1 / 1

-0.2

PEEP 10-5 r = 0.08. p<NS. PEEP 10-5 r = 0.3 p<NS. PEEP 15-5 r = 0.31 p<NS. PEEP 15-5 r = 0.618 p<0.05. 0.15. 0.15. 0.1. 0.1. 0.05. ∆ PaCO2%. 0.05. ∆ PaCO 2 %. 0. 0. 0.6. 1.2. 0.6. 1.2. 1.8. -0.05. -0.05. -0.1. -0.1. -0.15. -0.15. ∆ EELV 0 %. ∆ LV 20-abs %. -0.2. -0.2.

josef
Télécharger la présentation

-0.2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PEEP 10-5 r = 0.08. p<NS PEEP 10-5 r = 0.3 p<NS PEEP 15-5 r = 0.31 p<NS PEEP 15-5 r = 0.618 p<0.05 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.05 ∆PaCO2% 0.05 ∆PaCO2% 0 0 0.6 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.8 -0.05 -0.05 -0.1 -0.1 -0.15 -0.15 ∆EELV0% ∆LV20-abs% -0.2 -0.2 Figure E6. Left panel: correlations between percent changes in alveolar carbon dioxide pressure (∆PaCO2%) and percent changes in EELV0 (∆EELV0%) at PEEP 10 (open circles; p=NS) and at PEEP 15 (solid circles; ∆PaCO2%=-0.1444*∆EELV0%+0.043). Right panel: correlations between percent changes in alveolar oxygen pressure (PaO2) and percent variation of absolute lung volume at 20 cmH2O airway pressure (∆LV20‑abs%) at PEEP 10 (open circles; p=NS) and at PEEP 15 (solid circles; p=NS). Correlation between recruitment and respiratory system compliance The correlation between Crs and changes in EELV0 was reported in the main text. Here, we report the same correlation, together with the correlation between Crs and changes in LV20-abs (Figure E7). As observed for the gas exchange variables, when recruitment was expressed in absolute ml of variation, it did not significantly correlate with changes in Crs. However, there was a significant correlation when changes in both EELV0 and LV20-abs were expressed in percent variations. Crs was more closely correlated with changes in EELV0 than with changes in LV20-abs.

More Related