310 likes | 437 Vues
This presentation by Dr. Judith G. Gearhart delves into the role of standardized patients (SPs) in medical education and evaluation. It defines SPs, discusses their applications in training and assessment, and highlights examples of effective usage. Attendees will gain insights into developing scenarios, checklists, and case frameworks to improve employee performance. Topics covered include the history of SPs, their advantages, and their diverse roles in clinical training, evaluation, and human resources practices. An eye-opening session for educators and healthcare professionals looking to enhance educational methodologies.
E N D
Standardized Patients in Training and Evaluation Judith G. Gearhart, MD
Our Objectives • Define simulations • Discuss applications • Observe examples • Examine opportunities for standardized cases to enhance employee performance • Create a case framework • Collaborate
Topics of Discussion • Background and terms • Standardized patients in teaching • Standardized patients in evaluation • Developing scenarios and checklists • Resources
Background • “Nothing new under the sun” (1916-1963) • Standardized patients and OSCE used since the 1970s in teaching and evaluation • Incorporated into the USMLE in 2005 Step 2CS Exam
Definitions • Standardized Patients (SPs): “actors” trained to simulate a patient in a clinical presentation and to give trainees feedback on performance
Definitions (cont’d) • Virtual patients: online cases paper cases • Simulators: models manikins
Definitions (cont’d) • OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Exam): An examination assessing trainee performance in a simulated clinical setting using standardized patients and cases Uses objective checklists to determine whether trainee performs desired competencies
Also known as: • CPX (Clinical Performance Exam, Clinical Practice Exam) • PBA (Performance-Based Assessment) • CSA (Clinical Skills Assessment)
Definitions (cont’d) • OSTE Objective Structured Teaching Exam
Advantages of SPs • Validity • Availability • Reliability • Controllability • Adaptability • Minimal risk • Feedback • Extension of faculty
Uses of SPs Education : • Teach specific skills (interview, history & physical, diagnosis, management, procedures, professional behaviors) • Provide exposure to clinical problems • Teach how to deal with important issues (cross-cultural issues, ethics, delivering bad news)
Uses of SPs (cont’d) • Provide opportunities to meet educational objectives regarding variety and type of clinical problems • Provide cases trainees should, but might not see without planning • Give trainees feedback • Evaluate teaching methods
Uses of SPs (cont’d) Evaluation of trainees • Informal assessment and feedback (ungraded, “low-stakes”, pass/fail) • Formative or final assessment for grade (with or without feedback) • Assessment to determine progression to next level or licensure (“high-stakes”)
Other uses • Admissions of med trainees or residents • OSTE (Objective Structured Teacher Examination) • Human Resources • Practicing Physicians
Human ResourcesIssues • Hospitality receiving, registration, information giving, telephone etiquette • Confidentiality • Team interaction • Professionalism
Things SPs Can Do • Act out scenarios (history, physical, need for counseling or information) • Simulate physical findings • Use checklists developed by faculty to evaluate trainees objectively • Give trainees feedback
Abdominal tenderness Asterixis Carotid bruits Confusion Dilated pupil Gait abnormalities Hyper/hypotension Jaundice Sensory losses Sputum production Wheezing, asymmetrical BS Physical Findings that Can Be Simulated
Prior Development of UMC SP Program • Recruiting, screening, training patients to act out scenarios • Training patients to give feedback • Maintaining the standardized patient pool • Working out remuneration • Use of facilities
Development of UMC Standardized Patient Program (cont’d) Creating scenarios and checklists • Accessing those already available • Scripting from patient/employee encounters you’ve had • Scripting case for objectives
Developing Cases and Checklists First, determine objective for case • teaching, evaluation, or combination • teaching/evaluating what skill?
Developing Cases and Checklists (cont’d) What skill(s)? • Adapt for level of trainee • Adapt for time frame • Put in context of curriculum map or institutional goals
Developing Cases and Checklists (cont’d) Next, create the case (scenario) • Access those already available • Script from patient/employee encounters you’ve had
Developing Cases and Checklists (cont’d) • Identify minimal competencies/ behaviors/questions • List in appropriate sequence • Be specific • Use language that an SP will understand
Examples • Patient asks for directions/clinical information from employee who doesn’t know the answer • Employee encounters angry patient • Procedures (venipuncture checklist) • Model/mannequin cases (Sim center)
Examples • Admitting medical error • Obtaining informed consent • Delivering bad news • Telephone triage • Patient safety
Summary Using Standardized Patients can • increase learning opportunities through structured cases • Using standardized cases can provide another perspective of trainee performance • provide an objective rather than subjective, measure of skills
Resources • Bibliography • Web sites • Organizations • Clinical Procedures and Simulation Center • Clinical Skills Center