1 / 9

Modeling Teams: A General Systems Theory Approach

Modeling Teams: A General Systems Theory Approach. Advisor: Prof. Sara McComb (OM) Committee Members: Prof. Ronald Karren (OB) Prof. Soren Bisgaard (OM) Prof. Abhijit Deshmukh (MIE). Research Question Study Design Results and Contributions Dissertation Process Challenges.

jott
Télécharger la présentation

Modeling Teams: A General Systems Theory Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modeling Teams:A General Systems Theory Approach Advisor: Prof. Sara McComb (OM) Committee Members: Prof. Ronald Karren (OB) Prof. Soren Bisgaard (OM) Prof. Abhijit Deshmukh (MIE)

  2. Research Question • Study Design • Results and Contributions • Dissertation Process • Challenges

  3. Apply General Systems Theory to team modeling Dissertation Stage Theoretical Basis • Dissertation completed Research Question • Team Behavioral Research • Simulation Studies • General Systems Theory

  4. Study Design • Data Collected via Behavioral Simulation • Sample – 72 three person teams, face-to-face and computer-mediated condition (2 X 2 design). • Task – develop a work-force schedule. • Procedure – two sessions 45 minutes each.

  5. Results • Regression Analyses • Model Construction • Model Simulations

  6. Contributions • Theoretical: Social system modeling • GST applicable to social systems • Current empirical research can be organized following the framework developed • Hypothesized model can be estimated via multiple regression • Simulated models show dynamics • GST analyses provide complementary information • Practical: Team Behavior • Importance of learning and history • Differences between face-to-face and computer-mediated teams

  7. Dissertation Process • Proposal started – February 2003. • Proposal defended (6 chapters written and approved) – August 2003. • Behavioral simulation pretested – October - November 2003. • Behavioral simulation conducted – February – April 2004. • Data analyzed – July 2004. • Simulations completed – September 2004. • First draft of Results and Discussion ready – mid December 2004. • Second draft of Results and Discussion ready – end of January 2005. • Defense scheduled – March 4th 2005. • Defended – March 31st 2005. • Dissertation submitted to Graduate School – August 2005.

  8. Challenges • Time Management • All steps took longer than expected. • Writing. • Formatting. • Empirical data collection. • Allow enough time to notify participants. • Constantly remind participants to show. • Keep track of all data collected – tapes, recordings, questionnaires. • Collect all data that you can, even if it looks useless at the time. • Allow cushion time for unforeseen problems. • Working with the dissertation committee • Faculty are busy. • Don’t expect immediate reply. • Don’t expect them to remember intricate details from your statistical analysis two weeks after the meeting.

  9. Things That I did not do .. and regret it • Develop support system • Fellow students to talk for work. • Friends to complain. • Family/ Significant other for moral support. • Design relaxation technique • Devise alternative plan – what to do if the results are insignificant?

More Related