1 / 17

Solar Power @ Closed Landfills: Project Economics in Massachusetts

Solar Power @ Closed Landfills: Project Economics in Massachusetts. June 2009. Agenda Key Issues Impacting Project Economics Screen 1: Cost and Performance Screen 2: Incentives Case Study: 220 kW Solar Project Taxable Entity Owner Non Taxable Entity Owner Host w/ 3 rd Party Owner

jui
Télécharger la présentation

Solar Power @ Closed Landfills: Project Economics in Massachusetts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Solar Power @ Closed Landfills:Project Economics in Massachusetts June 2009

  2. Agenda Key Issues Impacting Project Economics Screen 1: Cost and Performance Screen 2: Incentives Case Study: 220 kW Solar Project Taxable Entity Owner Non Taxable Entity Owner Host w/ 3rd Party Owner Looking Forward Policy Tracking? Nexamp, Inc. Turnkey Clean Energy Solutions Provider. Leading Solar Installer Headquartered in Massachusetts. 32 Employees: engineers, designers, construction managers, installers, electricians, HVAC technicians, etc. Recipient: Association of Energy Engineers Best Energy Reduction Project in New England 2008. Introduction

  3. Landfill Solar Project Development • Nexamp Turnkey Installations Capabilities • Advisory Services • Technical and Financial Feasibility • Design and Engineering • Rebates and Incentives • Permitting and Interconnection • PPA and Other Financing Support Options • Installation • Operations and Maintenance

  4. Ground Mounted Experience • Nexamp ground mounted solar projects: • Attached • Ballasted (ideal for Landfills)

  5. Ground Mounted Experience As a sub contractor to BlueWave, Nexamp provided preliminary technical and financial assessment to Western Massachusetts Electric Company to support DTE Solar Program Filing.

  6. Today’s Assumptions • This presentation applies to the MA Solar Market as of last Monday. • Market is subject to rapid change (equipment cost and policy). • Solar is still very reliant on incentives and incentives remain the primary financial driver. • Only projects that qualify for Commonwealth Solar or a similar incentive make financial sense. • Land in MA is relatively valuable and finite. Even brownfields may have a competing use (e.g., park, parking lot, etc.). • kWh/sqft (power density) may be a more important consideration than it is in other portions of the U.S.

  7. Key Issues: Cost and Performance

  8. Key Issues: Focus on Power Density • February/March 2009 edition of SolarPro Magazine about the Tilt Angle and Power Density (kWh/sqft):

  9. Key Issues: Maximize Incentives • Incentives: Order of Importance on Project Economics • Commonwealth Solar Rebate or equivalent (~50% of project cost) • Federal 30% Tax Credit/ Grant for Taxable Entities • Federal Depreciation • MA State Tax Deduction • $/kWh energy savings and REC revenue • ~95% of initial investment recovered by first 4 incentives if you can use them!

  10. Key Issues: Maximize Incentives • Today’s MA market is rebate driven and rebates ($/watt) decrease faster than economies of scale improve as project size increases: Note: No Public Building Adder

  11. 220 kW Ground Mounted Fixed Tilt @ 20° Polycrystalline Modules Commonwealth Solar Rebate Eligible Scenarios Taxable Owner No Public Adder Non-Taxable Owner w/ Public Adder 3rd Party PPA Both Assumptions Installed cost: $6/watt Capacity Factor:13.2% Degradation: .5%/yr Avoided Electricity: $.14/kWh RECs: $.35/kWh for 7 years Inverter replacement in Yr. 20 25 year project life Previously discussed incentives as applicable Case Study: 220 kW Ground Mounted

  12. Case Study: 220 kW Ground Mounted • Taxable Owner: No Public Building Adder

  13. Case Study: 220 kW Ground Mounted • Non-Taxable Owner: w/ Public Building Adder

  14. Case Study: 220 kW Ground Mounted • Power Purchase Agreement: No Public Building Adder • $.11/kWh w/ a 3% annual escalator for 20 years w/ a 5 year extension option (savings is pre-tax)

  15. Case Study: 220 kW Ground Mounted • Power Purchase Agreement: Public Building Adder • $.07/kWh w/ a 3% annual escalator for 20 years w/ a 5 year extension option

  16. MA Conclusions and Outlook • Financial • Sweet spot is in 110 kW to 220 kW range • PPA make most sense for Public Entities • Tremendous value today, but expect changes • Outlook • Equipment Costs • Stimulus • Net Metering • CS Solar to S-REC Transition (better for larger projects?) • Increased use of Tracking Systems

  17. Contact Information • Dan Leary, Nexamp, Inc. • President and COO • phone: 978.688.2700 x706 • email: dleary@nexamp.com • Jon Abe, Nexamp, Inc. • V.P. Business Development • phone: 978.688.2700 x707 • email: jabe@nexamp.com

More Related