1 / 54

Gene-Environment Interaction

Gene-Environment Interaction. AGES workshop, Fall 2012 Lindon Eaves – Introduction Tim York – Lots of slides Sarah Medland – Making it work. Genotype x Environment Interaction. Genetic control of sensitivity to the environment Environmental control of gene expression.

kacy
Télécharger la présentation

Gene-Environment Interaction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gene-Environment Interaction AGES workshop, Fall 2012 Lindon Eaves – Introduction Tim York – Lots of slides Sarah Medland – Making it work

  2. Genotype x Environment Interaction • Genetic control of sensitivity to the environment • Environmental control of gene expression

  3. The Biometrical Genetic Approach: GxE =Genetic Control of “Sensitivity” to environment See e.g. Mather and Jinks. Like any other phenotype – individual differences in sensitivity may be genetic

  4. Alternative ApproachGxE =“Environmental modulation” of path from genotype to phenotype See e.g. Purcell “a,c,e modulated by covariate”

  5. CARE! Results depend on scale – often remove GxE (and other “interactions” – e.g. epistasis) by change in scale Often try to choose units so model is additive/linear and simple. “Simplicity is truth” (?)

  6. “Environment” • Micro-environment (unmeasured, random) “E” and “C” in twin models • Macro-environment (measured, ?”fixed”) SES, life events, exposure, smoking • “Independent” (of genotype) • “Correlated with genotype – of individual (“active/evocative”) or relative (“passive”)

  7. Animals, Plants and Microorgansims • GxE common property of genetic systems • Ranking of lines/strains changes over environments: ?“genetic correlation across environments” • Polygenic: genes affecting response to E widely distributed across genome (Caligari and Mather) • GxE usually small relative to main effects of G and E (“power”?) • Can select separately for means and slopes (“different genes cause GxE”) • Some genes affect response to specific environmental features (Na, K, rain, diet, separation) • Some genes affect response to overall quality of environment (“stress”) • GxE adaptive – own genetic architecture (A,D etc) – genetic vulnerability, resilience, sensation-seeking, harm avoidance (rGE) • GxE scale dependent – choose units of measurement

  8. Genotype x Environment Interaction

  9. Where does GxE go in “ACE” model? • AxE -> “E” • AxC -> “A” See Jinks, JL and Fulker, DW (1970) Psych. Bulletin

  10. Contributions of Genetic, Shared Environment, Genotype x Shared Environment Interaction Effects to Twin/Sib Resemblance In other words—if gene-(shared) environment interaction is not explicitly modeled, it will be subsumed into the A term in the classic twin model.

  11. Contributions of Genetic, Unshared Environment, Genotype x Unshared Environment Interaction Effects to Twin/Sib Resemblance If gene-(unshared) environment interaction is not explicitly modeled, it will be subsumed into the E term in the classic twin model.

  12. Testing for GxE and GxC • Plot absolute within MZ pair differences against pair means (CARE!!) • Plot absolute within DZ pair differences against shared measured environment

  13. Basic Model (1960’s) Yi |E = gi + biE + di Yi |E = phenotype of ith genotype in environment E gi = main effect (“intercept”) of ith genotype bi = slope (“sensitivity”) of ith genotype in response to environment (gi , bi) ~ N[m,G]

  14. GxE: A biometrical genetic model A2 M A1 g2 g1 b a b=m + g1A1 + g2A2 P E e

  15. ith phenotype in kth level of measured environment • Pi|Mk= aA1i + (m + g1A1i + g2A2i)Mk+ eEik • aA1i + (m + g1A1i + g2A2i)Mk+ eEik • = ck+ (a+ g1Mk)A1i + g2MkA2i+ eEik

  16. Expected twin covariance conditional on environments of first and second twins Cov(Pi1|Mk ,Pi2|Ml ) = [a2 + ag1(Mk+Ml)+(g12+g22)MkMl]r + Cov(Ei1k,Ei2l) r= genetic correlation (1 in MZs)

  17. No GxE: Genetic covariances and correlations

  18. Scalar GxE: Genetic covariances and correlations

  19. Non-Scalar GxE: Genetic covariances and correlations

  20. Mixed GxE: Genetic covariances and correlations

  21. Note: Can’t separate components of “mixed” GxE unless you have same or related genotypes (MZ and/or DZ pairs) in concordant and discordant environments. [c.f. Analysis of sex limited gene effects].

  22. Modulation of gene expression by measured environment [and environmental modulation of non-genetic paths]

  23. Ways to Model Gene-Environment Interaction in Twin Data • Multiple Group Models • (parallel to testing for sex effects using multiple groups)

  24. Sex Effects Females Males

  25. Sex Effects Females Males aF = aM ? cF = cM ? eF = eM ?

  26. GxE Effects Urban Rural aU = aR ? cU = cR ? eU = eR ?

  27. Problem: • Many environments of interest do not fall into groups • Regional alcohol sales • Parental warmth • Parental monitoring • Socioeconomic status • Grouping these variables into high/low categories loses a lot of information

  28. Standard model • Means vector • Covariance matrix

  29. Model-fitting approach to GxE A C E A C E c a e a c e m m Twin 1 Twin 2 M M

  30. Model-fitting approach to GxE A C E A C E c a+XM e a+XM c e m m Twin 1 Twin 1 Twin 2 Twin 2 M M

  31. Individual specific moderators A C E A C E c a+XM1 e a+XM2 c e m m Twin 1 Twin 1 Twin 2 Twin 2 M M

  32. E x E interactions A C E A C E c+YM1 c+YM2 a+XM1 a+XM2 e+ZM1 e+ZM2 m m Twin 1 Twin 1 Twin 2 Twin 2 M M

  33. ‘Definition variables’ in Mx • General definition: Definition variables are variables that may vary per subject and that are not dependent variables • In Mx:The specific value of the def var for a specific individual is read into a matrix in Mx when analyzing the data of that particular individual

  34. ‘Definition variables’ in Mx create dynamic var/cov structure • Common uses: • To model changes in variance components as function of some variable (e.g., age, SES, etc) • As covariates/effects on the means (e.g. age and sex)

  35. Classic Twin Model: Var (T) = a2 + c2 + e2 • Moderation Model: Var (T) = (a + βXM)2 + (c + βYM)2 + (e + βZM)2 Purcell 2002, Twin Research

  36. Var (T) = (a + βXM)2 + (c + βYM)2 (e + βZM)2 Where M is the value of the moderator and Significance of βX indicates genetic moderation Significance of βY indicates common environmental moderation Significance of βZ indicates unique environmental moderation BM indicates a main effect of the moderator on the mean

  37. Additional Things to Consider • Unstandardized versus standardized effects

  38. Additional Things to Consider Unstandardized versus standardized effects

  39. Environment may not modulate all the genes C.f. Biometrical genetic model – Different genes may control main effect and sensitivity/slope

  40. AS AU aM aS + βXSM aU + βXUM βXS indicates moderation of shared genetic effects BXU indicates moderation of unique genetic effects on trait of interest M T

  41. Genotype-Environment Covariance/Correlation (rGE)see e.g. RB Cattell (1965)

  42. Gene-environment Interaction • Genetic control of sensitivity to the environment • Environmental control of gene expression Gene-environment Correlation • Genetic control of exposure to the environment • Different genotypes select or create different environments • Different genotypes are exposed to correlated environments (e.g. sibling effects, maternal effects) • Environments select on basis of genotype (Stratification, Mate choice)

  43. This complicates interpretation of GxE effects • If there is a correlation between the moderator (environment) of interest and the outcome, and you find a GxE effect, it’s not clear if: • The environment is moderating the effects of genes or • Trait-influencing genes are simply more likely to be present in that environment

  44. Ways to deal with rGE • Limit study to moderators that aren’t correlated with outcome • Pro: easy • Con: not very satisfying • Moderator in means model will remove from the covariance genetic effects shared by trait and moderator • Pro: Any interaction detected will be moderation of the trait specific genetic effects • Con: Will fail to detect GxE interaction if the moderated genetic component is shared by the outcome and moderator • Explicitly model rGE using a bivariate framework • Pro: explicitly models rGE • Con: Power to detect BXU decreases with increasing rGE; difficulty converging

  45. Getting it to workSARAH!!!!

  46. Practical (1): Using Multiple Group Models to test for GxE

  47. Adding Covariates to Means Model A C E A C E c a e a c e m+MM1 m+MM2 Twin 1 Twin 2 M M

  48. Matrix Letters as Specified in Mx Script A C E A C E c+YM1 c+YM2 a+XM1 a+XM2 c+cM*D1 c+cM*D2 e+ZM1 e+ZM2 a +aM*D1 a+aM*D2 e+eM*D2 e+eM*D1 Twin 1 Twin 2 M M m+MM2 m+MM1 mu+b*D2 mu+b*D1 Main effects and moderating effects

  49. Practical (2): Using Definition Variables to test for GxE

  50. Matrix Letters as Specified in Mx Script A C E A C E c+YM1 c+YM2 a+XM1 a+XM2 c+cM*D1 c+cM*D2 e+ZM1 e+ZM2 a +aM*D1 a+aM*D2 e+eM*D2 e+eM*D1 Twin 1 Twin 2 M M m m mu mu

More Related