1 / 14

Authorship, Academic Integrity, and Ethics

Authorship, Academic Integrity, and Ethics. Dr. Heather Blain Vorhies hblain@umd.edu Office of Writing Initiatives The Graduate School 5 September 2013. Citation provides researchers and scholars with information to verify and build upon knowledge.

jun
Télécharger la présentation

Authorship, Academic Integrity, and Ethics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Authorship, Academic Integrity, and Ethics Dr. Heather Blain Vorhies hblain@umd.edu Office of Writing Initiatives The Graduate School 5 September 2013

  2. Citation provides researchers and scholars with information to verify and build upon knowledge. • As a researcher and a scholar, you are ethically bound to provide in-text citations and references. Some Basic Guidelines

  3. Readers expect that authors did what they say they did (Readers assume no data was fabricated or “lost”). Readers assume authors have no conflicts of interest. Readers assume authors are not taking credit for others’ work (Others’ work will be correctly paraphrased or directly quoted). Readers expect authors to be able to produce relevant data if questioned about their work. Readers’ Ethical Assumptions of Authors (adapted from Harmon and Gross)

  4. In-Text Bibliography Some Citation Examples from Physical Review D

  5. Be wary of categorizing something as “common knowledge.” • Many concepts and facts you might think of as common knowledge are not. • Even if a piece of information appears in many places (websites, textbooks), it does not mean the information is common knowledge. Common Knowledge

  6. Identify a concept that you would categorize as common knowledge. • Pull up several recent journal articles on the same concept (at least 3). • Do sentences with this concept include an in-text citation? How about somewhere in the paragraph? Is there an author name? A year? • Carbon is the building block for life. • The A567N52 sequencing chain has been found to impact potassium levels. The Common Knowledge Test

  7. Non-attribution is a serious academic integrity violation. • It happens when a writer does all or any of the following: • Does not list the source text in the references and include an in-text citation. • Copies and pastes the source text into a new text. • Never copy and paste text from one source into another unless • 1. The source text is your own and • 2. The source text is unpublished (in any form) and • 3. Other authors know that you are copying and pasting from a previous, unpublished text and • 4. You did not submit the source text for an assignment. Non-attribution

  8. Did you write the original text (the one being copied)? No Yes I wrote this outside of a class Do not copy and paste I wrote this for a class It hasn’t been published It was a collaborative project It’s been published It was an individual project Do not copy and paste Copying and Pasting Do not copy and paste You may copy and paste ONLY if you have permission to do so from each and every group member You may copy and paste

  9. Patch-writing Cheating • Patch-writing mimics the wording of the original text; some words may be changed, but the initial sentence structure remains. • Cheating involves (among other things) submitting other’s work as your own. Two Other Kinds of Academic Integrity Violations

  10. Patch-Writing Since QCD radiation implies energy-momentum flow, the entire energy distribution in the detector (upon reconstructing and removing X from the list of calorimeter hits) can be expected to provide a superior discriminant compared to jjin an inclusive selection. The energy distribution in the detector was expected to give a better discriminant.

  11. How do I know this information? (Did I personally observe it? Or does it come from another source?) What am I doing in this sentence? • Am I providing data? Am I referencing another’s work? • Am I paraphrasing from a text? • Am I making a comment? • Am I making an argument or summarizing another’s idea? Reviewing Your Work for Academic Integrity

  12. Always be explicit when checking if it is ok to use your material elsewhere. • “I would like to take the exact wording from pages 41-43 and insert these sentences into an article I am writing for publication.” • You must have all group members’ explicit permission to use material (writing and figures) elsewhere if the source text is a group document. • Never copy and paste unless specific criteria are met (Refer to the copy and paste flow chart) • Do not patch-write. It is an academic integrity violation. • Always cite your sources. Some Reminders

  13. The Craft of Scientific Communication (Harmon and Gross) • Overview of Common Scholarly Procedures (Duke University) • On Being a Scientist (National Academy of Sciences) • Ethics in Publication (Elsevier) • American Physical Society Publication Practices Tutorial • “The Science of Science Writing” (George Gopen and Judith Swan) Some Useful Resources

  14. www.gradwritingfellows.umd.edu Writing Fellows (Email: gradwritingfellows@umd.edu)

More Related