1 / 15

Pengelolaan Polutan Udara di dalam Ruangan

Pengelolaan Polutan Udara di dalam Ruangan. Oleh Sudrajat PPLH- Unmul 2003. Bioaerosol Samplers. Numerous sampler types Some adapted from dust or particle samplers Some designed specifically for microbes

justine-watson
Télécharger la présentation

Pengelolaan Polutan Udara di dalam Ruangan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pengelolaan Polutan Udara di dalam Ruangan Oleh Sudrajat PPLH- Unmul 2003

  2. Bioaerosol Samplers • Numerous sampler types • Some adapted from dust or particle samplers • Some designed specifically for microbes • Few specifically for non-microbial bioaerosols (e.g. endotoxin), but generally thought samplers used for microbe collection are adaptable

  3. Bioaerosol Samplers • Gravitational samplers (e.g. settle plates) • No special equipment only coated microscope slide, agar plates, etc. • Passive (non-volumetric), relies on collection of particles by gravity settling • Oversamples for larger particles • Poor for collection in turbulent air; affected by turbulent deposition or shadowing

  4. Inertial Bioaerosol Samplers • Allow collection of particles by size selective sampling • Includes impactors, sieves, stacked sieves • Relies on particle tendency to deviate from air flow streamlines due to inertia • Particles deposited to solid or semi-solid surface

  5. Spore Traps • E.g. Hirst, Burkhard, Air-o-cell, Allergenco • Initially designed for fungal spore and pollen • Sample at 10-20 Liters/minute • Particles impacted on to coated glass slide or adhesive tape • Advantages: non-selective, direct analysis after collection • Disadvantages: may mask problem species, does not assess viability

  6. Impactors • Similar to spore trap, but collection on slide or agar plates • Several designs tend to undersample smaller particles; particle bounce can also be an issue • Used at air flows of 10-30 Liters/minute • Types: • Single Stage or Multistage (e.g. Anderson) • Rotary arm samplers (e.g. Rotorod, Mesosystems BT550) • Slit to agar samplers • Sieve Samplers and Stacked Sieves (e.g. SAS)

  7. Impactors

  8. Impingers • Air drawn through liquid (e.g. water, broth, mineral oil), particles removed by impingement • Allows dilution • Problems with pass through, particle bounce, bubbling, evaporation of liquid loss of viability • Inlet efficiency decreased for particles above 10 microns • Sampling rate 0.1-15 liters/minute (12.5 for AGI 30) • Types: • AGI • Biosampler • Shipe • Multistage

  9. Impingers

  10. Cyclones or Centrifugal Samplers • Creation of vortex creating sufficient inertia to trigger deposition of particles onto collection surface; recovered in liquid (cyclone) or semisolid medium (centrifugal) • Allows dilution; high air sampling rates (up to 75-1000 LPM for cyclones, 40-100 LPM for centrifugal samplers); small pressure drop • Oversamples larger particles (can be used as trap); poor collection below 5 micron • Can be used in series or paired with other samplers to overcome sampling bias (e.g. Innovatek)

  11. Large Volume Aerosol Samplers • Biocapture BT 550 (Mesosystems) • Rotary arm impactor, liquid collection • 150L/min (~15 min) • Bioguardian (Innovatek) • Wet-walled multi cyclone, w/centrifugal impactor for removal of large particles • 100-1000L/min (1 min-12 hours) • Spincon (Sceptor) • Centrifugal wet concentrator, w/cyclonic preseparation • 450L/min (5 min-6 hours)

  12. Aerosol Samplers

More Related