1 / 18

Historical Thinking, Primary Sources, and Rigor in History Education

Historical Thinking, Primary Sources, and Rigor in History Education. Mills Kelly George Mason University tkelly7@gmu.edu. What Are We Going to Do Today?. Think about thinking like a historian Watch some people think like a historian

kaden
Télécharger la présentation

Historical Thinking, Primary Sources, and Rigor in History Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Historical Thinking, Primary Sources, and Rigor in History Education Mills KellyGeorge Mason University tkelly7@gmu.edu

  2. What Are We Going to Do Today? • Think about thinking like a historian • Watch some people think like a historian • Try to arrive at some partial agreement about what we think historical thinking is and how we can recognize it when we see it • Consider various primary sources and how students might work with them • Talk about rigor in history education

  3. Historical Thinking Make a list for me of as many characteristics of historical thinking as you can think of in the next five minutes or so.

  4. Historical Thinking Turn to the person sitting next to you and share your list.

  5. Historical Thinking Share one item on your list with me.

  6. Historical Thinking I need a volunteer from the audience.

  7. Historical Thinking The Little Big Horn Massacre July 6, 1876 LATEST ACCOUNTS OF THE CHARGE. FORCE OF FOUR THOUSAND INDIANS IN POSITION ATTACKED BY LESS THAN FOUR HUNDRED TROOPS - OPINIONS OF LEADING ARMY OFFICERS OF THE DEED AND ITS CONSEQUENCES - FEELING IN THE COMMUNITY OVER THE DISASTER. The dispatches giving an account of the slaughter of Gen. Custer's command, published in THE TIMES of yesterday, are confirmed and supplemented by official reports from Gen. A. H. Terry, commanding the expedition. On June 25 Gen. Custer's command came upon the main camp of Sitting Bull, and at once attacked it, charging the thickest part of it with five companies, Major Reno, with seven companies attacking on the other side. the soldiers were repulsed and a wholesale slaughter ensued. Gen. Custer, his brother, his nephew, and his brother-in-law were killed, and not one of his detachment escaped. The Indians surrounded Major Reno's command and held them in the hills during a whole day, but Gibbon's command came up and the Indians left. The number of killed is stated at 300 and the wounded at 31. Two hundred and seven men are said to have been buried in one place. The list of killed includes seventeen commissioned officers. It is the opinion of Army officers in Chicago, Washington, and Philadelphia, including Gens. Sherman and Sheridan, that Gen. Custer was rashly imprudent to attack such a large number of Indians, Sitting Bull's force being 4,000 strong. Gen. Sherman thinks that the accounts of the disaster are exaggerated. The wounded soldiers are being conveyed to Fort Lincoln. Additional details are anxiously awaited throughout the country. New York Times

  8. Historical Thinking

  9. Historical Thinking

  10. Historical Thinking

  11. Primary Sources: Images

  12. Primary Sources: Images

  13. Primary Sources: Images

  14. Primary Sources: Objects

  15. Rigor in the Digital World

  16. Rigor in the Digital World

  17. Rigor in the Digital World

  18. Rigor in the Digital World

More Related