Days between detected heats or breedings • Indicator of heat detection • May be affected by early embryonic death

  15. Reproduction • Conception Rate • Proportion of breedings that result in conception • “% Successful” on Yearly Repro Summary on DHI-202 • Biased – excludes cows not bred (missed heats  increased CR) • Services per pregnancy • Inverse of CR

  16. Reproduction • Calving Interval • Time between calvings • Biased – excludes 1st lact. Cows and culled cows • Lag – problem getting cows pregnant today doesn’t show up until 9 months later • Momentum – Calculated on an annual basis • Days Open • Time from calving to conception • Biased – excludes open cows, or has to make assumptions for ‘Projected Days Open’ • Momentum - Calculated on an annual basis

  17. Reproduction • Pregnancy Rate [# pregnancies created] / [# eligible] per unit time • “eligible” = open, beyond the VWP, not a “DNB” • Time • 21 d (or multiple 21 d periods) • Test period • Palpation day

  18. Health • Disease • Cows left herd • Often poorly recorded; inaccurate • Udder Health • Somatic Cell Counts • Categorized by Lact. #

  19. Herd Management (Culling) • Cows Entered and Left the Herd • Reasons often not reported • Appropriate culling % variable

  20. Heifers • Avg. Age at First Calving • Lag – event (conception) occurred 9 months ago • Biased – excludes heifers not yet calved • Avg. Projected Age at First Calving / Age at Conception • Minimizes lag • Biased – excludes open heifers • Avg. Age at First Breeding • Minimizes lag, momentum

  21. Production-based Records Analysis • Evaluate “Key Production Parameters” to identify problems • Investigate source of problems by evaluating “Diagnostic Indicators” • Based on benchmarks or industry standards

  22. Key Production Parameters • Herd Performance • Milk/Cow/Day • Lactation Status • Days in Milk (DIM) • Reproductive Performance • Pregnancy Rate (PR) • Udder Health • Somatic Cell Count (SCC) • Cow Management • Cull Rate (CR)

  23. Herd Performance • Milk/Cow/Day • The cheapest milk a producer can make is the next 5-10 pounds each cow produces • Fixed costs already covered; only additional associated costs are marginal costs – mostly feed • Goal: 70 – 90 lbs/cow/day

  24. Lactation Status • Days in Milk (DIM) • Production decreases .15-.20 pounds for every day past 150 DIM • Goal: 170-185 DIM • If higher, look for reproductive problems • If ok, but production is too low, consider fresh cow performance, peak milk, and persistency

  25. Reproductive Performance • Pregnancy Rate • Percent of eligible estrous cycles that resulted in a pregnancy over a given period of time • Goal: 22-25%

  26. Udder Health • Somatic Cell Count • Mastitis  lost income, higher cull rates, increased veterinary expenses • Goal: <200,000 cells

  27. Cow Management • Cull Rate • (Sold + Died) / (Avg. herd size) • High cull rates  Higher cost of replacements • Goal: <35%

  28. Scenario #1 • Low milk production • Check DIM. . . • Avg. DIM = 170 • Check ‘Production Diagnostic Indicators’. . . • Peak milk, Summit milk, Fresh cow performance, Persistency • Contributing Factors. . . • Dry cow management, Transition cow management, Cow comfort, Ration formulation and Bunk management

  29. Scenario #2 • Low milk production • Check DIM. . . • Avg. DIM = 250 • Check pregnancy rate (PR). . . • Most recent PR = 8%; Annual PR = 9% • Check “Reproduction Diagnostic Indicators” • Heat detection, Conception rate, % of animals not serviced by 70 DIM, services per conception, etc.

  30. Scenario #3 • High Somatic Cell Count (SCC) • Stratify somatic cell scores by parity and stage of lactation • Check udder health management practices, mastitis treatment protocols, milking procedures, environment.

  31. Question-based Records Analysis • Production: • How are the “good” cows doing? • How many “bad” cows are in the herd? • Are the fresh cows getting off to a good start? • Reproduction: • Are cows getting pregnant? • Will herd size be maintained? • Health: • How are fresh cows doing? When are cows getting sick? • How is udder health? When is mastitis occurring? • Herd Management: • Is culling appropriate? • Heifers: • Are youngstock healthy and performing?

  32. Production • Good cows: • How high are the highest milking cows in peak lactation? • DIM vs. Milk graph • Peak Milk • Bad cows: • <50 lbs • DIM vs. Milk graph • “Failures”: >100 DIM, <30 lbs, and OPEN • Should be <2% • Are the fresh cows getting off to a good start? • DIM vs. Milk graph

  33. Reproduction • Getting pregnant: • Pregnancy rate • Pregnancy rate by DIM • First Service – • Days to First Service (VWP + 18) • First Service Conception Rate (>50%) • Repeat Breeders – • Heat Detection (>70%) • Conception Rate (>40%); Services per Conception (<2.25) • JMR – • “Average Days Late”

  34. JMR (Average Days Late) • A current measure of reproductive efficiency of small herds • Based on how long it takes a cow to get pregnant after the VWP • Can adjust VWP for individual cows • Only counts open and unknown cows • A penalty is assigned to cows beyond the VWP that have not been diagnosed pregnant: • Diagnosed open: days since VWP • Not bred: days since VWP • Bred by not yet checked: days from VWP to last breeding • Assuming they are pregnant to avoid over-penalizing • Sum of penalty days is then divided by the number of breeding cows in the herd

  35. Reproduction • Will herd size be maintained? (“Pregnancy Hard-Count”) • Need 10% of milking herd in calvings each month • 65% of those from cows (+ 15% abortions) • 35% from heifers (+ 2% abortions) • Convert to a 21 d period by dividing by 30.4 and multiplying by 21 • Convert to a 2 week period to find out how many new pregnancies are required at preg check

  36. Health • Fresh Cows • Disease Rates • Fresh Cow Survival • Herd Health • Disease Rates • Why are cows leaving the herd?

  37. Health • Udder Health • Current SCC vs. Previous SCC graph • <20% SCC >4 • <10% chronics, <10% new infections • Stratify by Lact. # and DIM

  38. Health • Youngstock • Height and Weight tracking • Holsteins: 52 in. hip height, 75 lbs. at breeding (400 d) • 85% mature weight at calving • Disease Rates

  39. “Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.” • Albert Einstein

More Related