1 / 3

Discussion session Sep. 21 th

Discussion session Sep. 21 th. Questions on the low-lying ( “ pygmy ” ) dipole strength. Conveiners: G. Colò and T. Nakatsukasa Contributors: Y. Kanada-Enyo, M. Matsuo, K. Matsuyanagi, K. Yoshida. Questions. Structure of the PDR (IS/IV etc.)

jonah
Télécharger la présentation

Discussion session Sep. 21 th

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Discussion session Sep. 21th Questions on the low-lying (“pygmy”) dipole strength Conveiners: G. Colò and T. Nakatsukasa Contributors: Y. Kanada-Enyo, M. Matsuo, K. Matsuyanagi, K. Yoshida

  2. Questions • Structure of the PDR (IS/IV etc.) In particular: is the collectivity basis-dependent or not ? • Is is possible to define x such that: if | Sn | < x, then continuum shouldn’t be neglected; if | Sn | > x and/or no high resolution is needed, discrete RPA may be enough. • Deformation • Correlation with S

  3. Conclusions Tentative characterization of PDR: • should be different from threshold effect; • should be decoupled from GDR; • should NOT be 2-phonon state; • more than a few % of TRK sum rule should be found in a region of few MeV; • transition densities should be non-negligible at the surface (mainly neutron t.d.). Some definition of “collectivity” may be useful provided it is proven to be basis-independent.

More Related