1 / 26

NICHOLAS

NICHOLAS. Drop-out prevention project progress March 2013 NDPC SD and WVDE. NICHOLAS COUNTY. Rural enrollment 4052 99 % white, 0.51% are black and 0.46% are other. 62 % free and/or reduced meals 18 % SWD. Our Team. Gene Collins Attendance Director/Social Director *

john
Télécharger la présentation

NICHOLAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NICHOLAS Drop-out prevention project progress March 2013 NDPC SD and WVDE

  2. NICHOLAS COUNTY • Rural • enrollment 4052 • 99% white, 0.51% are black and 0.46% are other. • 62% free and/or reduced meals • 18% SWD

  3. Our Team • Gene Collins Attendance Director/Social Director * • Nancy Losh-Teacher/Recorder • Bill Dobbins-HS Principal /Coach • Tom Bayless-Special Ed Coordinator/Behavior/Discipline • Erin Hickman-MS Counselor • Bethany King-MS Principal Team Leader * • Christina Bailey-Elem. Principal/Data • Kathy Sibbett-Special Ed. Director/Administrator • Kandy Rapp-HS counselor • Kristina Dotson- HS teacher • Beverly Kingery- Superintendent

  4. Starting points(before the project)

  5. NDPC-SD Technical Assistance Professional Development

  6. Research Areas of focus • Reduce failure rate English and math classes • Increase achievement scores WESTEST reading and math • Improve social/emotional well being

  7. Things we shared------** stood out to the team • achievement rates **achievement gap all vs. • SWD rates RLA/Math • dropout rates ** improvements made in last few • years • class failure rates ** in Math biological sciences • Other data sources: • Culture survey both high schools • Drop out survey data (dislike of school #1 • reason for drop out)

  8. Dropout Factors Students indicated they did not like school because they were not involved in sports or extra curricular areas. They were disengaged with school leading to the perception they were unpopular or not cared for by others. Academically, students (especially SWD ) indicated the work in RLA and math classes was too difficult and they did not receive enough assistance in subjects in which they struggled. • Attendance and Truancy Prevention • Behavior • Course Performance-Academic Content and Instruction • Student Engagement • Parent Engagement • School Climate

  9. Interventions • Expanded learning opportunities • Saturday attendance • Alternative school in two locations • Virtual courses • Homebound instruction/support • Community work based learning • After school programs • At risk interventionists all secondary

  10. Key Data • Superintendent/BOE staff information • NCLB private site grad rate and drop out rate • NCLB achievement data from private site for individual schools • WVEIS queries on course failure rate- both high schools When comparing data, we compared to state data in all areas in which it was available to us.

  11. Initial Plan • Initial focus covered broad areas of improvement in achievement scores and improvement needed in the areas of social emotional wellbeing for students. We had some drop out prevention programs in place (court/options pathways) . Team had strong consensus that academic improvement was the big area that needed assistance.

  12. Plan Revisions • Narrowed our focus • Added more steps/strategies that were doable at secondary school level. • Separated strategies and tailored them for schools. • Improved evaluation component of plan by addition of more concrete data collection in order to evaluate strategy effectiveness.

  13. Final Plan • Eliminated one step/program; too overwhelming for schools at moment • Added extra alternative school programs (Saturday school, virtual, alternative sites, afterschool programs, combinations of all) • Continued at risk interventionists at all middle and high school • Increased intensive SPL and behavior/strategy training at all schools/principals.

  14. Plan Evaluation and Adjustments • Phase I: Initial Plan Graduation rate increased 4% for all, including SWD Implementation of RLA program not implemented • Phase II: Revised Plan- Did not meet WESTEST goal in Math/Eng Co-teaching Math/English, 100% both HS Student mentor program developing in both HS Decreased Drop out rate slightly • Phase III: Final Plan - Clubs established at both HS- attendance good SWD projected Grad rate high at NCHS; d/o SWD low

  15. County Developed Resources/Tools

  16. WVDE: Cohort Document and Data • Reviewed lists for reasons for dropout. Cumbersome. does not mark students as SWD, or Low SES etc. Improvement suggestions • Give verbage instead of number codes for ease of use. • Mark students in columns provided

  17. WVDE: Early Warning System Tool Some Principals trained- usage is not high among these EWS Principal training scheduled Schools use self assessment, lists and SAT/SPL process to indicate at risk students in need of assistance in any area.

  18. Use of Funds 2011- Used for PD for book study with all Principals and stipends/subs 2012- Speaker for all personnel/ stipends/subs 2013- Plans to use for PD SPL training / co-teaching training

  19. Data Trends-Dropout academic difficulty and dislike of school consistently top two

  20. Projected Graduation/Dropout Results Drop Out Data Drop Out/Graduation Trends # drop outs % graduation rate

  21. Moving Forward and Next Steps Nicholas Co. continues to: • Require drop out conference with superintendent before drop out status is approved • Work with court system and DHHR to target students in trouble and at risk for drop out/failure • Provide academic/at risk interventionists at all grade levels all schools • Provide alternate learning environments for students who do not do well in ‘traditional’ school programming • Provide support in every HS math and English class with Special edCollab teacher Nicholas Needs to: • Inform all principals of current graduation rate statistics/trends • Brainstorm other ideas to increase grad rates- principals’ meeting, 5 yr plan focus requirement • Strengthen mentorship of middle and high school students • More frequent grade and credit checks

  22. Key Components of Plan Development Drop out conferences with administration. 1:1 face to face Provide academic support to struggling readers at middle and high school level Increase reading and math support at early elementary level (SPL that really works!)

  23. Key Components for Maintenance Continue • Alternatives to ‘traditional’ programming • And refine EWS usage • To involve all staff at all schools • To provide consistent early intervention to struggling students at early age and throughout all grade levels

  24. Lessons Learned • Schedule regular meetings or gatherings before the year starts and publish these dates • Reduce the number of committee members • Establish committees at each school with a county liaison identified • Stick with a good solid plan

  25. Contact Information Beverly Kingery- Superintendent bkingery@access.k12.wv.us Kathy Sibbett- Special Ed Director ksibbett@access.k12.wv.us 304-872-3611

  26. Thank you !

More Related