1 / 37

The World Bank

The World Bank. Tajikistan: A Mechanism for Delivering Aid to the Poorest Households. Subjects of the presentation Issue: there is no effective way to distribute aid to the poorest households. Background: the national economy, poverty, malnutrition, and migration.

kaden-lara
Télécharger la présentation

The World Bank

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The World Bank Tajikistan: A Mechanism for Delivering Aid to the Poorest Households

  2. Subjects of the presentation • Issue: there is no effective way to distribute aid to the poorest households. • Background: the national economy, poverty, malnutrition, and migration. • Evaluation of the present social protection system. • Design of the reform. • Piloting the reform. • Evaluation of the pilot. • Next steps.

  3. I. There is no effective way to distribute aid to the poorest householdsMotivation: experience during the 2008 food crisis • Over the spring and summer of 2008, food commodity prices and especially wheat prices rose sharply. • This lowered real purchasing power, public welfare, and put child nutrition at risk in Tajikistan –especially since bread is the staple food . • The World Bank and other donors, such as the World Food Program, received funds for use in offsetting the impact of the food price increase on the poorest households. • Neither the Government nor donors had any mechanism for identifying the poorest households. • There were no lists (no registry) and this blocked donor aid.

  4. This led to a request for assistance • In 2009, the Government of Tajikistan asked the World Bank for help in building a poverty-targeted social protection system. • In response, the World Bank: • Prepared an evaluation of the current system of social assistance. • Prepared a methodology for targeting social assistance • Helped the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection to pilot the methodology in two districts. • Evaluated the pilot. • And is funding construction of a National Registry of Social Protection to manage applications, computation of eligibility, and payments.

  5. II. Country Background:Geography and its consequences for food security & AID. • Tajikistan is a largely mountainous country and only 3 percent of its territory can be cultivated. • Tajikistan experiences earthquakes, landslides (especially when the spring melts snow), flooding, and drought –which all harm food security.   • Tajikistan has a rugged border with Afghanistan, which favors heroin trafficking from Afghanistan through to Russia and beyond. • The country could become a target for the Taliban once the US withdraws from Afghanistan. • These are the sources of emergencies that harm food security and motivate donors to aid poor households.

  6. Position of Tajikistan in Central Asia

  7. Economic background: A civil war in the mid-1990s disrupted agriculture and trade and drove down GDP, which has recovered since about 2000.

  8. Main industries and sources of poverty • COTTON: This was grown in large plantations, which paid low wages to laborers and by small farmers forced to grow cotton. Production is now falling as foreign lenders withdraw financing and because the Government now allows small farmers to decide what crop to grow. Rents accrue to elites. • ALUMINUM: Produced a large Soviet-era, electricity-intensive, and government run plant. Rents accrue to elites. • HYDRO-ELECTRIC POWER: This is limited by physical capacity. Rents accrue to elites. • HEROIN SMUGGLING: Little is known. Rents accrue to elites. • SUBSISTENCE AGRICULTURE: Home gardening and herding of sheep and other livestock . Productivity is low. Benefits accrue to the population. • CONCLUSION: Large majority of the population derives little income from domestic economic activity.

  9. The national poverty rate was 47 percent in 2009 and poverty was concentrated in rural areas and among families with several children Poverty rates in 2009

  10. Tajikistan: nutrition situation • Underweight (low weight/age) in children aged 0 to 59 months was 12.5% in July 2011 (WFP). • Wasting (low weight/height) is a problem particularly for children less than 24 months of age (WFP). • Stunting (low height/age) was 29 percent among children aged 6 to 59 months (UNICEF and the Ministry of Health, 2009). Note: The high stunting rate means that infants and young children suffer from chronic under-nutrition, which severely and often irreversibly affects not only the physical but also cognitive development of children. Stunting in the first two years of life is especially damaging as it increases children’s vulnerability to disease and early death. If the children survive, they face poor physical health throughout their lives and limited capacity to learn and earn an income.

  11. Main survival strategy: migration • Poverty and malnutrition spurred a mass migration of men to Russia. A large fraction of the population are, in effect, economic refugees who have left Tajikistan to earn a living for themselves and their families. • The exact volume of migration is not known, but the World Bank Office in Tajikistan estimates that about 1.5 million people, mostly men, out of a total population of 6.8 million people have migrated to Russia to work. • Migrants sent home about USD 2.3 billion in 2010, which contributed greatly to the survival of the population.

  12. III. Evaluation of Tajikistan’s Social Protection System: Tajikistan spends less on social assistance, as a percentage of GDP, than any other country in the region. Share of social assistance spending in GDP in ECA Countries (in percentage points)

  13. The main social assistance program compensates households for increases in electricity and natural gas prices.

  14. Social assistance benefits are a tiny proportion of the income of the poorest quintile of households Generosity - Social assistance as a share of the income of the poorest quintile in ECA counties (Percentage point shares)

  15. Coverage rate: Social assistance benefits reached only about 20 percent the poorest quintile (20 percent) of households. The rest leaked to higher better off groups. Coverage of the poorest quintile of households.

  16. The case for reform is overwhelming. • The consolidated budget shows that social assistance is relatively small. • Furthermore, analysis of the 2009 data shows that the current social assistance programs are relatively ineffective in reaching the poor and in reducing poverty. • And finally, the review of implementation of the programs identified slips in budgeting, targeting, and accountability.

  17. IV. Design of the reformOverview of the reform The Government decided to pursue the following strategy: • Consolidate the present programs into a single social assistance program. • Adopt a system of targeting of social assistance. • Manage applications, decisions on eligibility, and payments through an National Electronic Registry.

  18. Proxy-means test for targeting. • Benefits could be targeted by region, by using and income test, a proxy-means test, or mixed-tests. The Government rejected geographic targeting of the poorest districts on the grounds that this was inequitable. In any case, no poverty data are available at the district level. • Income tests are not practical because households will not report receipt of remittances from abroad and it’s difficult to estimate household income from subsistence agriculture. • So the Government agreed to apply a proxy-means test (PMT). • The World Bank team estimated the test from household budget expenditure and asset data.

  19. Variables used in the best performing models

  20. Variables and Weights for the proxY-means tests

  21. Performance of the proxy-means test model in simulation

  22. V. Pilot of the reformProxy means-test for targeting. • The Government launched a pilot program of consolidated and poverty-targeted social assistance in Yevon and Istaravshan districts in 2011. • It targeted the nationally poorest 20 percent of households using the proxy-means test (above). • Between January 2011 and January 2012, 18,299 applicant households applied for the pilot social assistance benefit in the two districts, representing approximately 116,000 household members. • The Government paid social assistance benefits to the households that the proxy-means test identified as poor.

  23. VI. Evaluation of the Pilot:The evaluation draws on two large surveys • In the two pilot districts, enumerators interviewed 2,000 applicant households and 500 non-applicant households. • In a national survey, enumerators interviewed 2,000 households. • Interviews obtained detailed information on consumption spending, assets (including livestock), housing characteristics, education, and health.

  24. Estimated results of the pilot

  25. Coverage of the poorest quintile is low because too few of them applied • 30 percent of the poorest quintile applied. • Only 54 percent of the poorest quintile knew about the pilot program. • Nevertheless, the coverage rate for the target group (the nationally poorest 20%) was still higher than in the existing programs.

  26. Less than 30% of applicants in lowest quintile (the poorest); more than 40% applied in the highest quintile

  27. Proxy-Means Test performed relatively well The PMT formula performed well in identifying 48% of the nationally poorest 20% in the pilot districts. Most of the inclusion errors are in the second quintile. The PMT performance was particularly high when considering those who were among the poorest 40% nationally: 48% of the poorest applicants enrolled (23% in current programs).

  28. Proxy-means test: Who was selected? The percentage of accepted applications is highest at the lowest quintile, and lowest for the highest quintile

  29. Main conclusions from the evaluation. • The proxy-means test formula performed better in identifying the eligible beneficiaries than the current programs on conditional cash transfers, electricity and gas compensation. • Coverage of the poor is unacceptably low. Ways to improve targeting of social assistance • Improve the proxy-means test through re-estimation from 2012 data. • Mobilize and train local officials and community leaders to disseminate information and collect applications.

  30. New Proxy-means test • 2012 National Survey could lead to a more accurate test because it includes new variables • Housing construction and components. • Plumbing and water supply. • More detail on farm animals. • Cows, bulls, male goats, female goats, donkeys, rabbit, beehives, poultry, fish for aquaculture, sheep, pigs.

  31. Variables most correlated with consumption Both Urban and Rural • Landline phone • Generator • Electric radiator • Fridge • Washing machine • Electric heater • Microwave • Electric sewing • Computer • Satellite dish • Car or truck • Chimney • Number of people in HH • Living density Urban Only • Electric oven • Electric stove • Metal bars window • HHH education • Labor force status • Children under 11 years • Housing Floor • Marital Status Rural Only • Gas cylinders • Gas oven • Broshooka • Electric Fan • Housing Foundation • HHH age • Children under 14

  32. Performance of 2009 vs 2012

  33. Community outreach to increase the number of applications from poor households The information campaign should target the poor community through training of local civil servants and leaders, rather than target the broad public through TV, radio, and newspaper ads. Mobilize traditional community leaders (mahalya rais), women’s committees, and other community leaders to: Disseminate information on the pilot. Gather applications. Check the accuracy of information (to avoid rejection of applications at the district level).

  34. Measuring impact of social assistance reform in Tajikistan using regression discontinuity • 18,298 applicants, representing 115,891 people, had applied in the pilot districts by March 2012 • This is 29% of the population of the pilot districts • Transfer is 100 Somoni Per Quarter (21 USD) • 7 USD per month per household • Represents 2.4 % of average household consumption in the pilot districts

  35. Evaluation Methodology: Regression Discontinuity • Compare the outcomes (e.g. food consumption) of eligible and non-eligible applicants…. around the 180 threshold PMT score • Two detailed surveys in 2012: • Pilot district survey: interviewed 2000 applicant households and 500 randomly selected non-applicant households • National survey: interviewed 2000 randomly selected households

  36. Preliminary results from regression discontinuity tests Strong results • Food consumptions increased. • No significant impact on employment, or education and health expenditures Weak • Child labor decreased in female-headed households. • School absenteeism decreased in female-headed households. These results would be surprising, if confirmed, considering the small size of the social assistance benefits.

  37. VII. Next Steps • The Government plans to expand the piloting to 8 additional districts. • The expanded pilot will apply the proxy-means test estimated from 2012 data, and adjustment to include more elderly households. • There will be an outreach program through training of civil servants and use of community leaders to spread information and gather applications. • Construction of an IT system for management of applications, eligibility decisions, and for financial controls on payments

More Related