1 / 13

Country-of-Origin Labeling

Country-of-Origin Labeling. Dr. Gary Brester MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics AGBE 315 Spring, 2014. OUTLINE. . The Issues . COOL and MCOOL Legislation . Research Results . Questions. OUTLINE. . The Issues . COOL and MCOOL Legislation

jonco
Télécharger la présentation

Country-of-Origin Labeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Country-of-Origin Labeling Dr. Gary Brester MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics AGBE 315 Spring, 2014

  2. OUTLINE • . The Issues • . COOL and MCOOL Legislation • . Research Results • . Questions

  3. OUTLINE • . The Issues • . COOL and MCOOL Legislation • . Research Results • . Questions

  4. Arguments for COOL • . Consumers have the right-to-know the source of beef products • . Improve food safety • . Increase demand for domestic beef • . USDA Grade stamps are brands developed by the U.S. beef industry • 5. Provision of more information • 6. Consumer studies indicate a willingness to pay premiums of 25%

  5. Arguments Against COOL • . Segregating integrated flows of beef and cattle will be expensive • . Some packing plants will likely cease operations • . Retailers do not want to segregate shelf space • . Most consumers will not pay premiums • 5. Industry response will be to add non- informational labels • 6. Has not worked for other products • 7. Why is this not done voluntarily? • 8. Harms Canada more than helps U.S.

  6. OUTLINE • . The Issues • . COOL and MCOOL Legislation • . Research Results • . Questions

  7. Legislative History • . COOL is mandated for most products by Section 304 of the 1930 Tariff Act • . Several agricultural products are on the “J” list (exempt from COOL) • a. Livestock (but not livestock products) • b. Fruits, nuts, vegetables • c. Products combined with similar domestic products during processing and marketing • . Products not on the J list require COOL until acquisition by the “ultimate purchaser”

  8. Legislative History • 4.The 2002 Food Security and Rural Investment Act added Subtitle D (COOL) to the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 • a. Instituted voluntary COOL in 2002 • b. Mandatory COOL in 2004 (MCOOL) • Includes unprocessed fresh, frozen, and ground beef and pork • Poultry was excluded • 5. GATT and WTO allows COOL (Article III-4) as long as foreign and domestic products are treated similarly

  9. Legislative History • 6. MCOOL was delayed by WTO and other negotiations • 7. Finally implemented in March 2009 • a. Muscle cuts of beef, pork, chicken, and other species • b. Exempted: • Processed meat products • Meat purchased at restaurants • Certain commodity meats (turkey) • 8. Label examples: • a. “Product of the U.S.” • b. “Product of Canada” • c. “Product of U.S., Canada, Mexico”

  10. OUTLINE • . The Issues • . COOL and MCOOL Legislation • . Research Results • . Questions

  11. A Priori Research Results • 1. Research based on cost estimates • a. $200 million to $6.4 billion for beef • b. $20 million to $1 billion for pork • 2. Brester, Marsh, and Atwood (2004) and Lusk and Anderson (2004) • a. Beef and pork demand would need to experience a one-time increase between 2% and 5% to offset the costs of COOL • b. That size of increase has happened before

  12. Ex Post Research Results • 1. Taylor and Tonsor (2013) • a. Quantify the demand increase caused by MCOOL since 2009 • b. Used retail level scanner data • Found no discernable effect on the demand for domestic beef, pork, or poultry • New Farm Bill requires more specificity • a. “Born in Canada, Raised and Slaughtered in the U.S.” • b. Ground beef can just list the countries • c. Still being challenged in the WTO

  13. QUESTIONS 13 Picture Courtesy of Clint Peck

More Related