1 / 31

Techno-Economic Comparison of GPONs and Long-reach PONs

Farsheed Farjady Dr Marco Ruffini, Professor David Payne, Professor Nick Doran. Techno-Economic Comparison of GPONs and Long-reach PONs. Overview. 1.0 Intro to LR-PON and GPON 2.0 Advantages of LR-PON 3.0 Results 4.0 Summary. GPON Architecture with 21CN backhaul. 32-64 Customers.

jsweet
Télécharger la présentation

Techno-Economic Comparison of GPONs and Long-reach PONs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Farsheed Farjady Dr Marco Ruffini, Professor David Payne, Professor Nick Doran Techno-Economic Comparison of GPONs and Long-reach PONs

  2. Overview 1.0 Intro to LR-PON and GPON 2.0 Advantages of LR-PON 3.0 Results 4.0 Summary

  3. GPON Architecture with 21CN backhaul 32-64 Customers 2.5 Gbit/s downstream (1495 nm) Local Exchange ONU Backhaul to metro nodes GPON OLT ONU 1.25 Gbit/s upstream (1310 nm) ONU 20 km max

  4. LONG-REACH PONs (LR-PONs) 10.0 Gbit/s downstream 512 to1024 total split 10.0 Gbit/s upstream Flat Core Network Metro Node LOCAL EXCHANGE (by passed) 100 km OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS

  5. Advantages of LR-PON • Large split 512 to 1024 instead of 32 to 64 • Greater statistical multiplexing advantage. • Reduction in Electronic nodes and sub-systems • Lower cost, lower power consumption - greener network • Optical networks more reliable than copper. • Lower operating costs • 10Gb/s peak rate to customers (~10,000 times DSL rates). • 10 to 20 Mb/s sustained bandwidth (~200 times DSL rates). • Future bandwidth can be ~ 100 times greater via WDM • 5600 Local Exchanges in UK can be reduced to ~100!

  6. Techno-Economic Software Model Fibre cost data to create cash flows curves from Analysys Mason for BSG, 2008: “The costs of deploying fibre-based next-generation broadband Infrastructure”.

  7. Techno-Economic Software Model

  8. Cost breakdown

  9. Exchange Population

  10. LR-PON Cost Savings

  11. Reducing Take-up rate to 40%

  12. LR-PON Cost Saving

  13. Max bandwidth 1 Mb/s

  14. LR-PON Cost saving

  15. Max bandwidth 100 Mb/s

  16. LR-PON Cost Saving

  17. Effect of Take-up rate

  18. Effect of variable take-up rate population sizes

  19. 100 Mb/s maximum bandwidth Effect of variable take-up rate and

  20. Cash Flow Curves

  21. Time to Positive Cash flow vs. Take-up rate

  22. Effect of Initial revenue

  23. High and Low Exchange Population Exchange Population= 24645 e.g. Swansea Main, Wales Exchange Population= 5164 e.g. Glantawe, Wales

  24. Comparison of Total Costs vs. Exchange Population

  25. LR-PON Cost Advantage

  26. Comparison of Total cost vs. Take-up Rate

  27. LR-PON Cost Advantage

  28. Summary I • The model is a flexible analysis tool for comparing alternative architectures Current version includes: • LR-PON plus flat optical core • Standard GPON with 21cn type backhaul • The model predicts lower cost for LRPON as well as faster time to positive cash flow. • These advantages will be greater when power consumption models are added later in the project.

  29. Summary II • The model can produce: • Cash flow analysis • Component and sub-system costs. • Inventory analysis • Cost by region/geography, geotype or exchange area etc. • It is developed as a strategic analysis tool but could be developed for business case support in the future, if required.

  30. Acknowledgment We wish to thank Welsh Assembly Government for funding this project.

  31. Thank you

More Related